<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>I was looking forward to this working well in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r18012512</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 03:51:26 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 03:51:26 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: I was looking forward to this working well</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18012710</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/466028"><b>RayW</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Dagda1175 <A HREF="/useremail/u/413020"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>It only makes sense that the OS developers would be the best ones to protect it.  Ideally you'd want a program that meshes itself around the OS like a net with the bit versions of pegs holding them together.  The best I can see an outside source doing is sitting between the OS and possible threats.  So far that hasnt proven good enough.<br> </DIV>Ideally you would have an OS that was written right and did not need a bandage (can't say band-aid because that is a legal trademark and we might get sued). <br><br>I always find it suspect when I buy something and the seller goes "Oh, do you need to buy protection for that.".  To me that means the seller has a vested interest in NOT making the best product in order to sell you the protection.  <br><SMALL>--<br>I am not lost, I find myself every time.</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18012710</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 16:03:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>I was looking forward to this working well</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18012512</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/413020"><b>Dagda1175</b></A> : It only makes sense that the OS developers would be the best ones to protect it.  Ideally you'd want a program that meshes itself around the OS like a net with the bit versions of pegs holding them together.  The best I can see an outside source doing is sitting between the OS and possible threats.  So far that hasnt proven good enough.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18012512</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 15:23:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
