Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » In Home Networking: HomePNA » Key Part of the Article
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Gives me a warm fuzzy »
« It worked well for me  
AuthorAll Replies


wilbilt
Pronto Resurrected
Premium
join:2004-01-11
Oroville, CA

reply to Matt
Re: Key Part of the Article

said by Matt See Profile :

I think a key part of the article is that the exec stated they are starting to consider the copper wire inside your home as part of THEIR network.

Very interesting.
They pretty much lost that battle 30+ years ago. Your home = your wiring. Many older homes have daisy-chained phone and coax wiring, which is useless for today's technologies.

It does bring concern, though...first the re-assimilation of Ma Bell, and then the "we own your wiring" thing. Curious.
--
We were taking a vote when the ground came up and hit us.

PDXPLT

join:2003-12-04
Banks, OR


1 edit
said by wilbilt :

Many older homes have daisy-chained phone and coax wiring, which is useless for today's technologies.
Not true. Both MoCA and HomePNA are designed to work well on such topologies. If they didn't, why would they bother?


wilbilt
Pronto Resurrected
Premium
join:2004-01-11
Oroville, CA

said by PDXPLT See Profile :

said by wilbilt :

Many older homes have daisy-chained phone and coax wiring, which is useless for today's technologies.
Not true. Both MoCA and HomePNA are designed to work well on such topologies. If they didn't, why would they bother?
Oh noes....say it ain't so! I think of my parents' home, built in 1968, with a single loop of untwisted, unshielded, and unrestrained phone wiring going from room to room. They want to pass data on that Chit? And claim "ownership"?

The spurious emissions alone will cause 3-eyed babies soon enough, you'll see...;)
--
We were taking a vote when the ground came up and hit us.

Claybraker

join:2002-04-13
none

reply to wilbilt
said by wilbilt See Profile :

Many older homes have daisy-chained phone and coax wiring, which is useless for today's technologies.

Back when I used to try and make HPNA 2 work, looped wiring was fine. It was the newer houses with CAT5 home runs (bridge-tap) that gave me ulcers.

I think you're reading too much into this about the DeathStar owning your inside wiring. It's really very simple. In order to meet customer expectations, they've got to get the signal from the NID to the device inside the premise.
Forums » In Home Networking: HomePNAGives me a warm fuzzy »
« It worked well for me  


Saturday, 28-Nov 00:52:41 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [121] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [112] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [96] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [87] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [70] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [69] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [64] Verizon CEO: Hulu Will Be Dead Soon
· [62] Thanksgiving Open Thread
· [44] Weekend Open Thread
· [40] EFF Wages War On Fine Print
Most people now reading
· [Newsgroups] Newzleech down? [Filesharing Software]
· DIR-655 1.31 Firmware available [D-Link]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· [Scam] Cruise line mail? [Spam, Scam and Phishbusters]
· So we need a legitimate reason to use a lot of bandwidth? [TekSavvy]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Leveling to 85 [World of Warcraft]
· HOW-TO: QoS and Tomato (fixes "choppy voice") [MagicJack]
· What to use while demonoid is down? [Filesharing Software]