 tiger72SexaT duorPPremium
join:2001-03-28
Saint Louis, MO
kudos:1
 ·T-Mobile US
| This is why DRM will never succeed. I'm willing to pay for a high quality, commercial free tv show. Unfortunately, no one offers such a thing.
--
|- The LP »www.lp.org/issues/issues.shtml -|
|- Cato @ Liberty »www.cato-at-liberty.org -| |
|
openbox9
join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
kudos:2 | This isn't really about the DRM, it's about the quality of the video. It is possible to have high-quality, HD content, while using DRM. Unfortunately, it seems that the online purveyors of content, don't want high quality HD content available on the Internet because it's a paradoxical change that their marketing/manufacturing machines aren't ready for. |
|
|
|
tiger72SexaT duorPPremium
join:2001-03-28
Saint Louis, MO
kudos:1 Reviews:
·T-Mobile US
| said by openbox9:This isn't really about the DRM, it's about the quality of the video. It is possible to have high-quality, HD content, while using DRM. Unfortunately, it seems that the online purveyors of content, don't want high quality HD content available on the Internet because it's a paradoxical change that their marketing/manufacturing machines aren't ready for. I think DRM and poor quality go hand in hand in most circumstances. It's obvious that the content producers and distributors don't value quality, as almost all DRM content sacrifices quality for no apparent reason. The only high quality DRM content (which people pay for!) is on porn sites. For everything else, DRM is analogous with poor quality crap.
--
|- The LP »www.lp.org/issues/issues.shtml -|
|- Cato @ Liberty »www.cato-at-liberty.org -| |
|
 MaxoYour tax dollars at work.Premium,VIP
join:2002-11-04
Tallahassee, FL | reply to openbox9
said by openbox9:This isn't really about the DRM, it's about the quality of the video. That's the first thing I thought. This has nothing to do with DRM. |
|
 brandonSome truth included in this post.Premium
join:2003-03-31
Hurley, MS
1 edit | reply to tiger72
said by tiger72:The only high quality DRM content (which people pay for!) is on porn sites.
Thanks for admitting that this has nothing to do with DRM. |
|
 mohitoPremium
join:2003-09-29
New York, NY | reply to tiger72
Well said.
Fact is people are getting wise.
This means that people don't want 500 channels of crap for some base price, they'd and I would rather pay a specific amount for channels that are chosen.
Get with it executive types.
Fact is, people will DL stuff to avoid commercials, it doesn't have to be the day of broadcast, that BS is done.
Oh gee, it's so Uuuuuurrrrrrgeeeent, watch now!
NO! |
|
openbox9
join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
kudos:2 | reply to tiger72
said by tiger72:I think DRM and poor quality go hand in hand in most circumstances. But there's no technical relationship between DRM and audio/video quality of the content.said by tiger72:The only high quality DRM content (which people pay for!) is on porn sites. And DVD, and HD-DVD, and Blue-Ray, and etc..... Once again, high quality and DRM are not dependent upon each other. Rather, I hypothesize that the lower quality digital content is an attempt for the content producers to squash the new distribution mechanism in favor of their traditional, tangible goods, model. |
|
tiger72SexaT duorPPremium
join:2001-03-28
Saint Louis, MO
kudos:1 Reviews:
·T-Mobile US
| said by openbox9:said by tiger72:I think DRM and poor quality go hand in hand in most circumstances. But there's no technical relationship between DRM and audio/video quality of the content. I never said it was a technical relationship. It's just a working relationship.
DRM (over the internet) -> shitty quality.
Of course, old, physical media with DRM is the preferred method of delivery by the antiquated movie and television industry. DVDs have DRM, as do all future media proposed and preferred by the studies. That doesn't change the fact that when it comes to the internet, DRM is pretty synonymous with crappy quality. I don't see the studios changing their mind on using DRM, just like I don't see them changing their mind on using 400x300 video (or whatever other low-res, low-bitrate video they choose to use).
--
|- The LP »www.lp.org/issues/issues.shtml -|
|- Cato @ Liberty »www.cato-at-liberty.org -| |
|
