<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Cellular/wireless broadband is where broadband is going ....&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Cellularwireless-broadband-is-where-broadband-is-going-17787818</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:04:59 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:04:59 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Cellular/wireless broadband is where broadband is going ....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Cellularwireless-broadband-is-where-broadband-is-going-17789745</link>
<description><![CDATA[nixen posted : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by <a href="/profile/594412" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=594412');">ThrowDemsOut</a>:</SMALL><br><br>... for the future and to NOT count it is ludicrous. Everyone, including BBR says wireless broadband is the future. So, why shouldn't the FCC count it as broadband growth? <br> </DIV>Fixed wireless? Sure, that's valid. Mobile wireless? Uh, no particularly given the draconian limitations that pretty much go hand-in-hand with mobile wireless.<br><br>-tom<br><SMALL>--<br>"Experience should teach us to be most on our guard to protect liberty when the government's purposes are beneficial. The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well meaning but without understanding." -Louis D Brandeis</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Cellularwireless-broadband-is-where-broadband-is-going-17789745</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 15:36:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Cellular/wireless broadband is where broadband is going ....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Cellularwireless-broadband-is-where-broadband-is-going-17787923</link>
<description><![CDATA[Stumbles posted : Yep with the main point IMO being the FCC <B>CANNOT</B> even follow their own guidelines. If that don't smack of incompetence I don't know what does. The FCC is nothing but a laughing stock of a government organization.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Cellularwireless-broadband-is-where-broadband-is-going-17787923</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 10:41:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Cellular/wireless broadband is where broadband is going ....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Cellularwireless-broadband-is-where-broadband-is-going-17787907</link>
<description><![CDATA[CMoore2004 posted : Perhaps Sprint's should. A 5GB limit with Verizon can really be considered a broadband connection? 200kbps allows for over 60GB/month.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Cellularwireless-broadband-is-where-broadband-is-going-17787907</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 10:38:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Cellular/wireless broadband is where broadband is going ....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Cellularwireless-broadband-is-where-broadband-is-going-17787845</link>
<description><![CDATA[Rob posted : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by <a href="/profile/594412" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=594412');">ThrowDemsOut</a>:</SMALL><br><br>... for the future and to NOT count it is ludicrous. Everyone, including BBR says wireless broadband is the future. So, why shouldn't the FCC count it as broadband growth? <br> </DIV>" Isenberg argues it's not fair to include these capped, pricey and restrictive connections because the[y] violate the FCC's own free-access guidelines, and without them the U.S. broadband growth rate is only actually 27% -- which would mean it has the 26th fastest growing number of broadband Internet access lines. "<br><br>Pretty much sums it up. <br><SMALL>--<br><A HREF="http://www.yourip.us"> YourIP.US </A> - It's Your IP .. and <I>more</I>!<br><A HREF="http://www.rr.cx"> rr.cx </A> - Personal Site.. coming soon.</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Cellularwireless-broadband-is-where-broadband-is-going-17787845</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 10:27:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Cellular/wireless broadband is where broadband is going ....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Cellularwireless-broadband-is-where-broadband-is-going-17787818</link>
<description><![CDATA[ThrowDemsOut posted : ... for the future and to NOT count it is ludicrous. Everyone, including BBR says wireless broadband is the future. So, why shouldn't the FCC count it as broadband growth? <br><SMALL>--<br>--<BR><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/bqv2h">My BLOG</A><BR><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/yz8xto">My Web Page</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Cellularwireless-broadband-is-where-broadband-is-going-17787818</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 10:21:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

