how-to block ads
|
Neo321
join:2007-02-12
| reply to DaMaGeINC
Re: Load Balancing/multihoming/bonding/3 Nics
To DaSneaky1D ::
I didnt got your point, please explain it???
To Leathal ::
I am developing all this as per my usage and needs, I understand that your point of online banking is gud one but its not a requirement for me.
So, I want the system and know all its limitations...
To cdru ::
I am sorry if my words sounded harsh to you.
Actually I wrote like that because it seems a bit impossible, but I have to implement it at any cost.
To DaMaGeINC ::
Dont worry about USB lan cards, they simply act as a normal lan card after putting up the driver.
Even Suse 10.2 also have inbuilt drivers for usb cards, so its not a problem.
I am just using usb lan cards instead of ordinary lan card coz of limitation of ports on computer.
So, USB lan card isnt an issue, dont care about it, just consider it as an normal lan card.
To All ::
You might think that a pc wont support coz of power failure and system resources, so let me tell you one thing that after implementing all this, I ll start my linux system in shell mode(without any graphics), and in shell mode, even a PIII can serve whole of my network without any problem.
I am already using my system as a server for my whole network, but this time I want to merge all my input lines.
So guys, there are no limitation for my target, just think abt it , and make it possible....
Thanks ...
Rohit | |
cdru
Go Colts
Premium,MVM
join:2003-05-14
Fort Wayne, IN
| said by Neo321  :To cdru :: I am sorry if my words sounded harsh to you. Actually I wrote like that because it seems a bit impossible, but I have to implement it at any cost. So you have to implement it at any cost, but you aren't allowed to buy hardware. Aren't those two mutually exclusive of each other?
To DaMaGeINC ::
Dont worry about USB lan cards, they simply act as a normal lan card after putting up the driver.
Even Suse 10.2 also have inbuilt drivers for usb cards, so its not a problem.
I am just using usb lan cards instead of ordinary lan card coz of limitation of ports on computer.
So, USB lan card isnt an issue, dont care about it, just consider it as an normal lan card. We know what USB LAN cards are and that they can work, you just won't ever find a competent network administrator that would even suggest using a USB network card for production equipment in a business setting, let alone actually use one. A $5 generic PCI NIC is so much better then even the best USB NIC.
To All ::
You might think that a pc wont support coz of power failure and system resources, so let me tell you one thing that after implementing all this, I ll start my linux system in shell mode(without any graphics), and in shell mode, even a PIII can serve whole of my network without any problem.
I am already using my system as a server for my whole network, but this time I want to merge all my input lines. We never doubted that a PC couldn't do the task. Many places do have a PC serving as a router. There just creates many more points of failures when you use a PC. It's even worse when you want to start using USB NICs. It also would be highly recommended NOT to use a production server also as your load balancer/router and firewall. Too many eggs in one basket.
So guys, there are no limitation for my target, just think abt it , and make it possible.... No, we can help you make it possible, but we won't make it possible for you. What specific question do you have?
--
Go Colts | |
DaSneaky1D
one wall to block them all
Premium,MVM
join:2001-03-29
The Lou
 ·Charter Pipeline
2 edits | reply to Neo321
said by Neo321 :To All :: You might think that a pc wont support coz of power failure and system resources, so let me tell you one thing that after implementing all this, I ll start my linux system in shell mode(without any graphics), and in shell mode, even a PIII can serve whole of my network without any problem. I am already using my system as a server for my whole network, but this time I want to merge all my input lines. So guys, there are no limitation for my target, just think abt it , and make it possible.... OK, it's still fairly early, so I may have taken the bolded text out of context, but you're reaaaally out of line. You don't come here and make demands. Period.
Second, members here are offering perfectly sound suggestions. It seems, though, that you haven't explained what you're trying to do in a clear manner.
Are you trying to use your server also as a firewall? If so, bad idea. Yeah, several Linux-based firewalls allow this, but a firewall is for network protection, not doing the dishes too. Let it serve it's dedicated purpose.
Are you trying have one server use multiple ISP's as fail over and load balancing all by itself?
I suggested PFsense because you can do load-balancing and failover with it. It will need to be used on a dedicated computer, but you can either add multiple NIC's to it to connect to different ISP's, or using a managed switch with VLAN capability, you can use 2 NICs, with one interface being the LAN and VLAN interfaces all facing the WAN.
With all the info give, now YOU can make it possible.
EDIT - I meant PFsense.
--
:: my trivial ramblings :: | |
Neo321
join:2007-02-12
| To cdru ::
Yes, I have to implement it at any cost... hardware isnt a solution as I have seen only quad-wan supporting router.
So a software based solution is the right choice, as it ll support any number of ISPs.
To DaSneaky1D ::
Maybe I havnt explained it properly, coz I am a bit confused with terms like bonding, multihoming, etc... and all.
basically, in one line what I want is,
A computer which can act as a multi-wan router
I have found some software for this like pfsense, and clarkconnect.
I ll also take a look at ipsense too.
Thanks... | |
|
