Topic 'Re: Well I guess' in forum '' - dslreports.com http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Well-I-guess-17959064 en Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:58:41 EDT Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:58:41 EDT Re: Well I guess http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Well-I-guess-17966833 said by rjbasye:

For the price of an HD Radio you can get 2yr subscription to Satellite Radio. HD Radio is not a national service either with limited signal range.
Don't forget to add in the fact that you get to listen to those commercials in brilliant HD quality on HD Radio. :)
--
My Domain
Nightfall's Hockey and Life Journal]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Well-I-guess-17966833 Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:10:10 EDT Re: Well I guess http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Well-I-guess-17966805 said by BabyBear:

Come on, you know he was referring to the service, not the equipment.
There are two costs you have to look at when choosing any service. The cost of the equipment and the service. When he says HD Radio is free, thats not accurate becuase you have to pay for the equipment. Its not like you can just flip a switch and listen to it without the hardware purchase.
--
My Domain
Nightfall's Hockey and Life Journal]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Well-I-guess-17966805 Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:05:44 EDT Re: Well I guess http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Well-I-guess-17965625 said by jtudor:

said by P Ness:

together under one and raise prices 10x with only the same number of channels today....
So you are saying that a monthly subscription to the combined company would cost $129.50 a month :o for one radio and each additional radio under a family plan would cost $69.90 a month?

If you believe this you are out of your mind!!!! :D

Nobody is stupid enough to raise prices that much. Any idiot knows that they would lose all their customers and be out of business within 60 days, if not sooner if they tried something like that. I believe you need to seriously (Siriusly??) :D :D rethink your statement.
NO i said they "could" not that they "would"...
--
www.stopfcc.com I do not think the government needs to restrict free speech especially on a device that has an off knob.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Well-I-guess-17965625 Thu, 08 Mar 2007 10:41:38 EDT Re: Well I guess http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Well-I-guess-17965227 said by P Ness:

together under one and raise prices 10x with only the same number of channels today....
So you are saying that a monthly subscription to the combined company would cost $129.50 a month :o for one radio and each additional radio under a family plan would cost $69.90 a month?

If you believe this you are out of your mind!!!! :D

Nobody is stupid enough to raise prices that much. Any idiot knows that they would lose all their customers and be out of business within 60 days, if not sooner if they tried something like that. I believe you need to seriously (Siriusly??) :D :D rethink your statement.
--
Best of luck

"Do, or Do not, there is no try!" Yoda

]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Well-I-guess-17965227 Thu, 08 Mar 2007 09:14:48 EDT Re: Well I guess http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Well-I-guess-17962466 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Well-I-guess-17962466 Wed, 07 Mar 2007 20:02:10 EDT Re: Well I guess http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Well-I-guess-17961254 said by phattieg:

I think the audio quality on either provider isn't worth monthly subscription fee's. Sounds too compressed. I'd rather have HD radio, which is free.
I was looking at some new (home) speakers a couple weeks ago. They couldn't get any FM reception in the store, so they hooked up an XM receiver. It sounded so bad that I made them get a CD to demo with - the XM made a 128k .mp3 sound good by comparison. I knew it was bad, but this was the first time I ever heard it on higher end equipment.

I've heard the same claims made about HD radio, but haven't actually tried an HD receiver.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Well-I-guess-17961254 Wed, 07 Mar 2007 16:37:19 EDT Re: Well I guess http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Well-I-guess-17960666 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Well-I-guess-17960666 Wed, 07 Mar 2007 14:49:39 EDT Re: Well I guess http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Well-I-guess-17960365 said by phattieg:

said by BF69:

When he turns down this merger and one of them goes out of business and the remaining one has no competition and can raise prices at will, that'll be better for consumers.
I think the audio quality on either provider isn't worth monthly subscription fee's. Sounds too compressed. I'd rather have HD radio, which is free.
You still have to pay for a HD Radio, so it isn't like that is free.
--
My Domain
Nightfall's Hockey and Life Journal]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Well-I-guess-17960365 Wed, 07 Mar 2007 13:53:12 EDT Re: Well I guess http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Well-I-guess-17960254 said by BF69:

When he turns down this merger and one of them goes out of business and the remaining one has no competition and can raise prices at will, that'll be better for consumers.
I think the audio quality on either provider isn't worth monthly subscription fee's. Sounds too compressed. I'd rather have HD radio, which is free.
--
SIPPhone/Gizmo # 17476200648 / PIMPNET Chatline / Ran by Asterisk & Slackware 10.1.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Well-I-guess-17960254 Wed, 07 Mar 2007 13:33:17 EDT Re: Well I guess http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Well-I-guess-17959770 said by morbo:

said by Nightfall:

What I don't believe is the FUD that this new company will raise prices or the one left will raise prices.
said by the man with no long term memory
I take it thats a no? Thought so. :)
--
My Domain
Nightfall's Hockey and Life Journal]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Well-I-guess-17959770 Wed, 07 Mar 2007 12:05:31 EDT Re: Well I guess http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Well-I-guess-17959766 said by n2jtx:

They both agreed at the time their licenses were issued that neither provider would try to acquire the other. That agreement is still in force unless they are now claiming it was just a joke.
WRONG

the agreement is that they would both get a spectrum to utilize that would not overlap. they actually agreed that within 7 years radio's would be built that could accept both services.

it said that no one company can have both spectrums. so in theory they could give back one spectrum fold the company together under one and raise prices 10x with only the same number of channels today....
--
www.stopfcc.com I do not think the government needs to restrict free speech especially on a device that has an off knob.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Well-I-guess-17959766 Wed, 07 Mar 2007 12:04:08 EDT Re: Well I guess http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Well-I-guess-17959750 said by n2jtx:

They both agreed at the time their licenses were issued that neither provider would try to acquire the other. That agreement is still in force unless they are now claiming it was just a joke.
Technically, neither is trying to acquire the other: it's a "merger of equals". Acquisition implies that one owns a controlling stake of the other. Merger of equals implies that neither owns a controlling stake of the other.

-tom
--
"Experience should teach us to be most on our guard to protect liberty when the government's purposes are beneficial. The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well meaning but without understanding." -Louis D Brandeis]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Well-I-guess-17959750 Wed, 07 Mar 2007 12:01:20 EDT Re: Well I guess http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Well-I-guess-17959703 said by Nightfall:

What I don't believe is the FUD that this new company will raise prices or the one left will raise prices.said by the man with no long term memory]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Well-I-guess-17959703 Wed, 07 Mar 2007 11:51:55 EDT Re: Well I guess http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Well-I-guess-17959466 said by BF69:

When he turns down this merger and one of them goes out of business and the remaining one has no competition and can raise prices at will, that'll be better for consumers.
This is a damned if you do and a damned if you don't situation. What I don't believe is the FUD that this new company will raise prices or the one left will raise prices. Guess I haven't read the plan that most people here have read. Maybe you can provide a link to proof? :)
--
My Domain
Nightfall's Hockey and Life Journal]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Well-I-guess-17959466 Wed, 07 Mar 2007 11:08:47 EDT Re: Well I guess http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Well-I-guess-17959457 said by BF69:

When he turns down this merger and one of them goes out of business and the remaining one has no competition and can raise prices at will, that'll be better for consumers.
It's not like either service would just stop working one day.

It's like in any other business. Once they declare bankruptcy, and can get out from underneath all the bad choices that were made, someone will buy it.

Even if both of them went bankrupt, they would both exist.
--
FCC, PLEASE KILL THE MERGER BEFORE THE MERGER KILLS SATRAD!]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Well-I-guess-17959457 Wed, 07 Mar 2007 11:07:17 EDT Re: Well I guess http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Well-I-guess-17959138 --
I support the right to keep and arm bears.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Well-I-guess-17959138 Wed, 07 Mar 2007 10:15:22 EDT Well I guess http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Well-I-guess-17959064 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Well-I-guess-17959064 Wed, 07 Mar 2007 10:03:11 EDT