<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Future Internet Design in Technology Law &#x26; Politics</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r18041477</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:00:18 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:00:18 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Why?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18043909</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/239636"><b>tschmidt</b></A> : Agreed.<br><br>I was hoping others would chime in with how they think Internet should evolve over time. <br><br>The focus of the study should be clear when you check out who is funding it:<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://cleanslate.stanford.edu/companies.php" >cleanslate.stanford.edu/companies.php</A><br><br>/Tom]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18043909</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 09:14:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Why?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18041892</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/829559"><b>Estragon</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  tschmidt <A HREF="/useremail/u/239636"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR> I was disappointed the thread did not get much play ... </DIV>So why should it get much play? :hmm:<br><br>It appears to me like a research proposal doing research for researches sake.  Researchers are good at that.  But it is not clear that it will do anything useful.<br><br>The article claims that the research will start with a clean slate.  It then states seven characteristics of the "new" internet, which are anything but a clean slate.  These characteristics define the result that they want to get.  So what's the research going to do?<br><br>Consider two of the requirements:<br><br>(1) The network should be as ... available as the wire-line telephone network is today.<br><br>(4) The network should be profitable for those who provide service and build equipment ...<br><br>Meeting both of these requirements simultaneously is quite a challenge.  Requirement (4) makes me wonder who is funding the research.  And why?<br><br>And the article never really addresses (1) at all.  (4) is addressed, though.  Who is funding this "research"?<br><br>If we want to start with a clean slate, requirement (1) is an interesting idea.  But why is (4) a requirement?  Why does it have to be profitable?<br><br>Is profitability a requirement of the interstate highway system?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18041892</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 20:58:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Future Internet Design</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18041477</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/239636"><b>tschmidt</b></A> : There was a BBR front page news article last week about problems with the current Internet and a Stanford University study that seeks to address them.<br>&raquo;<A HREF="/shownews/82312">Let's Build a Better Internet</A><br><br>I was disappointed the thread did not get much play so I thought I'd repost it here to see if we can stimulate some discussion.<br><br>Here is a link to the <A HREF="http://cleanslate.stanford.edu/CleanSlateWhitepaperV2.pdf"> <B> "Clean-Slate Design for the Internet" </B> </A> posted at Stanford.<br><br>and my rebuttal post &raquo;<A HREF="/forum/remark,18014668">Clean-Slate Whitepaper Critique</A> <br><br>Rather then moan and groan about how awful things are it would be useful to kick around ideas for what the future should look like.<br><br>/Tom<br> ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18041477</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 19:42:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
