| ... meanwhile ... Verizon degrages their DSL offerings to ensure that VoIP fails to function thus ensuring that you have to take their voice solution even though the FCC says they have to sell naked DSL.
What kind of idiot decided to violate a patent that belongs to his competition in the first place? That was a pretty stupid strategic move. |
|
 dogmaXYZPremium
join:2002-08-15
Boulder City, NV
kudos:1 | said by AnonymousCoward :
...What kind of idiot decided to violate a patent that belongs to his competition in the first place? That was a pretty stupid strategic move.
I think that guy came from Research in Motion (RIM Blackberry).
What's even dumber is no real plan if they lost. Most of us armchair CEO's would have had "plan B (the work-around)" ready to go when the final gavel struck...and not wait until our stock was suspended to begin the process.
I have been with Packet8 for about 4 years, overall pretty good. My set up uses 2-line phones, where line 1 is the base/zero frills $11/Mo. SBC/AT?T pots, line 2 is Packet8 $22/Mo - unlimited-. Almost all inbound calls come into the pots, and outbound via packet8. This way if P8 goes down, we still have service. Cell phones not counted. |
|
| reply to AnonymousCoward
I probably shouldn't feed the troll, but here I go anyways.
said by AnonymousCoward :
Verizon degrages their DSL offerings to ensure that VoIP fails to function thus ensuring that you have to take their voice solution even though the FCC says they have to sell naked DSL. Do you have any proof of this? Or is that just your opinion?
said by AnonymousCoward :
What kind of idiot decided to violate a patent that belongs to his competition in the first place? That was a pretty stupid strategic move.
I'll agree with you there. |
|
