republican-creole
Search:  

 
theme to white backgroundlet page decide theme
HomeFind ServiceReviewsISP NewsFAQsForumsToolsDatabaseAbout 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Warrant Issued For Verizon's Arrest » That'd be a sight....
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
I went through the same thing in 2001 »
« How do you arrest a company?  

phattieg

join:2001-04-29
Winter Park, FL
·Verizon Wireless B..
·Sprint Mobile Broa..

Re: That'd be a sight....

said by pb5k See Profile :

said by phattieg See Profile :

said by donjuan2002 See Profile :

Well that will be the Owner of the company in this case the CEO that is in charge, somebody is getting is going to lose his/her job.
Umm, who would they take. Certainly not the CEO. The whole purpose of getting a corporate license is so no one is personally held responsible for damages/lawsuits.
I think you're confusing stockholder liability with that of management liability. While it is true that shareholders can not be held responsible for a corporation's actions, its ethically challenged employees most definitely can be.
Please read the post. I already said what you said, only I chose different wording which may have confused my point. The whole reply says the CEO won't go to jail, but whoever managed his account will be the likely culprit. It's probably not well documented as to who exactly handled his issue, so there was no one to send to court.
--
SIPPhone/Gizmo # 17476200648 / PIMPNET Chatline / Ran by Asterisk & Slackware 10.1.
permalink · 2007-02-09 14:56:56 · Print · Reply to this

pb5k
more cowbell
Premium
join:2005-11-16
Glendale, AZ
·Cox HSI

Re: That'd be a sight....

Please learn to write a more cogent post before criticising another's reading abilities.

said by phattieg See Profile :

The whole purpose of getting a corporate license is so no one is personally held responsible for damages/lawsuits.
The wording in that post clearly implies that no one within a company may be held liable simply because of its corporate structure, which clearly isn't the case.

If you meant something else, it wasn't broadcast as clearly as you thought. My apologies.
--
"When they call the roll in the Senate, the Senators do not know whether to answer 'Present' or 'Not guilty.'" --
Theodore Roosevelt
permalink · 2007-02-09 16:30:34 · Print · Reply to this
Forums » Warrant Issued For Verizon's ArrestI went through the same thing in 2001 »
« How do you arrest a company?  

Sunday, 29-Nov 16:25:59 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [124] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [112] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [96] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [87] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [80] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [78] Verizon CEO: Hulu Will Be Dead Soon
· [77] Weekend Open Thread
· [69] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [63] Thanksgiving Open Thread
· [41] ICANN Slams DNS Redirection
Most people now reading
· Is Easynews down? [Filesharing Software]
· Are GPS's better today? [General Questions]
· Grey Cup on the Web? [Canadian Chat]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· XBox 360 "Local Host" Server [Comcast HSI]
· What is the spell hit cap for a lvl 80 full arcane spec mage [World of Warcraft]
· ToC 4th boss - Preliminary Strategy for Twin Valkyr [World of Warcraft]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· [Newsgroups] Newzleech down? [Filesharing Software]
· Surfers beware !!! [TekSavvy]