<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Maybe he should court EMI first in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r17784446</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:50:25 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:50:25 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Maybe he should court EMI first</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17784446</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/303002"><b>amdace</b></A> : I wonder if we might not see the Beatles (DRM Free) on iTunes soon, considering this recent settlement:<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/6332319.stm" >news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainmen&middot;&middot;&middot;2319.stm</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17784446</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 19:32:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Maybe he should court EMI first</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17783721</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/197199"><b>Doctor Four</b></A> : Not only does EMI hold the rights to a lot of artists <br>not on iTunes (I think the Beatles are one), but it is<br>the only one of the Big Four that have even considered<br>abandoning DRM, whether on digital downloads or CDs.<br><SMALL>--<br>"The trouble with computers, of course, is that they are very sophisticated idiots." - Doctor Who (from Robot)</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17783721</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 17:45:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
