Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Sprint Unveils WiMax Launch City Lineup » Sprint targeting Wimax to cities; where it is least needed
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« Nothing in the Southeast, California, or NYC? Huh?  
AuthorAll Replies


Karl Bode
News Guy
join:2000-03-02
reply to TKJunkMail
Re: Sprint targeting Wimax to cities; where it is least needed

And why is fair and even deployment of service suddenly a concern for you, Tom? Don't have Sprint stock?


TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast

said by Karl Bode See Profile :

And why is fair and even deployment of service suddenly a concern for you, Tom? Don't have Sprint stock?
I have over 500 shares of Sprint thru one of my mutual funds. And the concern is that Sprint may actually do better by marketing Wimax to areas where their take rate would be much higher(rural areas) than in cities where the competition would be much stronger. I am sure Sprint did research on this, but I am not sure I agree that their current strategy will maximize their profits from their Wimax investments.
--
--
My BLOG
My Web Page


cpayne5

join:2004-01-06

They will have nearly all of their rural areas covered by RevA by the time they start deploying WiMax. At that time, the rural customers will be able to buy a RevA/WiMax card and subscribe to the cheaper service. I'm not too worried about rural areas being covered. (I live in a very rural area that has had RevA for ~4 months now.)
--
Hail To The Redskins


Karl Bode
News Guy
join:2000-03-02

Host:
Road Runner
PC gaming GAMES
PC gaming Tech
reply to TKJunkMail
quote:
I am not sure I agree that their current strategy will maximize their profits from their Wimax investments.
Keep in mind we're talking 2Mbps for an estimated $55 and no limits, which throttles Verizon and Cingular/AT&T 3G offerings. Targeting dense and relatively affluent large markets makes sense.

BosstonesOwn

join:2002-12-15
Everett, MA
clubs:
·Comcast

said by Karl Bode See Profile :

quote:
I am not sure I agree that their current strategy will maximize their profits from their Wimax investments.
Keep in mind we're talking 2Mbps for an estimated $55 and no limits, which throttles Verizon and Cingular/AT&T 3G offerings. Targeting dense and relatively affluent large markets makes sense.
Is that symmetrical ? If So Ill dump comcast in a second.
--
"It's always funny until someone gets hurt......and then it's absolutely friggin' hysterical!"


tc1uscg

join:2005-03-09
Saint Clair Shores, MI

reply to cpayne5
lest not forget that Sprint also has roaming agreements with ALTEL to roam w/Data. Maybe, just maybe, WIMAX will be a metro fad while rev A and B? could find it's way out in the boonies? Lets not also forget that a few years ago, sprint tried to deploy what was called Wireless broadband by using line of sight antennas in the Detroit metro area. It didn't go over very well at the time due to those big green leafy things we call trees.. It was a crash and burn for that service. Too bad. Those poor sprint techs spent a hour on my roof trying to get a good signal.

cmaenginsb
Premium,MVM
join:2001-03-19
Palmdale, CA

reply to TKJunkMail
Sprint has always been interested in using a wireless infrastructure for the last mile to replace the need for copper loops controlled by the telcos. Their previous wireless launches reflect this as does their Wimax strategy.

As to take rate, which is better 1% of a 10,000,000 customer market in a 30 mile radius or 100% of a 10,000 customer market in a 30 mile radius?

Keep in mind that WiMax will initially require truck rolls and service calls, it's alot easier to start to deploy where you already have this infrastrure than a new area.


N3OGH
Bear patrol must be working like a charm
Premium
join:2003-11-11
Philly burbs
reply to Karl Bode
OUCH!


RR Conductor
RailRoadDude
Premium
join:2002-04-02
Redwood Valley, CA
·Comcast


1 edit
reply to cpayne5
Most rural areas out here don't even have Sprint, let alone EVDO, we don't have service from Sprint up here, and we're still waiting on 3G from the local carriers (Verizon, US Cellular and Edge Wireless (Cingular Affiliate).

I don't think wireless does good in areas like this either, Mendocino County (NW CA) is very mountainous, and heavily forested (and some of those are Redwoods, which can reach 300 feet or more!), we can't see the local wireless outfit's site due to hills. Thankfully, Comcast (formerly Adelphia) has HSI out here, and we have it.
Forums » Sprint Unveils WiMax Launch City Lineup« Nothing in the Southeast, California, or NYC? Huh?  


Tuesday, 01-Dec 04:36:31 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [60] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [47] Broadband Killed The Game Console
· [35] Rural Carriers Quickly Embracing Fiber
· [31] AT&T Top Lobbyist Cicconi Has His Feelings Hurt
· [25] Charter Exits Chapter 11
· [22] Midcontinent Socked With Easement Lawsuit
· [4] Monday Evening Links
· [3] Monday Morning Links
Most people now reading
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Is Microsoft Technet ok to use for my family PC's? [Microsoft Help]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Considering Leaving Vonage, who should I Consider? [VOIP Tech Chat]
· [Snow Leopard] NFS Mounts - no more Directory Utility [All Things Macintosh]
· Fun screwing with PuG raids. [World of Warcraft]
· [Newsgroups] Newzleech down? [Filesharing Software]
· persistent connection to qw-in-f113.1e100.net on boot [Security]
· Prevx says MS Nov 10 patches causing BSOD problems [Security]