site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
48
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


Titus Pullo
I came, I saw, I slept

join:2004-06-26
kudos:1
Reviews:
·Embarq Now Centu..

Shoot, aim, ready

Once again, the point is missed due to a forest - trees thing. The article is pointing out the bandwidth bind that providers are going to face very soon at the present rate of internet growth, and the fact that Comcast's current stance is to play a game of pretend (or don't ask, we won't tell) and go on with business as usual. These companies do business like our government -- or is it the other way around? -- and sell impression by spinning reality to suit a consumer paradise at inflated prices only because they've turned the word regulation into a pejorative and are creating mini geo monopolies.

We all know why Comcast doesn't want to publish a cap: the question is what are they going to do when their back is against the bandwidth wall they pretend doesn't exist?

Put those frying pans over your arse, is my advice

CLEVELTECH

join:2006-12-21
02107

Eventually Comcast is going to be facing a federal class-action suit. It's only a matter of time.


Monday, 28-May 15:41:06 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics