Re: ArcServe 11.1 - dslreports.com

Author	All Replies
SP_Writer Premium join:2002-03-19 Clifton Park, NY	reply to Kilroy Re: ArcServe 11.1 "My problem was that the directory no longer existed, so it wasn't showing up in the drill down. The ArcServe filter options left more than a little to be desired as you have to enter 8.3 file names." In this case you would have to go back into an earlier tape that you knew the data/directory was present and merge that tape. This of course means the user(s) who lost their info would have to know the date it was deleted (ha ha ha!). So, yes it could take a while of merging tapes to find the correct file/directory.
SP_Writer Premium join:2002-03-19 Clifton Park, NY	to forum · permalink · · 2007-02-20 08:34:28 ·
Kilroy Premium,MVM join:2002-11-21 Ann Arbor, MI ·WOW Internet and C..	said by SP_Writer : In this case you would have to go back into an earlier tape that you knew the data/directory was present and merge that tape. This of course means the user(s) who lost their info would have to know the date it was deleted (ha ha ha!). So, yes it could take a while of merging tapes to find the correct file/directory. I wiped the database, one suggestion provided by someone at work. And I did merge the tape, but it still wasn't available in the drill down. I'm just thankful that it is done and in the future won't be my issue. -- How hard does DRM have to bite before business abandon it?
	to forum · permalink · · 2007-02-21 17:09:58 ·


Tuesday, 01-Dec 23:47:48	Terms of Use \| Privacy Policy \| Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo \| feedback \| contact over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com. page compression OFF