Fatal Vector
join:2005-11-26 | reply to Count Zero
Re: A good start
Of course, you COULD just use cool edit or some such, play the song back and record it to the hard drive as a WAV. So long DRM, Hello all platforms. |
|
RadioDoc
58ef2c0
Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11 | I just use a virtual CD drive. "Burn" it to the CD, convert to MP3, delete CD file, rinse and repeat. Never even touches analog.
--
Toolmaster of La Grange. |
|
Count Zero
MD2Be
Premium
join:2007-01-18
Warner Robins, GA | Still loses quality because the "virtual" CD -> MP3 step.
--
»web.mac.com/jwsmiths/ |
|
RadioDoc
58ef2c0
Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11 | Nope. |
|
Count Zero
MD2Be
Premium
join:2007-01-18
Warner Robins, GA
 ·AT&T DSL Service
 ·Cox HSI
| How does it not? When you convert from AAC -> PCM on CD you don't lose any quality, but when you re-encode that PCM from the CD into an MP3 it DOES lose quality.
--
»web.mac.com/jwsmiths/ |
|
RadioDoc
58ef2c0
Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11
·AT&T Midwest
| Depends on what you are using, and at what bitrate. AAC already does serious damage to the audio quality of the source material so it becomes a matter of degree. There is nothing stopping me from using any format I want. That's kind of the point of the exercise, right? I can even leave it as raw PCM.
Most people are so used to listening to crappy audio via iPods, etc., that they probably can't tell the difference anyway. Look at all the satellite radio fans who think it sounds great.
--
Toolmaster of La Grange. |
|
Count Zero
MD2Be
Premium
join:2007-01-18
Warner Robins, GA
·AT&T DSL Service
·Cox HSI
| Oh I agree - XM sounds like shit to me, about the only thing I can stand to listen to on it is the comedy channels and news (and even those aren't worth paying for IMHO). I can tell it doesn't have nearly the depth of even a 256kbps AAC I rip from a CD with iTunes.
And yes it is a matter of degrees. Seeing as how the original format was 128 or 256kbps AAC it isn't as clean as the original source, then translating it into MP3 results in another loss of quality. Of course if you use a higher bitrate MP3 it is a lower degree of loss if you aren't using great speakers or listening in a quiet environment (or just aren't a snob about sound quality) it all amounts to a hill of beans anyways.
--
»web.mac.com/jwsmiths/ |
|
RadioDoc
58ef2c0
Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11
·AT&T Midwest
| Yep. Most listeners under about 30 wouldn't know decent sounding audio these days, which is why iPods, with their puny earbuds, sell like hotcakes, right along with flimsy plastic-case speakers and "home theater" systems which anyone who truly knows audio would laugh at.
But this about ditching DRM without the blessing of anyone, and it works just fine the way I described. The higher bitrate is just the come-on for the no-DRM pitch.
--
Toolmaster of La Grange. |
|
Michieru2
zzz zzz zzz
Premium
join:2005-01-28
Miami, FL
| reply to RadioDoc
The iPod is just a MP3 player, depending on the quality of the content is the amount of quality you will get, same applies to any other player unless for some reason its audio out is simply shit.
I think it more applies to cellphones with compressed 3gp videos and they play them extremely loud watching a few blocks of pixels saying "that's my friend!" "There is tina HEY!".
Also the source files quality is what matters, if you burn it on to a virtual CD aka ISO it will simply convert the audio to a uncompressed format/AIFF from there you simply transfer that over and either choose to convert from the original source which in most cases would make perfect sense if the original source was never encoded and is simply a raw and will make no sense if we are talking about a compressed source.
--
The only limits we have are the one's we set ourselves. |
|
thender2
Glamour Profession
Premium
join:2004-05-16
Staten Island, NY
| reply to RadioDoc
said by RadioDoc  :Depends on what you are using, and at what bitrate. AAC already does serious damage to the audio quality of the source material so it becomes a matter of degree. There is nothing stopping me from using any format I want. That's kind of the point of the exercise, right? I can even leave it as raw PCM. Most people are so used to listening to crappy audio via iPods, etc., that they probably can't tell the difference anyway. Look at all the satellite radio fans who think it sounds great. Just because people are used to bad quality doesn't mean transcoding doesn't further hurt quality. It does.
I fully agree that joe-deaf who goes on the 97 dB subway and pumps his music to 105 dB to hear it isn't going to care, but that doesn't mean it doesn't mutilate quality. 
--
The Problem With Music.
Our Rationale
Time to rewrite the DMCA. |
|
RadioDoc
58ef2c0
Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11
·AT&T Midwest
| Oh I certainly agree about the quality issue. Problem is that by the time it's put on iTunes, et. al. it's been compressed and corrupted beyond anything that could be considered "hi fi". Pulling it out to raw PCM basically gives you what's left of the corpse.
--
Toolmaster of La Grange. |
|
guitarzan
Premium
join:2004-05-04
Skytop, PA
·epix
| reply to RadioDoc
said by RadioDoc :Depends on what you are using, and at what bitrate. AAC already does serious damage to the audio quality of the source material so it becomes a matter of degree. There is nothing stopping me from using any format I want. That's kind of the point of the exercise, right? I can even leave it as raw PCM. Most people are so used to listening to crappy audio via iPods, etc., that they probably can't tell the difference anyway. Look at all the satellite radio fans who think it sounds great. »www.poikosoft.com/
rip at VBR 0 (highest level) works like a charm.
--
Its the Democrats fault. In fact it is the Speaker of House Polosi fault. Everything is the Democrats fault. Everything. Just like Everything was the Republicans Fault when they were in power. |
|
