joako
Premium
join:2000-09-07
/dev/null
 ·AT&T U-Verse
| reply to tc1uscg
Re: Glad I bought
said by tc1uscg  :So, which is better, DVI or component? HDMI or component? DVI vs HDMI vs Component.
First lets remove DVI, because HDMI is exactly the same signal specification as DVI + SPDIF Audio in one nice fancy cable.
Now we have HDMI vs Component. Let's see.
Component is analog
Component cant transmit 5.1 Audio
Component cant do 1080i
Just because your Verizon FIOS is slow doesnt mean that fiber optics aren't better than analog DSL lines. Just because you have a device with bad A-D circuit doesnt mean the entire DVI specification is crap.
--
Am Heimcomputer sitz' ich hier, und programmier' die Zukunft mir |
|
bogey780
join:2004-03-19
Here
| Component can do 1080i. In fact it's how many Xbox owners have their hooked up.
Component can't handle ICT which is a big problem if ever content makers decide to enable it.
HDMI is better if only that new receivers allow for simple switching which makes it so much easier to connect devices. Optical SPDIF can't handle uncompressed 5.1 LPCM which is a negative for audiophiles while HDMI 1.3 can.
Right now it all depends on what equipment you have. Eventually it'll be HDMI as everything is moving to support it. |
|
Skippy25
join:2000-09-13
Hazelwood, MO
1 edit | reply to joako
You are incorrect. HDMI does 12bit DVI does only 10bit.
And component can and does do 1080i and it can do 1080p if the device allows it, which most don't. |
|
cdru
Go Colts
Premium,MVM
join:2003-05-14
Fort Wayne, IN
| reply to bogey780
said by bogey780 :HDMI is better if only that new receivers allow for simple switching which makes it so much easier to connect devices. The problem currently is that most receivers are just simple switches for HDMI. If you want a receiver that can actually extract the audio instead of having to get it via a separate feed, you are usually going to pay 2-3x the cost (presuming typical residential-grade equipment...higher end systems excluded).
If they could design an affordable receiver that would upconvert any input source into HDMI so that I have ONE input to send to my TV, I would be in heaven. As it stands now you have a HDMI for the DVD player, component for the gaming system, s-video for the satellite, composite for the VCR, coax for the OTA HD, etc. Too many connections.
Optical SPDIF can't handle uncompressed 5.1 LPCM which is a negative for audiophiles while HDMI 1.3 can. Not that I don't beleive you, but do you have a source for this? I can think of a technical reason why optical couldn't support it, other then content providers wanting to try to lock down and cripple the technology (e.g. HDCP)
--
Go Colts |
|
bogey780
join:2004-03-19
Here
| Try the Onkyo TX-SR804. Cost around 650$ and does all that. I just plugged mine in yesterday and it works fine for going from component to HDMI and pulling the audio from the HDMI link.
The optical SPDIF issue is just one of standards. They support Dolby and DTS just fine but it can only send the signal compressed to the receiver for decoding. HDMI 1.3 allows for 7.1 uncompresed PCM.
I don't have a link to confirm this but I've been told this by many audiophiles as to why I can't get 5.1 PCM across my toslink. |
|
cdru
Go Colts
Premium,MVM
join:2003-05-14
Fort Wayne, IN
| said by bogey780 :The optical SPDIF issue is just one of standards. They support Dolby and DTS just fine but it can only send the signal compressed to the receiver for decoding. HDMI 1.3 allows for 7.1 uncompresed PCM. I don't have a link to confirm this but I've been told this by many audiophiles as to why I can't get 5.1 PCM across my toslink. I wonder if it's kind of like trying to get a 10mbit NIC to work at gigabit speeds. It's not that the fiber itself can't handle it, rather the receiver (or transmitter) is using a outdated technology that doesn't work fast enough.
Interesting none the less. Did not know that if that is indeed the case.
--
Go Colts |
|
tc1uscg
join:2005-03-09
Saint Clair Shores, MI
| reply to joako
said by joako :said by tc1uscg :So, which is better, DVI or component? HDMI or component? DVI vs HDMI vs Component. First lets remove DVI, because HDMI is exactly the same signal specification as DVI + SPDIF Audio in one nice fancy cable. Now we have HDMI vs Component. Let's see. Component is analog Component cant transmit 5.1 Audio Component cant do 1080i Just because your Verizon FIOS is slow doesnt mean that fiber optics aren't better than analog DSL lines. Just because you have a device with bad A-D circuit doesnt mean the entire DVI specification is crap. nor does it make it any better. That's the point. Too many ands, if's or but's to run out and scrap all that hardware purchased over the past 2 years just because some POS gaming system is going to include it. The 360 w/Component provides just a good picture at 720P, 1080i/p as it would if it was pumping the sig over a hdmi cable. Sound? That's what the fiber cable hook up is on the back of the component cable is for. I don't any issue blasting the family room with surround sound while playing games.  |
|
