Re: Terrible Pricing

Author	All Replies
Matt All noise, no signal. Premium join:2003-07-20 Jamestown, NC kudos:12	reply to jstack Re: Terrible Pricing said by jstack: AT&T has 3.0/512 for $24.99 with not contract. + POTS = $40+ a month -- Use the OS tool for the job.
	to forum · permalink · 2007-02-26 18:17:14 ·

Dominokat "Hi" Premium join:2002-08-06 Boothbay, ME kudos:2 Reviews: ·RoadRunner Cable 1 edit	said by Matt: said by jstack: AT&T has 3.0/512 for $24.99 with not contract. + POTS = $40+ a month POTS here STARTS at 40+ p/mo.(after added fees and tax) Let alone adding DSL to the mix. -- I don’t think I’m quite ready to have my molecules compressed into a data stream.
	to forum · permalink · 2007-02-26 18:19:22 ·
Matt All noise, no signal. Premium join:2003-07-20 Jamestown, NC kudos:12	said by Dominokat: said by Matt: said by jstack: AT&T has 3.0/512 for $24.99 with not contract. + POTS = $40+ a month POTS here STARTS at 40+ p/mo. Let alone adding DSL to the mix. I was providing the benefit of the doubt, so some Yahoo doesn't come along and post an ad for a basic dry pair or something for like $9.99/month. -- Use the OS tool for the job.
	to forum · permalink · 2007-02-26 18:20:41 ·
RayW Premium join:2001-09-01 Layton, UT kudos:1	reply to Matt said by Matt: said by jstack: AT&T has 3.0/512 for $24.99 with not contract. + POTS = $40+ a month Which most people have anyway. For me, "Cable-TV or Digital Voice customer" would be an extra expense if I chose to degrade my service and go with Comcast. -- I am not lost, I find myself every time.
	to forum · permalink · 2007-02-26 18:23:10 ·
RideRed Vista needs a popup blocker for Vista Premium join:2005-06-18 USA	reply to Matt said by Matt: said by jstack: AT&T has 3.0/512 for $24.99 with not contract. + POTS = $40+ a month Comcast does the same thing with their $15 how dare you not have our crappy CATV penalty. Thankfully Time Warner's is only $5. -- There's only 10 types of people in this world. Those who understand binary, and those who don't. 
	to forum · permalink · 2007-02-26 18:26:13 ·
dadkins Can you do Blu? Premium,MVM join:2003-09-26 Hercules, CA kudos:18 1 edit	reply to RayW said by RayW: said by Matt: said by jstack: AT&T has 3.0/512 for $24.99 with not contract. + POTS = $40+ a month Which most people have anyway. For me, "Cable-TV or Digital Voice customer" would be an extra expense if I chose to degrade my service and go with Comcast. As opposed to me, having cable TV AND Comcast HSI. Gotta have TV, 8mbps for $52.95 is worth it to me! I have the fastest residential connection in Hercules! CDP(not CDV) here - NO POTS! DSL would not be cost vs speed effective(efficient?) for me. 384/384? Oh HELL NO! -- Think outside the Fox... Opera
	to forum · permalink · 2007-02-26 18:41:14 ·
cdru Go Colts Premium,MVM join:2003-05-14 Fort Wayne, IN kudos:5 Reviews: ·Frontier FiOS	reply to Matt I understand the point you are trying to make, but I would bet a considerable sum of money that the majority of people that would subscribe to this "lite" service already are paying for a POTS line, so it's no additional expense above and beyond what they already are paying. -- Go Colts
	to forum · permalink · 2007-02-26 18:46:26 ·
Matt All noise, no signal. Premium join:2003-07-20 Jamestown, NC kudos:12	reply to RayW said by RayW: said by Matt: said by jstack: AT&T has 3.0/512 for $24.99 with not contract. + POTS = $40+ a month Which most people have anyway. For me, "Cable-TV or Digital Voice customer" would be an extra expense if I chose to degrade my service and go with Comcast. Most people being who? I can honestly say, I don't know a single person who has POTS. Not one. Matter of fact, I don't know anyone who has DSL either, so perhaps it's a regional thing. -- Use the OS tool for the job.
	to forum · permalink · 2007-02-26 18:47:36 ·
Matt All noise, no signal. Premium join:2003-07-20 Jamestown, NC kudos:12	reply to cdru said by cdru: I understand the point you are trying to make, but I would bet a considerable sum of money that the majority of people that would subscribe to this "lite" service already are paying for a POTS line, so it's no additional expense above and beyond what they already are paying. Not true. My sister inquired about this the other day because she wants a low-cost broadband service and can no longer justify paying $45+ a month for a service she doesn't use. She is cell only by the way. -- Use the OS tool for the job.
	to forum · permalink · 2007-02-26 18:49:08 ·
RideRed Vista needs a popup blocker for Vista Premium join:2005-06-18 USA	reply to Matt said by Matt: Most people being who? I can honestly say, I don't know a single person who has POTS. Not one. Matter of fact, I don't know anyone who has DSL either, so perhaps it's a regional thing. NO ONE you know has POTS? Not a single person you know? I find that hard to believe. Not a single friend, neighbor or relative has POTS? -- There's only 10 types of people in this world. Those who understand binary, and those who don't. 
	to forum · permalink · 2007-02-26 18:56:04 ·
RayW Premium join:2001-09-01 Layton, UT kudos:1	reply to Matt said by Matt: Most people being who? I can honestly say, I don't know a single person who has POTS. Not one. Matter of fact, I don't know anyone who has DSL either, so perhaps it's a regional thing. Not many friends? In my immediate neighborhood for POTs: Going east - yes, no (VoIP and cell, and is a WISP owner). Across the street going south - no (cell only), yes, yes, yes, don't know, don't know, yes. Across the street other side going south - yes, yes, yes, don't know, yes, don't know. Across the street going east - yes, yes, empty, yes, yes, don't know. There are others, but those listed are the ones within sight. -- I am not lost, I find myself every time.
	to forum · permalink · 2007-02-26 19:15:24 ·
MrChupacabra Premium join:2003-03-26 Florida	reply to dadkins But Dadkins. You've been asking for symetric speeds for a while.
	to forum · permalink · 2007-02-26 19:44:28 ·
David I have a son- d3 Premium,VIP join:2002-05-30 Granite City, IL kudos:68 Reviews: ·AT&T Southwest ·DIRECTV ·AT&T Midwest ·Google Voice	reply to Matt said by Matt: Most people being who? I can honestly say, I don't know a single person who has POTS. Not one. Hi! my name is David and I have a pots line my wife uses quite frequently to talk to her friends. said by Matt: Matter of fact, I don't know anyone who has DSL either, so perhaps it's a regional thing. Yea I have one of those too. One of them 6Mbps/768k speed ones. Nice to meet you Matt -- If you have a topic in the direct forum please reply to it or a post of mine, I get a notification when you do this. Koetting Ford, Granite City, illinois... YOU'RE FIRED!!
	to forum · permalink · 2007-02-26 19:45:38 ·
dadkins Can you do Blu? Premium,MVM join:2003-09-26 Hercules, CA kudos:18	reply to MrChupacabra Yeah... but just a wee bit faster than YAWN per second.
	to forum · permalink · 2007-02-26 20:38:35 ·
asdfghjklzx5 Premium join:2004-05-03 kudos:1	reply to Matt I only know one or two people without POTS. Personally, I would never get rid of my POTS line to try and save on internet access. 100% reliable 911 access is worth the $20/mo to me. Maybe when the kids are grown up. -- Hate your enemies. Save your friends. Find your place. Speak the truth.
	to forum · permalink · 2007-02-26 20:52:19 ·
iLive4Fusion Premium join:2006-07-13 Reviews: ·AT&T U-Verse ·T-Mobile US ·AT&T Wireless Br.. ·ViaTalk ·Verizon Broadban..	said by asdfghjklzx5: I only know one or two people without POTS. Personally, I would never get rid of my POTS line to try and save on internet access. 100% reliable 911 access is worth the $20/mo to me. Maybe when the kids are grown up. In my area everyone was without POTS for over 14 hours because of a Central Office problem. A few weeks ago the tandem that connected people in my area to the 911 centers failed and nobody on my Central Office had the ability to call 911 for a few hours. I would not say POTS is all that reliable either....
	to forum · permalink · 2007-02-26 22:56:06 ·
NormanS Premium,MVM join:2001-02-14 San Jose, CA kudos:4 Reviews: ·SONIC.NET ·Pacific Bell - SBC	reply to Matt POTS doesn't cost $40+ a month; not here, anyway. Comcast cable Internet requires, at the least, Basic TV for $13 and some change, around here, anyway, to get cable Internet for $42.95 a month. Without it, I'd have to pay $56.95 a month. -- Norman ~Oh Lord, why have you come ~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum
	to forum · permalink · 2007-02-26 23:43:42 ·
dvd536 as Mr. Pink as they come Premium join:2001-04-27 Phoenix, AZ kudos:4	reply to Matt said by Matt: said by jstack: AT&T has 3.0/512 for $24.99 with not contract. + POTS = $40+ a month Even more after you add in all those BS fees! -- You can never be too rich, too thin or have too much Bandwidth
	to forum · permalink · 2007-02-27 00:06:08 ·
cdru Go Colts Premium,MVM join:2003-05-14 Fort Wayne, IN kudos:5	reply to Matt I said majority. I didn't say all. Your sister would obviously not fall in the majority category. -- Go Colts
	to forum · permalink · 2007-02-27 05:52:55 ·
Ape named Ape @charter.com	reply to RideRed It's both a generational and a regional thing. In areas where the local phone company really rips people off on POTS service (which is a fair chunk of the country, especially when you get outside the major population centers), people tend to just use their cell phones and forgo the POTS. But also, people over 50 are FAR more likely to have a POTS line than people under 25. And to throw in a third variable, the more comfortable someone is with computers, the more likely they seem to be to use an alternative to POTS (such as VoIP or a cell phone), unless of course they need the POTS line for a dial-up modem or perhaps a FAX machine.
	to forum · permalink · 2007-02-27 08:20:18 ·

Comcast Testing 'Economy' Tier? > Terrible Pricing