<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: is it really good on 2 patents? in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r18110306</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 09:28:06 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 09:28:06 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: is it really good on 2 patents?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18110306</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/168864"><b>sporkme</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  aztecnology <A HREF="/useremail/u/769628"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR><div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  MxxCon <A HREF="/useremail/u/118623"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br><BLOCKQUOTE>"Vonage has signed an agreement with a VoIP network services provider to carry calls placed by Vonage customers"</BLOCKQUOTE>so wouldn't verizon now go after that other voip provider?<br> </DIV>Not if they are not violating patents...<br> </DIV>Everyone doing voip is violating these patents.  The case with verizon did not address whether or not the patents were valid,<br><br>Now verizon needs to sue someone bigger so that the whole mess can be overturned.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18110306</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 12:43:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: is it really good on 2 patents?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18109737</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1039092"><b>Loker</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  aztecnology <A HREF="/useremail/u/769628"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br><div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  MxxCon <A HREF="/useremail/u/118623"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br><BLOCKQUOTE>"Vonage has signed an agreement with a VoIP network services provider to carry calls placed by Vonage customers"</BLOCKQUOTE>so wouldn't verizon now go after that other voip provider?<br> </DIV>Not if they are not violating patents...<br> </DIV>LOL like that matters...<br><SMALL>--<br>"While preceding your entrance with a grenade is a good tactic inQuake, it can lead to problems if attempted at work." -- C Hacking</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18109737</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 10:54:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: is it really good on 2 patents?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18109375</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/769628"><b>aztecnology</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  MxxCon <A HREF="/useremail/u/118623"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br><BLOCKQUOTE>"Vonage has signed an agreement with a VoIP network services provider to carry calls placed by Vonage customers"</BLOCKQUOTE>so wouldn't verizon now go after that other voip provider?<br> </DIV>Not if they are not violating patents...<br><SMALL>--<br>"Independent thinkers tend to ALWAYS have someone not agreeing with them. It's The non-thinkers that always come in legions." John Callari .:|:. Say no to the IRS <A HREF="http://www.fairtaxvolunteer.org/smart/faq-main.html#1">Yes to the Fair Tax</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18109375</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 09:38:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>is it really good on 2 patents?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18109343</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/118623"><b>MxxCon</b></A> : <BLOCKQUOTE>"Vonage has signed an agreement with a VoIP network services provider to carry calls placed by Vonage customers"</BLOCKQUOTE>so wouldn't verizon now go after that other voip provider?<br><SMALL>--<br>[Sig removed by Administrator: Signature can not exceed 20GB]</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18109343</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 09:29:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
