this is sad and wasteful in http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r17885626 en Wed, 02 Dec 2009 15:29:27 EDT Wed, 02 Dec 2009 15:29:27 EDT Re: this is sad and wasteful http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17886888 Fluker : that's a nice positive spin on a bad situation. Though I'm sure residents might have been happy to see the money spent so they could have inexpensive,fast internet.

props to you finding that article. because something is bad, it's not all bad.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17886888 Fri, 23 Feb 2007 13:14:30 EDT Re: this is sad and wasteful http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17886551 wifi4milez :
said by TKJunkMail See Profile :

said by Fluker See Profile :

Honestly doesn't anybody else feel that the city is owed some money?
The lawsuit saved the city $6.9 million because the cost of equipment dropped that much during the time the project was delayed. Maybe the city owes those doing the suing a commission.
»www.theadvertiser.com/apps/pbcs.···311/1002
"If the Supreme Court rules in our favor, it won't be that it cost us $1.1 million in legal fees. It's that the lawsuit saved us $6.9 million because the cost of the technology and hardware dropped," he said.
Thats a good way of looking at it!
--
я люблю медведей!]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17886551 Fri, 23 Feb 2007 12:03:51 EDT Re: this is sad and wasteful http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17886004 SRFireside : Interesting slant on the whole issue. The article went on to say Cox customers in Lafayette also saved money due to the lack of rate hikes that other cities in the area were exposed to. Cox Communications must be having a tantrum over how they wasted their money on propaganda and in turn benefited the very project they wanted to squash. ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17886004 Fri, 23 Feb 2007 10:18:50 EDT Re: this is sad and wasteful http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17885768 TKJunkMail :
said by Fluker See Profile :

Honestly doesn't anybody else feel that the city is owed some money?
The lawsuit saved the city $6.9 million because the cost of equipment dropped that much during the time the project was delayed. Maybe the city owes those doing the suing a commission.
»www.theadvertiser.com/apps/pbcs.···311/1002
"If the Supreme Court rules in our favor, it won't be that it cost us $1.1 million in legal fees. It's that the lawsuit saved us $6.9 million because the cost of the technology and hardware dropped," he said.

--
--
My BLOG
My Web Page]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17885768 Fri, 23 Feb 2007 09:27:48 EDT this is sad and wasteful http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17885626 Fluker : Honestly doesn't anybody else feel that the city is owed some money? BellSouth has a pretty clear tactic of essentially harassing at every opportunity and they have caused quite a bit of damage to a legitimate program.

/my thoughts

sorry if my writing sucks, i need coffee]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17885626 Fri, 23 Feb 2007 09:00:03 EDT