 kapilThe Kapil
join:2000-04-26
Chicago, IL
1 edit | It can be safely assumed... ...that in any given dispute, the position taken by AT&T is the one that violates all moral, ethical and logical reasoning. For that reason alone, although there are many others, I support the rural carriers' position.
"Our service is meant for one-to-one calls, not one-to-many"....what utter and total bullshit. It's a god damned phone. If I pay for the said phone, I should be able to call whomever I damn well please. Your world delivered, my ass.
This is the same company that tried oh so hard to get companies like Focal and Level3, who owned big dial-up modem banks, declared as information service providers so that it didn't have to pay termination fees for calls to ISPs. Didn't work....that's why it went and bought Prodigy. |
|
rantou
join:2002-06-04
Richardson, TX | said by kapil:... Your world delivered, my ass. Very nicely said. |
|
fiberguyMy views are my own.Premium
join:2005-05-20
kudos:3 | said by rantou:said by kapil:... Your world delivered, my ass. Very nicely said. let me correct that for the reading public..
Your world, destroyed.
--
"Complaining is the least path of resistance for the self-reitchous and lazy ... those who also never take the time to point out a good fortune when the opportunity presents itself. It says a lot about one's moral character." - Unknown |
|
 sivranBack to Opera againPremium
join:2003-09-15
Arlington, TX
kudos:1 | They don't call it the AT&T Death Star for nothin, ya know.  |
|
