 MxxCon
join:1999-11-19
Brooklyn, NY | is it really good on 2 patents? "Vonage has signed an agreement with a VoIP network services provider to carry calls placed by Vonage customers" so wouldn't verizon now go after that other voip provider?
--
[Sig removed by Administrator: Signature can not exceed 20GB] |
|
| said by MxxCon:"Vonage has signed an agreement with a VoIP network services provider to carry calls placed by Vonage customers" so wouldn't verizon now go after that other voip provider? Not if they are not violating patents...
--
"Independent thinkers tend to ALWAYS have someone not agreeing with them. It's The non-thinkers that always come in legions." John Callari .:|:. Say no to the IRS Yes to the Fair Tax |
|
 LokerPremium
join:2004-07-11
Fargo, ND | said by aztecnology:said by MxxCon:"Vonage has signed an agreement with a VoIP network services provider to carry calls placed by Vonage customers" so wouldn't verizon now go after that other voip provider? Not if they are not violating patents... LOL like that matters...
--
"While preceding your entrance with a grenade is a good tactic inQuake, it can lead to problems if attempted at work." -- C Hacking |
|
|
|
 sporkmedrop the crantini and move it, sisterPremium,MVM
join:2000-07-01
Morristown, NJ
 ·Optimum Online
| reply to aztecnology
said by aztecnology:said by MxxCon:"Vonage has signed an agreement with a VoIP network services provider to carry calls placed by Vonage customers" so wouldn't verizon now go after that other voip provider? Not if they are not violating patents... Everyone doing voip is violating these patents. The case with verizon did not address whether or not the patents were valid,
Now verizon needs to sue someone bigger so that the whole mess can be overturned. |
|
