 levI think there is a target on my backPremium,Ex-mod 2002-08 join:2001-05-30 Chicago, IL kudos:2 Reviews:
·AT&T Midwest
| Yahoo treating mail via smtpauth.sbcglobal.net as bulk? Anytime I send to a yahoo (or yahoo hosted like sbcglobal.net) address from my desktop using my sbcglobal.net address and smtpauth.sbcglobal.net as my SMTP server, I'm finding the mail winds up as bulk.
Am I alone in this, or is this universal? |
|
 nwrickertsand groperPremium,MVM join:2004-09-04 Geneva, IL kudos:7 Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse
| I don't much use my ameritech/yahoo mail, except to periodically check the size of the bulk folder. However, I occasionally send a short test message, usually from my work system, and 9 times out of 10 that finishes up in the bulk folder.
I have been wondering whether plain text email, with no MIME headers at all, is automatically classified as bulk. -- AT&T dsl; Westell 2200 modem/router; SuSE 10.1; firefox 1.5.0.10 |
|
 | reply to lev There as a change about 3 weeks ago regarding AT&T use of POP and SMTP carries. Those who use Outlook and Outlook Express and some other programs would then need to change the actual names of their respective POP and SMTP carrier to reflect the change that AT&T made to its use with AT/Yahoo email distribution. The actual email address showing an sbcglobal.net would remain the same but there were some other changes.Open your email client software and make the appropriate changes.
Incoming (POP) should read: pop.att.yahoo.com Incoming mail server POP3 (pop.att.yahoo.com w/ SLL Encryp- tion required) Incoming mail port #995 (POP3)
Outgoing (SMTP) should read: smtp.att.yahoo.com Outgoing mail server SMTP (smtp.att.yahoo.com (with SLL Encrytption and Authentication Required) Outgoing mail port #465 (SMTP)
Password: Remains th same Email address: Remains the same
When finished configuring the email account, click "OK" and apply and "finish" to the enable the new settings.
These settings have been in place for the last 3 weeks. If one doesn't change their email software, they might then lose some important email and everything could be dumped into "bulk" folder.
For most email client software programs, one has the ability to the :"test" their new settings. Its advisable to do so. One might have to do the procedure twice.
NOTE: These changes were only for POP3 based email client software programs. If one resorts to using the AT&T/Yahoo web based software, no changes will have to be made. 
|
|
 NormanSPremium,MVM join:2001-02-14 San Jose, CA kudos:4 Reviews:
·SONIC.NET
·Pacific Bell - SBC
1 edit | reply to lev It doesn't appear to be universal. This one went straight to the Inbox:
X-Apparently-To: %User_ID%@yahoo.com via 68.142.199.149; Sat, 17 Mar 2007 16:46:25 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [207.115.36.82] Return-Path: <%User_ID%@aosake.net> Authentication-Results: mta179.mail.re3.yahoo.com from=aosake.net; domainkeys=neutral (no sig) Received: from 207.115.36.82 (EHLO nlpi053.sbcis.sbc.com) (207.115.36.82) by mta179.mail.re3.yahoo.com with SMTP; Sat, 17 Mar 2007 16:46:25 -0700 Received: from aosake.net (adsl-68-126-43-28.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net [68.126.43.28]) (authenticated bits=0) by nlpi053.sbcis.sbc.com (8.13.8 smtpauth/dk/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l2HNjxxS011739 for <%User_ID%@yahoo.com>; Sat, 17 Mar 2007 18:46:01 -0500 Received: from Spooler by aosake.net (Mercury/32 v4.01b) ID MO000002; 17 Mar 2007 16:46:20 -0700 Received: from spooler by aosake.net (Mercury/32 v4.01b); 17 Mar 2007 16:45:49 -0700 From: "NormanS" <%User__ID%@aosake.net> To: %User__ID%@yahoo.com Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 16:45:29 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [TEST] Will this be junked? Priority: normal X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.41) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body X-AC-Weight: [### ] -599 X-CC-Diagnostic: Header Organization contains "" (-599) Message-ID: <36CCCB4CE0@aosake.net> Content-Length: 97 EDIT:
Added the rest of the headers for the MIME type. This is a "plain text" message.
-- Norman ~Oh Lord, why have you come ~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum |
|
 NormanSPremium,MVM join:2001-02-14 San Jose, CA kudos:4 Reviews:
·SONIC.NET
·Pacific Bell - SBC
| reply to rexarolla said by rexarolla:There as a change about 3 weeks ago regarding AT&T use of POP and SMTP carries. People using 'smtpauth.sbcglobal.net' are not affected by the change. I am still using that server, and it works just fine. -- Norman ~Oh Lord, why have you come ~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum |
|
 levI think there is a target on my backPremium,Ex-mod 2002-08 join:2001-05-30 Chicago, IL kudos:2 | reply to NormanS Was the originating address in the Yahoo address book of the receiving address?
If not, then maybe there was some other funky yahoo trigger. |
|
 levI think there is a target on my backPremium,Ex-mod 2002-08 join:2001-05-30 Chicago, IL kudos:2 | reply to rexarolla Well aware of the change, rexarolla. As Norman said, smtpauth.sbcglobal.net has been apparently unaffected, until posssibly now.
That's why I posted here, to search for more data. |
|
 dxiv join:2005-04-12 Wheaton, IL | reply to rexarolla said by rexarolla:These settings have been in place for the last 3 weeks. If one doesn't change their email software, they might then lose some important email and everything could be dumped into "bulk" folder. Does this apply to legacy @ameritech.net too? I am a bit puzzled that I have received no notice of any such change recently, though I get other useless mailings from att/yahoo regularly, some of them marked as [bulk] no less Thanks. |
|
 levI think there is a target on my backPremium,Ex-mod 2002-08 join:2001-05-30 Chicago, IL kudos:2 | Depends what you mean by legacy.
If you're using mailhost.chi.ameritech.net, I don't think that it applies.
If you have an ameritech.net address but you're using pop.xxx.yahoo.com then it will. |
|
 dxiv join:2005-04-12 Wheaton, IL | said by lev:If you have an ameritech.net address but you're using pop.xxx.yahoo.com then it will. That's my case. FWIW I didn't notice dropped emails in the past 3 weeks, though of course there may have been such which I don't know about, yet. Still confused about why a change potentially causing data loss was not announced in some official form. Thanks for the heads up. |
|
 | reply to lev For more clarification on AT&Ts change in email servers one can then got toe the respective AT&T web page that then explains all the details. There are about 10 separate email servers that are then combined into the new category " att.yahoo.com" This would also include any Ameritech customers. The web based email has changed. This is only for POP3 email accounts. the email address will remain the same as will the login in and password will remain the same. This is only a change of the email servers for the outgoing (SMTP) and the incoming POP3) servers giving them a name change and also port addresses. See the below URL for more details:
»helpme.att.net/article.php?item=287
Unfortunately, AT&T hasn't publicized this change in policy very much so a lot of people were left stranded. 
|
|
 dxiv join:2005-04-12 Wheaton, IL | Thanks for the pointer, maybe this should be made sticky here at least for a while. The link in the FAQ »AT&T Midwest/Ameritech FAQ now redirects to the same, but the FAQ itself still lists the old names and makes no mention of the ports.
Just out of curiosity, I pinged the old and new servers. Interestingly enough the POP ones resolve to the same name (pop-sbc.mail.yahoo4.akadns.net) with different IPs (pop.ameritech.yahoo.com 68.142.198.12, pop.att.yahoo.com 68.142.229.13). The SMTP ones resolve to the same smtp.sbc.mail.yahoo4.akadns.net 68.142.198.11. |
|
 nwrickertsand groperPremium,MVM join:2004-09-04 Geneva, IL kudos:7 Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse
| reply to rexarolla There are about 10 separate email servers that are then combined into the new category " att.yahoo.com" I think there was only ever one yahoo managed mail server. But it was known by multiple names to make it easier for users to remember the name. However, multiple names doesn't work well with SSL security, so they are asking you to use the name that is on their SSL certificate. -- AT&T dsl; Westell 2200 modem/router; SuSE 10.1; firefox 1.5.0.10 |
|
 | reply to rexarolla I think this one on the help page should be clarified:
Outgoing mail server: Outgoing server (SMTP) requires authentication The SMTP server for port 465 needs login with email address and password, but does not want "Secure password authentication" as discussed at »en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secure_Pas···tication. The login to the SMTP server will be SSL encrypted like everything else. |
|