how-to block ads
|
|
Share Topic
 |
 |
|
|
 birdfeedrPremium,MVM
join:2001-08-11
Warwick, RI
kudos:5 | reply to Jason Levine
Re: Tough choice said by Jason Levine:Let's see... I have $20. Oh, and is anyone else having problems browsing » mediadownloads.walmart.com/ with FireFox? It looks fine in IE, but FireFox renders the page as an unstyled mess. Not sure about the $20. I did not RTFA, it's pointless. The DSLR abstract does say $20, but when I go to the Walmart site, it looks like the highest price is $14.88, with some cheaper.
DSLR abstract also says "it will only work on XP & Vista with IE." If that's the case, the scrambled styling for non-IE browsers is a pre-screening for compatibility.  Ya think?
If you can't see it, how can you order it? It will help cut down on returns "because it doesn't work on my computer".  | |
| said by birdfeedr:Not sure about the $20. I did not RTFA, it's pointless. The DSLR abstract does say $20, but when I go to the Walmart site, it looks like the highest price is $14.88, with some cheaper. Actually, the article says that new movies will cost up to $19.88 but that older films will cost up to $9.88.
said by birdfeedr:DSLR abstract also says "it will only work on XP & Vista with IE." If that's the case, the scrambled styling for non-IE browsers is a pre-screening for compatibility. Ya think? I somehow missed that line in the abstract (and it wasn't in the article). I guess, as a web developer, I just assume that it's standard practice to make your website viewable in most browsers (or provide a page explaining why it isn't). Silly me.
said by birdfeedr:If you can't see it, how can you order it? It will help cut down on returns "because it doesn't work on my computer". How would you return a digital download? (Not that a "no returns" policy wouldn't stop some people from trying.) | |
|
