dynodbPremium,VIP
join:2004-04-21
Minneapolis, MN | reply to RayW
Re: IF... said by RayW:said by wstwrdho:I agree, with service to the whole state as the time defined goal. But that defeats the purpose of the bill which is getting away from the local communities requiring full build outs instead of just the areas with rich majority folks. Oh really?
»coolice.legis.state.ia.us/Cool-I···ll=SF554
2. A competitive cable service provider or competitive video service provider holding a certificate of franchise authority shall not deny access to any group of potential residential subscribers because of the income of residents in the local area in which such group resides. |
|
| Yea, really. One more time. Read my lips. Make it work for a state.
Got any more dumb quotes, troll??? |
|
RayWPremium
join:2001-09-01
Layton, UT
kudos:1
1 edit | Oh well, money talks, and money walks, over the folks who are trying to make a living and pay taxes. |
|
|
|
dynodbPremium,VIP
join:2004-04-21
Minneapolis, MN | reply to wstwrdho
I quoted the bill that is the subject of this thread and story; the quoted portion directly contradicts a post in this thread.
You seem to have a pretty expansive definition of the word "troll"  |
|
4 edits | Enough. These dsl employee/cable employee fights in the news comments are obnoxious.
As are employees shilling for their employers, then attacking critics.
I'm going to be cracking down harder on both from here on. |
|
