republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » RIAA 'Settlement-o-matic' Site Taunts You » Wow
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

Asmodeus

join:2004-05-26
Spring Valley, CA

reply to djtim21
Re: Wow

said by djtim21 See Profile :

said by vpoko See Profile :

The government needs to go after RIAA for racketeering, this is like the mob selling protection.
No this is racketeering - "Pay now or we don't break your legs we won't sue you"

Someone needs to step on them. It's like if I own a small coffee shop in a strip mall, and Starbucks wants to move in, but Starbucks comes to you and says "Pay us $3500 bucks, and we won't put you out of business". Somehow this isn't legal, but yet the *IAA's get away with it.
bad analogy... because starbucks doesn't even do that... instead they go around the process and sign exclusivity deals with the holding company that owns the strip mall... therefore they legally are the only ones allowed to sell brewed coffee within the confines of the strip mall and no other retailer like them can... fast food retailers do it too... while not illegal, they are anti-competitive, but tha'ts life isn't it...

what the riaa does by setting up this mechanism is that legally you are being accused of doing something without having them go through the motions of proving in a court of law that you did... so instead, they say, "hey, absolve yourself of any wrong doing and give us the appropriate amount of money to make this go away or else..." and there you have, legalized racketeering and there isn't a damn thing anyone can do about it... the legal profession is a monopoly and every lawyer works for that monopoly regardless if they are on the side of right or wrong, prosecutor or defense... you are stuck with it and now we will see if this type of cancer within the monopoly is worth getting rid of...


calvoiper

join:2003-03-31
Belvedere Tiburon, CA

OK, so we need more careful controls on who can sue who for what? I agree.

We should adopt the legal system in use in the rest of the world except for the US--loser pays all attorney fees. That would mean the xyAAs would have to pay all attorney fees when they sue someone who wasn't illegally downloading.

Of course, that would mean that people who have been illegally downloading would pay the xyAA's legal fees as well.

calvoiper
--
VoIP--the death knell of remaining voice monopolies!
Forums » RIAA 'Settlement-o-matic' Site Taunts You


Friday, 04-Dec 22:07:28 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [163] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [145] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [126] Comcast Makes NBC Universal Acquisition Official
· [104] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [101] Google Invades ISP, OpenDNS Turf With Google Public DNS
· [83] FCC Ponders Moving From PSTN To IP Voice
· [81] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [74] Sprint Defuses GPS Privacy Media Bomb
· [70] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [69] The Bandwidth Hog Does Not Exist
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· Farewell [Bell Canada]
· DNS options, what are YOU using? [TekSavvy]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Evading throttling with uTP / uTorrent 1.9a [TekSavvy]
· [Unlock] TUTORIAL: VONAGE WRTP54G/RTP300 WITH 5.01.04 [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Google takes aim at browser redirection [Security]
· IMG 1.7 (IMG Updates and Discussion) [Verizon FIOS TV]