<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Unofficial Next Comcast Speed Upgrade Rumor Topic Part II in Comcast HSI</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r17763250</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 08:18:11 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 08:18:11 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Unofficial Next Comcast Speed Upgrade Rumor Topic Part II</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18040060</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Last Result:<br>Download Speed: 14003 kbps (1750.4 KB/sec transfer rate)<br>Upload Speed: 1939 kbps (242.4 KB/sec transfer rate)<br><br>my line has been down for 2 days now im lighting Fast!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18040060</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 15:26:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Unofficial Next Comcast Speed Upgrade Rumor Topic Part II</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18001823</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/628135"><b>bgoodbody</b></A> : I was told by a local tech that the big reason for a firmware upgrate to Arris to 5.05 was to improve diagnostics.<br><SMALL>--<br>- Bill</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18001823</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 18:30:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Unofficial Next Comcast Speed Upgrade Rumor Topic Part II</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17978965</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/720248"><b>Johkal</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  impulse101 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1435081"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br><div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Johkal <A HREF="/useremail/u/720248"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</SMALL><br><br><div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by EagleFlyt :</SMALL><br><br>Just spoke to an inside guy yesterday at comcast in Independence Mo. and yes docsis 3.0 is being integrated and they are working out a few minor bugs right now. he said it should all be up and running as of this summer.<br> </DIV>All well and good, but without DOCSIS 3.0 capable modems, a 3.0 network is useless. I've only seen one 3.0 modem which has not been certified yet.<br> </DIV>If comcast rolls out 3.0 you can bet that you will see capable modems start poping up like crazy.<br> </DIV>I can tell you that when modems get certified, normally you won't see that model for 2 to 3 years offered by an ISP for lease or by retailers for purchase. Given the rumour that Comcast will roll-out DOCSIS 3.0 at the end of summer 07, it is unrealistic given that no 3.0 modems have been certified as of 3/10/07.<br><SMALL>--<br>Write me up a 125.......I Can't Drive 55   &raquo;<A HREF="http://redrocker.com/" >redrocker.com/</A>  &raquo;<A HREF="http://cabowabo.com/" >cabowabo.com/</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17978965</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 16:39:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Unofficial Next Comcast Speed Upgrade Rumor Topic Part II</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17978577</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/799879"><b>Loose Wire</b></A> : My HSI and DV both went down last night, twice, an hour apart, for about 20 minutes at a time.  Checked the modem configuration screen and Comcast had pushed new firmware to the modem.  Arris TM402P modem, had firmware from June, 2006 when I had DV installed, new firmware is dated Nov 16, 2006.<br><br>Hopefully they are getting ready for speed change (?).]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17978577</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 15:18:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Unofficial Next Comcast Speed Upgrade Rumor Topic Part II</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17978439</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1432955"><b>Cabal</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  impulse101 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1435081"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br><div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Johkal <A HREF="/useremail/u/720248"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</SMALL><br><br>All well and good, but without DOCSIS 3.0 capable modems, a 3.0 network is useless. I've only seen one 3.0 modem which has not been certified yet.<br> </DIV>If comcast rolls out 3.0 you can bet that you will see capable modems start poping up like crazy.<br> </DIV>I think you're overestimating the time it takes to design, certify, and bring to market a DOCSIS product. With a planned nationwide roll-out of upload PowerBoost in the May+ timeframe, I think talking now about DOCSIS 3.0 is a bit optimistic.<br><SMALL>--<br>Interested in <A HREF="http://www.enginuity.org/">open source engine management</A> for your Subaru?</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17978439</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 14:55:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Unofficial Next Comcast Speed Upgrade Rumor Topic Part II</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17976743</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1435081"><b>impulse101</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Johkal <A HREF="/useremail/u/720248"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR><div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by EagleFlyt :</SMALL><br><br>Just spoke to an inside guy yesterday at comcast in Independence Mo. and yes docsis 3.0 is being integrated and they are working out a few minor bugs right now. he said it should all be up and running as of this summer.<br> </DIV>All well and good, but without DOCSIS 3.0 capable modems, a 3.0 network is useless. I've only seen one 3.0 modem which has not been certified yet.<br> </DIV>If comcast rolls out 3.0 you can bet that you will see capable modems start poping up like crazy.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17976743</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 07:00:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Unofficial Next Comcast Speed Upgrade Rumor Topic Part II</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17974253</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/720248"><b>Johkal</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by EagleFlyt :</SMALL><br><br>Just spoke to an inside guy yesterday at comcast in Independence Mo. and yes docsis 3.0 is being integrated and they are working out a few minor bugs right now. he said it should all be up and running as of this summer.<br> </DIV>All well and good, but without DOCSIS 3.0 capable modems, a 3.0 network is useless. I've only seen one 3.0 modem which has not been certified yet.<br><SMALL>--<br>Write me up a 125.......I Can't Drive 55   &raquo;<A HREF="http://redrocker.com/" >redrocker.com/</A>  &raquo;<A HREF="http://cabowabo.com/" >cabowabo.com/</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17974253</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 17:59:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Unofficial Next Comcast Speed Upgrade Rumor Topic Part II</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17969845</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Just spoke to an inside guy yesterday at comcast in Independence Mo. and yes docsis 3.0 is being integrated and they are working out a few minor bugs right now. he said it should all be up and running as of this summer.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17969845</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:53:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Unofficial Next Comcast Speed Upgrade Rumor Topic Part II</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17943936</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1436934"><b>klinjaa</b></A> : So I questioned the tech manager & the lead tech that has been coming out to try and "troubleshoot" their peering issue at my house.  Neither has any knowledge of Comcast upgrading to Docsis 3.0 and claim to have not heard any rumors either.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17943936</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 20:52:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Most reliable recent rumor is: &#x22;Comcastic 50 Mbps!&#x22;</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17934811</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1435081"><b>impulse101</b></A> : I also get my full 8Mbps constantly. Plus 30Mbps on powerboost. I believe if they offer 50Mbps that I will get that.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17934811</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 06:43:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Unofficial Next Comcast Speed Upgrade Rumor Topic Part II</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17870967</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/442639"><b>ztmike</b></A> : I know it's powerboost...but thats pretty good of a boost for being on the 6meg plan..and for being during peak hours.<br><br>I guess im just happy with Comcast as to when i use to have them at my moms in a town over..]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17870967</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 22:21:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Unofficial Next Comcast Speed Upgrade Rumor Topic Part II</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17870301</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1245628"><b>fonzbear2000</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  ztmike <A HREF="/useremail/u/442639"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>But i am seeing some nice d/l speeds on my 6meg line<br><br>Download Speed: 20153 kbps (2519.1 KB/sec transfer rate)<br></DIV>that's powerboost<br><SMALL>--<br>NEVER pay full price: &raquo;<A HREF="http://home.comcast.net/~fonzbear2000/fonzbear2000.html" >home.comcast.net/~fonzbear2000/f&middot;&middot;&middot;000.html</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17870301</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 20:43:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Unofficial Next Comcast Speed Upgrade Rumor Topic Part II</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17868968</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/442639"><b>ztmike</b></A> : I don't know if this means anything but when i ordered the Comcast triple play the guy on the phone said that comcast will upgrade the 6/384 upload to 1meg ..said sometime at the end of this month (Feb) ...<br><br>But i am seeing some nice d/l speeds on my 6meg line<br><br>Download Speed: 20153 kbps (2519.1 KB/sec transfer rate)<br><br>which is pretty good for being at 4pm]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17868968</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 17:03:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Unofficial Next Comcast Speed Upgrade Rumor Topic Part II</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17864787</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1043110"><b>Chris 313</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  fonzbear2000 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1245628"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>any word or rumors on if/when we're supposed to get powerboost for upload? it sure would be nice especially if it turns into permaboost!<br> </DIV>It was said in the announcement on here a while back that they were starting this month. Just imagine upload Permaboost. A full 2-3 megs for an entire upload.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17864787</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 23:23:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Unofficial Next Comcast Speed Upgrade Rumor Topic Part II</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17864217</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1245628"><b>fonzbear2000</b></A> : any word or rumors on if/when we're supposed to get powerboost for upload? it sure would be nice especially if it turns into permaboost!<br><SMALL>--<br>NEVER pay full price: &raquo;<A HREF="http://home.comcast.net/~fonzbear2000/fonzbear2000.html" >home.comcast.net/~fonzbear2000/f&middot;&middot;&middot;000.html</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17864217</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 21:54:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Unofficial Next Comcast Speed Upgrade Rumor Topic Part II</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17863534</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/879997"><b>dadkins</b></A> : Looks ok from here to your HE...<br><br><div class="code"><PRE><span class="codetext">Tracing route to 73.127.76.1 over a maximum of 30 hops<br> <br>  1     1 ms     1 ms     1 ms  192.168.0.1<br>  2     *        *        *     Request timed out.<br>  3     9 ms     9 ms     *     GE-2-22-ur02.pinole.ca.sfba.comcast.net &#91;68.87.1<br>96.233&#93;<br>  4     7 ms     9 ms     *     GE-1-5-ur03.pinole.ca.sfba.comcast.net &#91;68.87.19<br>9.106&#93;<br>  5     7 ms     *        8 ms  68.87.192.97<br>  6     9 ms     9 ms     *     68.87.192.93<br>  7    10 ms     9 ms     9 ms  68.87.226.130<br>  8    11 ms     9 ms    35 ms  12.116.90.17<br>  9    58 ms    57 ms    58 ms  12.122.114.70<br> 10    64 ms    63 ms    63 ms  tbr1-cl2.sl9mo.ip.att.net &#91;12.122.10.41&#93;<br> 11    59 ms    59 ms    60 ms  12.123.24.201<br> 12     *       71 ms    71 ms  12.118.20.10<br> 13    77 ms    76 ms    78 ms  te-8-3-ar01.roseville.mn.minn.comcast.net &#91;68.87<br>.174.5&#93;<br> 14    80 ms    76 ms    76 ms  te-8-1-ur01.fridley.mn.minn.comcast.net &#91;68.86.2<br>32.61&#93;<br> 15    74 ms    74 ms    75 ms  te-8-1-ur01.nempls.mn.minn.comcast.net &#91;68.86.23<br>2.53&#93;<br> 16    76 ms    79 ms    78 ms  te-8-1-ur01.nmpls.mn.minn.comcast.net &#91;68.86.232<br>.49&#93;<br> 17    73 ms    74 ms    74 ms  te-8-1-ur01.stlouispark.mn.minn.comcast.net &#91;68.<br>86.232.45&#93;<br> 18    78 ms    76 ms    76 ms  73.127.76.1<br> <br>Trace complete.</SPAN></PRE></DIV><br><SMALL>--<br>Think outside the Fox... <A HREF="http://www.opera.com/">Opera</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17863534</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 20:06:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Unofficial Next Comcast Speed Upgrade Rumor Topic Part II</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17862296</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1436934"><b>klinjaa</b></A> : The peering issue is only part of it.  They are having difficulties on the inside of their own network.  When they come out with their little testing device (wish I had a name for it) it only tests out to the local node.  The first point of contact from the cable modem.  Their problems are happening throughout the former Time Warner lines on the Comcast network.  Here is an example of what I've been tracking for the last 3.5 months.  This is just the last 24 hours.  This is absolutely boggling the techs & the area service manager (who I just got off the phone with).  I appologize ahead of time for the mess that WinMTR makes.<br><br>1535 - 1845<br><br>|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------     --------|<br>|                                      WinMTR statistics                                   |<br>|                       Host              -   %  | Sent | Recv | Best | Avrg | Wrst | Last |<br>|------------------------------------------------|------|------|------|------|------|------|<br>|       customer-MZT-75-68.megared.net.mx -    0 | 9725 | 9725 |    0 |    0 |   94 |    0 |<br>|                             73.127.76.1 -    1 | 9725 | 9722 |    0 |    6 |  469 |    0 |<br>|ge-1-37-ur01.stlouispark.mn.minn.comcast.net -1 | 9725 | 9654 |    0 |    5 |  375 |   15 |<br>|   te-2-1-ur01.nmpls.mn.minn.comcast.net -    1 | 9725 | 9661 |    0 |    5 |  484 |   31 |<br>|  te-2-1-ur01.nempls.mn.minn.comcast.net -    2 | 9725 | 9623 |    0 |    5 |  437 |   16 |<br>| te-2-1-ur01.fridley.mn.minn.comcast.net -    2 | 9725 | 9584 |    0 |    5 |  328 |   15 |<br>|te-9-1-ar01.roseville.mn.minn.comcast.net -   7 | 9725 | 9116 |    0 |    7 |  453 |   16 |<br>|                          12.116.107.197 -    1 | 9725 | 9697 |   15 |   23 |  375 |   15 |<br>|             tbr2032101.sl9mo.ip.att.net -    1 | 9725 | 9673 |   15 |   25 |  516 |   31 |<br>|               tbr2-cl7.cgcil.ip.att.net -    1 | 9725 | 9681 |   15 |   24 |  437 |   32 |<br>|             ggr3-ge110.cgcil.ip.att.net -    4 | 9725 | 9425 |   15 |   27 |  468 |   31 |<br>|                    att-gw.chi.qwest.net -    2 | 9725 | 9561 |   15 |   24 |  562 |   31 |<br>|              cer-core-02.inet.qwest.net -    1 | 9725 | 9631 |   15 |   25 |  500 |   31 |<br>|              chx-edge-01.inet.qwest.net -    2 | 9725 | 9571 |   15 |   25 |  453 |   32 |<br>|                            63.150.27.98 -    2 | 9725 | 9621 |   15 |   27 |  515 |   31 |<br>|                  dns.chi1.speakeasy.net -    1 | 9725 | 9723 |   15 |   24 |  453 |   31 |<br>|________________________________________________|______|______|______|______|______|______|<br>   WinMTR - 0.8. Copyleft @2000-2002 Vasile Laurentiu Stanimir  ( stanimir@cr.nivis.com )<br><br>1845 - 2140<br><br>|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------     --------|<br>|                                      WinMTR statistics                                   |<br>|                       Host              -   %  | Sent | Recv | Best | Avrg | Wrst | Last |<br>|------------------------------------------------|------|------|------|------|------|------|<br>|       customer-MZT-75-68.megared.net.mx -    1 | 8196 | 8195 |    0 |    1 |  187 |    0 |<br>|                             73.127.76.1 -    1 | 8195 | 8190 |    0 |   10 |  438 |    0 |<br>|ge-1-37-ur01.stlouispark.mn.minn.comcast.net -2 | 8195 | 8097 |    0 |    9 |  422 |    0 |<br>|   te-2-1-ur01.nmpls.mn.minn.comcast.net -    1 | 8195 | 8144 |    0 |    9 |  453 |   16 |<br>|  te-2-1-ur01.nempls.mn.minn.comcast.net -    2 | 8195 | 8108 |    0 |   10 |  484 |   16 |<br>| te-2-1-ur01.fridley.mn.minn.comcast.net -    2 | 8195 | 8044 |    0 |   10 |  516 |   15 |<br>|te-9-1-ar01.roseville.mn.minn.comcast.net -   7 | 8195 | 7625 |    0 |   11 |  843 |   15 |<br>|                          12.116.107.197 -    1 | 8195 | 8147 |   15 |   28 |  562 |   15 |<br>|             tbr2032101.sl9mo.ip.att.net -    1 | 8195 | 8131 |   15 |   29 |  516 |   31 |<br>|               tbr2-cl7.cgcil.ip.att.net -    1 | 8195 | 8148 |   15 |   28 |  484 |   31 |<br>|             ggr3-ge110.cgcil.ip.att.net -    4 | 8195 | 7933 |   15 |   32 |  641 |   31 |<br>|                    att-gw.chi.qwest.net -    2 | 8195 | 8066 |   15 |   27 |  531 |   15 |<br>|              cer-core-02.inet.qwest.net -    2 | 8195 | 8070 |   15 |   28 |  500 |   15 |<br>|              chx-edge-01.inet.qwest.net -    2 | 8195 | 8077 |   15 |   29 |  469 |   16 |<br>|                            63.150.27.98 -    2 | 8195 | 8089 |   15 |   30 |  516 |  109 |<br>|                  dns.chi1.speakeasy.net -    1 | 8195 | 8193 |   15 |   28 |  469 |   16 |<br>|________________________________________________|______|______|______|______|______|______|<br>   WinMTR - 0.8. Copyleft @2000-2002 Vasile Laurentiu Stanimir  ( stanimir@cr.nivis.com )<br><br>2327 - 2/19/07 @ 0315<br><br>|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------     --------|<br>|                                      WinMTR statistics                                   |<br>|                       Host              -   %  | Sent | Recv | Best | Avrg | Wrst | Last |<br>|------------------------------------------------|------|------|------|------|------|------|<br>|       customer-MZT-75-68.megared.net.mx -    0 | 10902 | 10902 |    0 |    0 |  235 |    0 |<br>|                             73.127.76.1 -    1 | 10902 | 10899 |    0 |    8 |  579 |   16 |<br>|ge-1-37-ur01.stlouispark.mn.minn.comcast.net -1 | 10902 | 10859 |    0 |    9 | 1218 |   15 |<br>|   te-2-1-ur01.nmpls.mn.minn.comcast.net -    1 | 10902 | 10873 |    0 |    9 |  516 |   16 |<br>|  te-2-1-ur01.nempls.mn.minn.comcast.net -    1 | 10901 | 10818 |    0 |    9 |  843 |   16 |<br>| te-2-1-ur01.fridley.mn.minn.comcast.net -    2 | 10901 | 10751 |    0 |   10 |  438 |    0 |<br>|te-9-1-ar01.roseville.mn.minn.comcast.net -   7 | 10901 | 10191 |    0 |   11 |  750 |    0 |<br>|                          12.116.107.197 -    1 | 10901 | 10860 |   15 |   27 |  594 |   32 |<br>|             tbr2032101.sl9mo.ip.att.net -    1 | 10901 | 10854 |   15 |   28 |  453 |   32 |<br>|               tbr2-cl7.cgcil.ip.att.net -    1 | 10901 | 10859 |   15 |   27 |  500 |   31 |<br>|             ggr3-ge110.cgcil.ip.att.net -    3 | 10901 | 10584 |   15 |   31 |  593 |   31 |<br>|                    att-gw.chi.qwest.net -    2 | 10901 | 10741 |   15 |   27 |  953 |   16 |<br>|              cer-core-02.inet.qwest.net -    1 | 10901 | 10793 |   15 |   28 |  469 |   31 |<br>|              chx-edge-01.inet.qwest.net -    2 | 10901 | 10753 |   15 |   29 |  485 |   31 |<br>|                            63.150.27.98 -    2 | 10901 | 10782 |   15 |   29 |  516 |   31 |<br>|                  dns.chi1.speakeasy.net -    0 | 10901 | 10901 |   15 |   27 | 1062 |   16 |<br>|________________________________________________|______|______|______|______|______|______|<br>   WinMTR - 0.8. Copyleft @2000-2002 Vasile Laurentiu Stanimir  ( stanimir@cr.nivis.com )<br><br>0315 - 0613<br><br>|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------     --------|<br>|                                      WinMTR statistics                                   |<br>|                       Host              -   %  | Sent | Recv | Best | Avrg | Wrst | Last |<br>|------------------------------------------------|------|------|------|------|------|------|<br>|       customer-MZT-75-68.megared.net.mx -    0 | 7950 | 7950 |    0 |    1 |  140 |    0 |<br>|                             73.127.76.1 -    1 | 7950 | 7948 |    0 |    8 |  141 |   15 |<br>|ge-1-37-ur01.stlouispark.mn.minn.comcast.net -1 | 7950 | 7886 |    0 |    9 |   78 |   16 |<br>|   te-2-1-ur01.nmpls.mn.minn.comcast.net -    1 | 7950 | 7936 |    0 |    9 |   94 |   15 |<br>|  te-2-1-ur01.nempls.mn.minn.comcast.net -    1 | 7950 | 7918 |    0 |    9 |   94 |   16 |<br>| te-2-1-ur01.fridley.mn.minn.comcast.net -    1 | 7950 | 7873 |    0 |    9 |  282 |    0 |<br>|te-9-1-ar01.roseville.mn.minn.comcast.net -   6 | 7950 | 7518 |    0 |   10 |  235 |   15 |<br>|                          12.116.107.197 -    1 | 7950 | 7935 |   15 |   26 |  250 |   31 |<br>|             tbr2032101.sl9mo.ip.att.net -    1 | 7950 | 7924 |   15 |   28 |  235 |   31 |<br>|               tbr2-cl7.cgcil.ip.att.net -    1 | 7950 | 7926 |   15 |   27 |  265 |   16 |<br>|             ggr3-ge110.cgcil.ip.att.net -    3 | 7950 | 7730 |   15 |   30 |  234 |   16 |<br>|                    att-gw.chi.qwest.net -    2 | 7950 | 7853 |   15 |   26 |  125 |   16 |<br>|              cer-core-02.inet.qwest.net -    1 | 7950 | 7899 |   15 |   27 |  156 |   16 |<br>|              chx-edge-01.inet.qwest.net -    1 | 7950 | 7884 |   15 |   28 |  250 |   31 |<br>|                            63.150.27.98 -    1 | 7950 | 7881 |   15 |   29 |  187 |   31 |<br>|                  dns.chi1.speakeasy.net -    1 | 7950 | 7949 |   15 |   26 |  141 |   31 |<br>|________________________________________________|______|______|______|______|______|______|<br>   WinMTR - 0.8. Copyleft @2000-2002 Vasile Laurentiu Stanimir  ( stanimir@cr.nivis.com )<br><br>0613 - 1544<br>|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------     --------|<br>|                                      WinMTR statistics                                   |<br>|                       Host              -   %  | Sent | Recv | Best | Avrg | Wrst | Last |<br>|------------------------------------------------|------|------|------|------|------|------|<br>|       customer-MZT-75-68.megared.net.mx -    0 | 26560 | 26560 |    0 |    0 |  328 |    0 |<br>|                             73.127.76.1 -    1 | 26560 | 26557 |    0 |    6 | 1109 |    0 |<br>|ge-1-37-ur01.stlouispark.mn.minn.comcast.net -1 | 26560 | 26407 |    0 |    5 |  656 |   15 |<br>|   te-2-1-ur01.nmpls.mn.minn.comcast.net -    1 | 26560 | 26459 |    0 |    6 |  578 |    0 |<br>|  te-2-1-ur01.nempls.mn.minn.comcast.net -    1 | 26560 | 26425 |    0 |    6 |  437 |    0 |<br>| te-2-1-ur01.fridley.mn.minn.comcast.net -    2 | 26560 | 26206 |    0 |    6 |  719 |   16 |<br>|te-9-1-ar01.roseville.mn.minn.comcast.net -   6 | 26560 | 24981 |    0 |    7 | 1593 |    0 |<br>|                          12.116.107.197 -    1 | 26560 | 26488 |   15 |   24 |  609 |   16 |<br>|             tbr2032101.sl9mo.ip.att.net -    1 | 26560 | 26467 |   15 |   26 | 1703 |   16 |<br>|               tbr2-cl7.cgcil.ip.att.net -    1 | 26560 | 26470 |   15 |   25 | 1859 |   31 |<br>|             ggr3-ge110.cgcil.ip.att.net -    3 | 26560 | 25793 |   15 |   28 | 2375 |   31 |<br>|                    att-gw.chi.qwest.net -    2 | 26560 | 26184 |   15 |   24 | 2703 |   31 |<br>|              cer-core-02.inet.qwest.net -    1 | 26560 | 26329 |   15 |   26 |  766 |   31 |<br>|              chx-edge-01.inet.qwest.net -    2 | 26560 | 26157 |   15 |   26 | 1406 |   63 |<br>|                            63.150.27.98 -    2 | 26560 | 26248 |   15 |   28 | 3047 |   31 |<br>|                  dns.chi1.speakeasy.net -    1 | 26560 | 26559 |   15 |   24 |  672 |   16 |<br>|________________________________________________|______|______|______|______|______|______|<br>   WinMTR - 0.8. Copyleft @2000-2002 Vasile Laurentiu Stanimir  ( stanimir@cr.nivis.com )]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17862296</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 17:02:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Most reliable recent rumor is: &#x22;Comcastic 50 Mbps!&#x22;</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17860235</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/879997"><b>dadkins</b></A> : From what I inderstand(I could be wrong), the AT&T routers at the peering points are - not Comcast. They belong to AT&T and AT&T needs to un-bork them.<br><br>We here in Cali know all too well about AT&T peering. <br>Comcast will likely be replacing equipment in your area as well(search for CRAN). <br><br>This will not happen overnight. It does take time to get things sorted out and equipment replaced.<br><br>They replaced EVERYTHING here in my market(formerly AT&T). Took 'em about a year. Kicks ass now though! ;)<br><SMALL>--<br>Think outside the Fox... <A HREF="http://www.opera.com/">Opera</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17860235</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 11:12:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Most reliable recent rumor is: &#x22;Comcastic 50 Mbps!&#x22;</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17858849</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1436934"><b>klinjaa</b></A> : I personally have been very unhappy since I got switched over to Comcast from Timewarner.  They supposedly are using the same hardware & lines that Timewarner was using in the area and just simply changed the IP's.  Either way the route is now through ATT which has had notorious peering problems for my company and our Global Crossing line.  I have been tracking anywhere from 6%-18% packet loss since getting switched.  Primarily in our city (inner suburb of Minneapolis/St Paul), and again at the peering address between Comcast & ATT.  2 techs have admitted to me now that they are seeing this across the entire metro area on new installs to the former Time Warner area.  I've also tracked this information from 3 other suburbs affected by the switchover.<br><br>If Comcast is seriously thinking about upgrading the service they need to throw down some serious $$$ to get their infrastructure in place.  Aside from that they need to work on their peering issues with ATT.  I have documented this loss since 10/25/06 and have complained about the service repeatedly during this time.  In January I was actually told by Comcast they will not resolve the line and to cancel my service.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17858849</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:57:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Unofficial Next Comcast Speed Upgrade Rumor Topic Part II</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17849315</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : i sure hope those denver rumors are true... I will be falling all over myself with those speeds....]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17849315</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 05:10:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Unofficial Next Comcast Speed Upgrade Rumor Topic Part II</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17818064</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1043110"><b>Chris 313</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  fonzbear2000 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1245628"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>i am thinking and hoping(the key word being hoping lol) that some time after the up and coming upload powerboost, we will get final upgrades this year and they will be the same as powerboost: 6/384 upgraded to 12/1 and 8/768 upgraded to 16/2-that would be TOO sweet!<br> </DIV>Check out 16/2 with powerboost!  :D]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17818064</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 12:20:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Unofficial Next Comcast Speed Upgrade Rumor Topic Part II</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17815669</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1245628"><b>fonzbear2000</b></A> : i am thinking and hoping(the key word being hoping lol) that some time after the up and coming upload powerboost, we will get final upgrades this year and they will be the same as powerboost: 6/384 upgraded to 12/1 and 8/768 upgraded to 16/2-that would be TOO sweet!<br><SMALL>--<br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/remark,16585229">never pay full price for high speed again!!!</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17815669</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 23:21:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Unofficial Next Comcast Speed Upgrade Rumor Topic Part II</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17800400</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/799879"><b>Loose Wire</b></A> : For what it's worth, bumped into a Comcast tech near my place yesterday.  Asked him when we are getting the upgrade.  He thought it was scheduled for June, at 16/2. (Denver)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17800400</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 07:26:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Unofficial Next Comcast Speed Upgrade Rumor Topic Part II</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17791650</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  tshirt <A HREF="/useremail/u/1039313"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A><br><br>  <br>The other side of major providers ALL heading towards higher speeds will be  a shortage of backbone,switch capacity, and server bandwidth at the content end.<br> [/BQUOTE :</SMALL><BR><BR>Good point !]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17791650</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 20:26:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Unofficial Next Comcast Speed Upgrade Rumor Topic Part II</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17787850</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1397140"><b>TD Nickell</b></A> : Good information  tshirt <A HREF="/useremail/u/1039313"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>,thanks! :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17787850</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 10:28:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Unofficial Next Comcast Speed Upgrade Rumor Topic Part II</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17786907</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1039313"><b>tshirt</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  fonzbear2000 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1245628"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>what are the MAX speeds that the current doscis comcast is using can achieve? until 3.0 does become a reality, why not just give us those max speeds?<br> </DIV> I think that's what the 16/1 (2) represents, maybe 1/2 the theoretical limits of 1.1, but as high as is practical to upgrade the plant to before going to DOCSIS 3.<br> Why expend time and money splitting nodes and adding channels for a temporary fix, when you could work towards  a long term solution? In fact filling all the channels now could cause problems when they switch as 3 uses differently allocated (wider) channels.<br> the DOCSIS 3 workgroup(wisely) decided to avoid an interim 2.0+/2.0B half assed fix, now it is time for the ISP part of the group to push ahead and use the standard they agreed to.<br>The other side of major providers ALL heading towards higher speeds will be  a shortage of backbone,switch capacity, and server bandwidth at the content end.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17786907</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 04:27:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Unofficial Next Comcast Speed Upgrade Rumor Topic Part II</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17786881</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1039313"><b>tshirt</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by paco  :</SMALL><BR><BR><div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  tshirt <A HREF="/useremail/u/1039313"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>   :</SMALL><BR><BR><div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  sortofageek <A HREF="/useremail/u/455626"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>    :</SMALL><BR><BR> <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>quote:</SMALL><HR> ...that the whole network is being upgraded right now to work with the Docsis 3.0. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br> </SMALL></SMALL><br> </DIV> I can believe they are <B>starting</B> to upgrade towards full DOCSIS 3.0 compliance..........but that process could take years (and billion$ ) before 3.0 is system wide.<br> Because DOCSIS 3.0 is (should be) backward compatible, not all equipment MUST be replaced at once, and new modem deployment would be the last step.<br> </DIV>Why would that be the last step ?? Why would 3.0 even be implimented if no one were able to take advantage of it ??<br>That's not logical to me......<br> </DIV>First step (for each deployment area) would be to plan and engineer any nessesary line extensions or improvements. then schedule and complete those, adding a DOCSIS 3 CMTS as it is completed. At the same time or before they must shift the DHCP and DNS to be fully IPv6 compliant (required by DOCSIS3)and change channel allocations splitting or combining nodes, etc Up until this is done CC only needs a few thousand modems for QC testing and tech training.<br> Once customer deployment begins they may require several million modems within a couple  years time (not everyone will feel the need to jump to a higher (and probably more expensive) tier at once. older 1.1 & 2.0 modem will continue to work at the lower speeds.<br><br> One major public relations problem will be the timing.<br> Obviously, they either have to delay switchover until the vast majority of areas are ready (expensive and slow) or do it region by region, and withstand the screaming from un-upgraded areas  ("I pay the same as Region X users but can't get the speeds they get............" think of the current " they got upgraded first"  whining seen here everyday, times 10)<br>  once CC give the word to one or more vendors that they need  a million modem by (insert date) how long do you think would it take to ramp up the factories in china,etc,. to pump them out?<br><br> The longer it takes to get to that point the more compiant designs will be available, important for CC cost control.<br> And all through this they must continue to maintain the current system without major interruption.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17786881</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 04:03:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Unofficial Next Comcast Speed Upgrade Rumor Topic Part II</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17786807</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1245628"><b>fonzbear2000</b></A> : what are the MAX speeds that the current doscis comcast is using can achieve? until 3.0 does become a reality, why not just give us those max speeds?<br><SMALL>--<br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/remark,16585229">never pay full price for high speed again!!!</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17786807</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 03:18:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Unofficial Next Comcast Speed Upgrade Rumor Topic Part II</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17786056</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  tshirt <A HREF="/useremail/u/1039313"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR><div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  sortofageek <A HREF="/useremail/u/455626"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</SMALL><BR><BR> <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>quote:</SMALL><HR> ...that the whole network is being upgraded right now to work with the Docsis 3.0. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br> </SMALL></SMALL><br> </DIV> I can believe they are <B>starting</B> to upgrade towards full DOCSIS 3.0 compliance..........but that process could take years (and billion$ ) before 3.0 is system wide.<br> Because DOCSIS 3.0 is (should be) backward compatible, not all equipment MUST be replaced at once, and new modem deployment would be the last step.<br> </DIV>Why would that be the last step ?? Why would 3.0 even be implimented if no one were able to take advantage of it ??<br>That's not logical to me......]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17786056</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 23:33:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Most reliable recent rumor is: &#x22;Comcastic 50 Mbps!&#x22;</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17785974</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1433431"><b>cracker 52</b></A> : Well, I'm another lucky guy who's getting his full speeds at Comcast, and I'm looking forward to the rollout of DOCSIS 3.0, however long it takes. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17785974</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 23:22:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Most reliable recent rumor is: &#x22;Comcastic 50 Mbps!&#x22;</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17785774</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1423681"><b>powerNglory</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  bgetchel <A HREF="/useremail/u/169827"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR><div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  ihateskapunk <A HREF="/useremail/u/1254547"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>i get my full 8.8 Mbps...<br> </DIV>Count yourself lucky.<br> </DIV>I think the majority of people do get their speeds. People who are having issues like yourself tend to be more outspoken than people who are not having any problems.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17785774</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 22:56:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Unofficial Next Comcast Speed Upgrade Rumor Topic Part II</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17785525</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/887660"><b>hottboiinnc</b></A> : The same way they do now. They buy them cheap and from many companies or the one that will give them the cheapest deal.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17785525</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 22:17:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Most reliable recent rumor is: &#x22;Comcastic 50 Mbps!&#x22;</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17785468</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/169827"><b>bgetchel</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  ihateskapunk <A HREF="/useremail/u/1254547"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>i get my full 8.8 Mbps...<br> </DIV>Count yourself lucky.<br><SMALL>--<br>Brendan Getchel</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17785468</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 22:09:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Most reliable recent rumor is: &#x22;Comcastic 50 Mbps!&#x22;</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17785218</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/879997"><b>dadkins</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  ihateskapunk <A HREF="/useremail/u/1254547"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>i get my full 8.8 Mbps...<br> </DIV>Same!<br>Sometimes same x3... depends on source. <br><SMALL>--<br>Think outside the Fox... <A HREF="http://www.opera.com/">Opera</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17785218</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 21:31:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Most reliable recent rumor is: &#x22;Comcastic 50 Mbps!&#x22;</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17784780</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1254547"><b>ihateskapunk</b></A> : i get my full 8.8 Mbps...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17784780</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 20:23:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Most reliable recent rumor is: &#x22;Comcastic 50 Mbps!&#x22;</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17784502</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/169827"><b>bgetchel</b></A> :  Yup, that's right. Comcast is scheduled to announce their new, earth-shattering 50 Mbps "Combastic" Service.<br><br>Of course, they're really just calling it that. Just like they have their "8.8 Mbps" service that is really a 512Kbps service. They just change the name, let the marketing department spin it, and out plops the same old fecal material from the posterior orifice.<br><br>Comcast is a cruel joke. I think I'll start a 100 Mbps dial-up service.<br><SMALL>--<br>Brendan Getchel</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17784502</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 19:39:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Unofficial Next Comcast Speed Upgrade Rumor Topic Part II</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17782534</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1397140"><b>TD Nickell</b></A> : Looks like a good replacement for my SB5100.<br>Good find  tshirt <A HREF="/useremail/u/1039313"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>! :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17782534</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 14:47:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Unofficial Next Comcast Speed Upgrade Rumor Topic Part II</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17782457</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1039313"><b>tshirt</b></A> :  Here's is the modem that is probably closest to DOCSIS 3.0 certification. <br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://broadband.motorola.com/catalog/productdetail.asp?ProductID=486" >broadband.motorola.com/catalog/p&middot;&middot;&middot;ctID=486</A><br> It has been used by CableLabs in several tests/demonstrations of DOCSIS 3 technologies and currently deployed by StarHub of Singapore for their pre DOCSIS 3 <I> MaxOnline Ultimate plan</I> (100/2).]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17782457</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 14:36:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Unofficial Next Comcast Speed Upgrade Rumor Topic Part II</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17781780</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1131062"><b>Wayne99021</b></A> : Some Comcast people were working on a node in my area and I stopped to talk to them. One of them was a field engineer.<br>He said he has heard DOCSIS 3.0 being mentioned but didn't know the whole story.<br>He did say that as of 2009 that all channels have to be digital and theoretically they could give 100mg down and 10 up.<br>When I asked him if that could happen where I live he said it all depends on the competition.<br>Where I live we still get the occasional moose walking down the road and no competition in sight so guess I will just have to be happy that I don't have to use dial up.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17781780</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 12:46:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Unofficial Next Comcast Speed Upgrade Rumor Topic Part II</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17780049</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1039313"><b>tshirt</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  sortofageek <A HREF="/useremail/u/455626"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR> <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>quote:</SMALL><HR> ...that the whole network is being upgraded right now to work with the Docsis 3.0. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br> </SMALL></SMALL><br> </DIV> I can believe they are <B>starting</B> to upgrade towards full DOCSIS 3.0 compliance..........but that process could take years (and billion$ ) before 3.0 is system wide.<br> Because DOCSIS 3.0 is (should be) backward compatible, not all equipment MUST be replaced at once, and new modem deployment would be the last step.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17780049</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 04:02:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Unofficial Next Comcast Speed Upgrade Rumor Topic Part II</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17779244</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1397140"><b>TD Nickell</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  frroo <A HREF="/useremail/u/938599"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>Just think about all the new modems that will have to be purchased / rented.  I don't believe there are any DOCSIS 3.0 compliant modems currently out on the market.<br><br>When I bought a new modem a couple of years ago I made sure I had a DOCSIS 2.0 compliant modem (Linksys).  If I have to buy a new modem, so be it.  It's a small price to pay for more speed!<br><br>Fran<br> </DIV>Yes....I would like to know how they can get millions of modems in inventory to even start.The way it looks to me it will be years down the road.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17779244</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 22:57:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Unofficial Next Comcast Speed Upgrade Rumor Topic Part II</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17770068</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/938599"><b>frroo</b></A> : Just think about all the new modems that will have to be purchased / rented.  I don't believe there are any DOCSIS 3.0 compliant modems currently out on the market.<br><br>When I bought a new modem a couple of years ago I made sure I had a DOCSIS 2.0 compliant modem (Linksys).  If I have to buy a new modem, so be it.  It's a small price to pay for more speed!<br><br>Fran]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17770068</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 15:11:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Unofficial Next Comcast Speed Upgrade Rumor Topic Part II</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17769363</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/455626"><b>sortofageek</b></A> : Other whisper is that it is a thought for a new business class.<br><br>It's ok not to believe, Hob.  I'm just repeating whispers.  I don't have my heart wrapped around any of this.   ;)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17769363</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 13:09:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Unofficial Next Comcast Speed Upgrade Rumor Topic Part II</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17768330</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1397140"><b>TD Nickell</b></A> : Everything i have read on Docsis 3.0,makes me believe we won't see any rollout in 2007.<br>Maybe 2008 if were lucky. :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17768330</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 09:09:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Unofficial Next Comcast Speed Upgrade Rumor Topic Part II</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17766138</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/522329"><b>hobgoblin</b></A> : I can't believe this Sorto sorry....Its no where near being rolled out across the Network.<br><br>Testing maybe...Roll Out..no way.<br><br>Hob<br><SMALL>--<br>"A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds." <br>- Ralph Waldo Emerson <br></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17766138</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 20:57:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Unofficial Next Comcast Speed Upgrade Rumor Topic Part II</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17764149</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/720248"><b>Johkal</b></A> : Any present DOCSIS 2.0 capable modem will not be upgradable to DOCSIS 3.0.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17764149</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 14:58:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Unofficial Next Comcast Speed Upgrade Rumor Topic Part II</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17764099</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1423681"><b>powerNglory</b></A> : Testing is one thing, but how long it will take to implement is another.<br><br>Also does that mean I would have to get a new modem or would my current Surfboard 5120 be upgradable to 3.0?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17764099</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 14:47:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Unofficial Next Comcast Speed Upgrade Rumor Topic Part II</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17763664</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/455626"><b>sortofageek</b></A> : OK, birdy whispered rumors this morning.  ;)<br><br>Birdy said there is a buzz among some of the techs:<br><br> <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>quote:</SMALL><HR> ...that the whole network is being upgraded right now to work with the Docsis 3.0. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br>Hmmmmmmm ... if this has any truth in it, could this be why some have seen the high speed testing?  :D<br><br><SMALL><SMALL>Remember this is a rumor thread.  Please don't shoot the messenger! </SMALL></SMALL><br><SMALL>--<br><A HREF="http://www.dslreports.com/metashare/4c7b76">My Folding@Home Farm</A> * <A HREF="http://www.dslreports.com/faq/2913">Join Team Helix?</A> * <A HREF="http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16110364">I am praying for Rebekah</A>.</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17763664</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 13:12:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Unofficial Next Comcast Speed Upgrade Rumor Topic Part II</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17763250</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/455626"><b>sortofageek</b></A> : Continuing from ----> <br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/remark,15731996">Unofficial Next Comcast Speed Upgrade Rumor Topic</A><br>Let's keep the rumors flowing in this topic only, folks.  :)<br><br>If we mods receive whispers, we'll edit this post to let you know.  Nothing like a whispered rumor, eh?  ;)<br><br><SMALL> See also:<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/remark,17499731">Merry Christmas from Verizon FIOS</A><br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/remark,17038441">[Speed] Over 1mbps upload normal?</A><br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/remark,16602468">its july and going into august wheres the new speed upgrades</A><br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/remark,16458345">[Split] Another Speed Upgrade Rumor Topic</A><br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/remark,16413227">Any word on upload increasing ever?</A><br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/remark,15782897">[Speed] BIG Speed increase coming ?!</A><br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/remark,15741490">[Speed] Comcast Speed Upgrades in Washington State!</A><br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/remark,15736239">[Speed] Is 16/1 avail. in Denver</A><br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/remark,15695077">Rollout Schedule???</A><br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/remark,15730789">Comcast upload speed boosts in Maryland?</A><br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/remark,15725386">[Speed] West Michigan Speedup?</A><br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/remark,15725377">Speed Increase Methuen MA</A><br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/remark,15703926">Anyone have a speed increase in the Philly area</A><br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/remark,15715899">[Speed] 16/1 in Sarasota</A><br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/remark,15616152">16/1 speeds comcast</A><br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/remark,15677354">/forum/remark,15677354</A><br><br></SMALL><br><SMALL>--<br><A HREF="http://www.dslreports.com/metashare/4c7b76">My Folding@Home Farm</A> * <A HREF="http://www.dslreports.com/faq/2913">Join Team Helix?</A> * <A HREF="http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16110364">I am praying for Rebekah</A>.</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17763250</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 11:43:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
