Lame in http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r17785152 en Wed, 02 Dec 2009 07:07:32 EDT Wed, 02 Dec 2009 07:07:32 EDT Re: Lame http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17789050 MysticGogeta : Yeah what a fail :D]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17789050 Wed, 07 Feb 2007 13:47:45 EDT Re: Lame http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17785554 Nerdtalker :
said by Anonymous See Profile :

That was a joke.
I know ;) I just wanted to comment. ;)]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17785554 Tue, 06 Feb 2007 22:21:49 EDT Re: Lame http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17785543 Anonymous : That was a joke.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17785543 Tue, 06 Feb 2007 22:20:39 EDT Re: Lame http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17785520 Nerdtalker :
said by Anonymous See Profile :

3 out of 13?

I hope they do better next time.
Rather, I hope there isn't a next time.

Thank God for resolution caches, otherwise this could be pretty interesting. Nice to see some resiliency in the system for once, since normal usage wasn't disrupted at all by this. This is clearly a "show-off" type attack, since it didn't practically accomplish anything.
--
"Some people never see the light till it shines thru bullet holes." -Bruce Cockburn

I'm testing Gmail's spam filters: Broadbandreports1@gmail.com
Spam: 12900+ messages currently using 406 MB.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17785520 Tue, 06 Feb 2007 22:16:45 EDT Lame http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17785152 Anonymous : 3 out of 13?

I hope they do better next time.

:D]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17785152 Tue, 06 Feb 2007 21:21:12 EDT