 1 edit | Outdoor AC Surge Suppressor Hi folks,
I plan to put up a Celeron mini-itx MT box 85ft up. The unit is AC powered. It uses 12v dc-dc converter and I estimate it will consume about 60 watt of power, which is 5A of current draw. So POE is out of the questions.
Is there any outdoor AC surge suppressor available that will protect both the equipment side and the power-source side ? Iam more concerned with protecting the power-source side though because a surge on the AC line will likely destroy all the indoor equipment, not to mention my neightbor's Samsung 42in LCD TV.
If any of you nice folks out there that have any experience with a similar setup, will you kindly share it with me please?
Thank you, thank you. |
|
 lutfulPremium join:2005-06-16 Ottawa, ON Reviews:
·TekSavvy DSL
| I always recommend much lower power fanless VIA EDEN boards outdoors but many have used mini-ITX: »Outdoor Mini-ITX Boards
*** Even far away lightning will induce surge in the long AC cable, so you have to provide very robust protection at building entry end on all conductors of the cable ***
Citel makes outdoor AC surge protectors with gas discharge tubes (GDT) and sometimes additional MOV inside. Check this page first and show the NEMA models in the service entrance tab to an electrician. »www.citelprotection.com/citel/ac_surge.htm
You should provide separate surge protection at that end connected to tower grounding system but do not let your electrician "bond" the tower ground to your building ground. A long exposed bonding cable will provide an unprotected path for massive lightning surge current that will fry any protection device at your building entry in a few milliseconds.
A very safe method will be to use 24V/3A AC transformer connected to "code-compliant" outdoor AC outlet close to the building entry point. The 24V AC can be converted to 12V/5A at the mini-ITX. You will find UL/CSA approved 24V AC transformers and 24VAC/12VDC converters at alarm industry distributors. |
|
 | said by lutful:You should provide separate surge protection at that end connected to tower grounding system but do not let your electrician "bond" the tower ground to your building ground. A long exposed bonding cable will provide an unprotected path for massive lightning surge current that will fry any protection device at your building entry in a few milliseconds. Thanks for the advice.
But, shouldnt the tower ground and the building ground be bonded? I have both ground cables bonded where the cables enters the earth. I think Iam getting a cardiac arrest.
said by lutful:A very safe method will be to use 24V/3A AC transformer connected to "code-compliant" outdoor AC outlet close to the building entry point. The 24V AC can be converted to 12V/5A at the mini-ITX. You will find UL/CSA approved 24V AC transformers and 24VAC/12VDC converters at alarm industry distributors. I have thought of this method before. But using transformer means there will be additional heat which I have to get rid off. |
|
 John GaltForward, MarchPremium join:2004-09-30 Happy Camp kudos:3 | reply to lutful said by lutful:You should provide separate surge protection at that end connected to tower grounding system but do not let your electrician "bond" the tower ground to your building ground. A long exposed bonding cable will provide an unprotected path for massive lightning surge current that will fry any protection device at your building entry in a few milliseconds. Once again, this is WRONG.

If you had any understanding of the fundamentals of lightning protection and telecommunications site construction you would know that it is IMPERATIVE to bond the systems together. It is necessary to have a total solution to the problem, not just a hit-and-miss "do-as-little-as-possible" approach.
I find it curious that a tiny transformer with coil insulation of a few tenths of a millimeters is all of a sudden a "very safe method" of stopping your "massive lightning surge current".

That is like trying to stop a freight train with a single tissue. The solution is to give the freight train some place else to go.
I would strongly recommend that you STOP giving advice outside your area of expertise. -- A is A |
|
 | reply to ibliz If you need to provide surge supression on AC, use something built for this kind of thing. I always suggest, and pick first, products by Transtector. They do not make things that are cheap, so they are more expensive. But I can tell you that where other products fail, theirs will not.
120V protection: »www.transtector.com/productdetai···1101-338
And bond your ground systems.... -- Using a non-ports-system OS is like masturbating with a cheese grater
"No job is so important, and no service is so urgent that we cannot take the time to do it safely." -- AT&T |
|
 lutfulPremium join:2005-06-16 Ottawa, ON Reviews:
·TekSavvy DSL
1 edit | reply to John Galt I suggested 24V AC mainly to avoid NEC boogeymen. 
I hope my many posts consistently declare that all conductors of all cables need to be surge protected at the building entry. Does not matter if it is 12V or 24V or 48V DC or AC.
There is no argument about bonding either ...
Bond all surge protection devices for all cables entering the shack and ground with shortest possible cable.
Bond all surge protection devices for all cables entering the home and ground with shortest possible cable.
With a M.Sc in EE, I hope I am capable of understanding the fundamentals as well as you are. I worked almost 20 years in IC and system design that always included adding ESD/surge protection.
But it is true that my "still evolving" understanding of outdoor lightning/surge protection comes from mainly self- study of available literature and a few field experiments last summer.
I know most WISPs continue following the current NEC wisdom but I only want people to think a bit before connecting that long "bonding" cable between the two grounding systems.
*** Clarification for very common PoE CPE setups ***
Please bond the grounding lug of PoE surge protector to building safety ground with shortest possible copper strap or cable.
My dissenting comments only relate to "bonding" distant WISP equipment to your building safety ground using a long cable.  |
|
 | reply to AMD Phreak said by AMD Phreak:If you need to provide surge supression on AC, use something built for this kind of thing. I always suggest, and pick first, products by Transtector. They do not make things that are cheap, so they are more expensive. But I can tell you that where other products fail, theirs will not. 120V protection: » www.transtector.com/productdetai···1101-338And bond your ground systems.... I have no doubt that Transector is one of the best surge arrestors available. I know since it is the only POE surge arrestor recommended in the Orthogon manual. But the drawback is it is a hassle to install and replace, not to mention the price. So in the case of POE, I used Citel instead. For AC surge-arrestor, Iam looking for something that I can replace by myself in 10 minutes without having to call a professional electrician. Also, it will be hard to convince the electrician to climb up an 120ft tower. |
|
 John GaltForward, MarchPremium join:2004-09-30 Happy Camp kudos:3 | said by ibliz:For AC surge-arrestor, I am looking for something that I can replace by myself in 10 minutes without having to call a professional electrician. Also, it will be hard to convince the electrician to climb up an 120ft tower. I recommend this for about $80:
»www.tripplite.com/products/produ···uctID=95
Tripplite manufactures the finest quality products. Note the $10,000 no-BS replacement policy. -- A is A |
|
 | Johns suggestion was the same one I was thinking of. |
|
|
|
 lutfulPremium join:2005-06-16 Ottawa, ON Reviews:
·TekSavvy DSL
1 edit | reply to John Galt
Please note the installation guidelines in the user manual and warranty terms including this statement "Coverage is excluded where a suitable environment for the protection device is not provided, including, but not limited to, lack of a proper safety ground."
These indoor systems provide 600J MOV protection on Hot-Ground, Hot-Neutral and Neutral-Ground only. The surge energy is diverted through AC cable's ground conductor to building safety ground.
The MOV ignition photo shows what could happen outdoors during a close lightning strike. Luckily the MOVs will die after a few distant strikes leaving equipment un-protected.
Outdoor lightning/surge protectors often use GDT+MOV or MOV+SAD or GDT+MOV+SAD combos and divert thousands of Joules of surge energy to a robust ground lug which is connected to very real ground very close to protector and not hundreds of feet away to your home safety ground.
The "ground" conductor of an outdoor AC cable will rise rapidly to kilovolts during a lightning surge and needs to be protected as well as other conductors.
Please take my advice with many grains of salt as long as you do not attract lightning.  |
|
 John GaltForward, MarchPremium join:2004-09-30 Happy Camp kudos:3 | said by lutful:The "ground" conductor of an outdoor AC cable will rise rapidly to kilovolts during a lightning surge and needs to be protected as well as other conductors. Which gets back to my point of having a total solution to the problem and not just scabbing some stuff together. -- A is A |
|
 lutfulPremium join:2005-06-16 Ottawa, ON | I agree. 
People should not put a Tripp-Lite in a NEMA4 box on their tower and consider their equipment and house protected. |
|
 | Yup. I just contacted Tripp-Lite and they do not recommend any of their surge-suppressors for outdoor use. |
|
 | After doing more research on the subject, I find it is much safer and less hassle to just use DC to power tower-top equipment. I am going to get this DC power protector :
»www.polyphaser.com/productdetail···IX-1DC12
It is weatherised too (hopefully that mean it is outdoor rated). Anyone ever use this before ??
The downside is, I will have to use at least 14 AWG size wires for the DC powerline in order for the voltage drop to be within the tolerable range. Anyone thinks this is a bad idea ? |
|
 | Those are good units. I have used the CAT5 models. They have a rubber gasket around the lid and the gland nuts on the ends seal super tight. I have not had to replace any parts yet, but the modular design allows fast change-out of blown protectors.
If 14AWG is required to mitigate the DC power drop, then so be it. -- "No job is so important, and no service is so urgent that we cannot take the time to do it safely." -- AT&T |
|
 | Hi AMD Phreak,
Does the Polyphaser IX series come with detailed instructions manual ? The polyphaser site dont give much technical information on their products. When you said modular design, do you mean we can buy spare protector ?
I took a look at the CAT5 protector and I might replace my cheap-looking Citels with Polyphaser. But how come they only have 4 connector terminals on each side of the link ? Also do you have to use punch-down tools to connect the CAT5 to the unit ? |
|
 | From what I recall it did not. The terminal blocks on the protectors are labeled clearly though.
As far as modular: Yeah you can just order the spare PCB protectors and keep a set on hand. You don't have to order an entire unit.
For the CAT5 units, you use set screws. There are 4 pairs per side. It's set up just like the older Canopy Transtectors, if you ever have used those. Just keep your pair twists all the way until you enter the block. -- "No job is so important, and no service is so urgent that we cannot take the time to do it safely." -- AT&T |
|
 UHFAll static, all day, ForeverPremium,MVM join:2002-05-24 Reviews:
·Callcentric
·DIRECTV
·surpasshosting
·Dish Network
·VOIPo
| reply to ibliz Not familiar with that particular unit, but I've used a lot of Polyphaser stuff over the years, mostly on RF and telco lines.
But the single most important thing with lightning protection is your grounding/bonding system.
Polyphaser sells a great book on lightning protection. Best $20 you will ever spend. I HIGHLY recommend it. |
|