Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Towns Fight AT&T Over Eminent Domain » Why can't they bury them?
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
494
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« NIMBY  
page: 1 · 2
AuthorAll Replies


ArgMeMatey

join:2001-08-09
Milwaukee, WI
·AT&T Midwest

reply to dynodb
Re: Why can they bury them?

said by dynodb See Profile :

RT's need to be accessed on a pretty regular basis- exactly how would you accomplish this with it buried underground?
...
In order to do this, you'd need a very large hole... and then there'd be complaints about the 10 x 10 x 10 foot hole being dug in someone's yard.
Like he said, cost. Many people would give them a long term lease on a 10'x10' patch with an access hatch and landscaping, for a price! Not easy, not convenient, but if it didn't cost so much why wouldn't they avoid the aggravation?

Electric utilities can put entire substations underground if so ordered, but they usually can charge ratepayers instead of having to worry about being profitable.

AT&T also could have run fiber direct to homes, but they decided to try this instead because it's cheaper.

When people say "It's just not practical" they often mean "That would cost too much."
--
USNG:16TDN2870 Find your Lat-Long: Geocoder


rec9140
Provoice just DO it

join:2003-07-29
Mulberry, FL

said by ArgMeMatey See Profile :
In order to do this, you'd need a very large hole... and then there'd be complaints about the 10 x 10 x 10 foot hole being dug in someone's yard.
Like he said, cost. Many people would give them a long term lease on a 10'x10' patch with an access hatch and landscaping, for a price! Not easy, not convenient, but if it didn't cost so much why wouldn't they avoid the aggravation?
ATTENTION VZ:

I will give you all the space you want to put in any kind of equipment in my yard you want.

No lease, no strings, just BRING THE FIOS ON!

So long as I get Fios DATA I don't care. Less I have to mow.

Oh... no need to worry there won't be any landscaping around it either unless VZ is doing it an plans on keeping it up. Droughts smoughts.... grass dies, it will grow a again.

Need space for a self supproting tower...NO PROBLEM. Now there will be some strings attached to that one. I need 5-6 spaces at about 50-60 ft. for some antennas and we have a deal.

Just cut the whiners off!


Clemcon

@ameritech.net
reply to dynodb
ATT in Michigan has several first generation RTs that are underground with very good access from ground level. 2nd generation units are all above ground in brick buildings/huts while the newest units are housed in above ground cabinets.

rradina

join:2000-08-08
Chesterfield, MO

reply to Ahrenl
Re: Why can't they bury them?

That was my thought. I was thinking not hydraulic but work-gear jack. The maintenance worker could connect a truck-powered portable electric motor to the jack socket. Hook it up, flip the switch and watch it rise out of the ground.

Ventilation and drainage might be a challenge but I'd rather have a ground-level grate in my front yard than a puke green monolith.

degauss1

join:2001-07-02
Hillsboro, OR
·ViaTalk
·Verizon FIOS
·Comcast
·Axvoice

reply to ArgMeMatey
Re: Why can they bury them?

You hit it right on the head. They had a choice of what technology the deployed. If they had chosen FTTP it would have cost more money - but they would not have had to use these big RT cabinets. The VDSL was cheaper to deploy but requires these huge cabinets.

All that and they are going to have to eventually move to fiber anyway. What a huge waste of money and time not to mention the aggravation to the public.

Kearnstd
Elf Wizard
Premium
join:2002-01-22
Mullica Hill, NJ
reply to RideRed
Re: Why can't they bury them?

downside to FiOS is that it isnt stock holder friendly, probally why ATT is going the VRAD route as it is more stockholder friendly.
--
[65 Arcanist]Filan(High Elf) Zone: Broadband Reports

kt1g

join:2006-07-30
East Hartford, CT
reply to RideRed
Take VZ's example and do FTTH.
and give us the same package/price
Forums » Towns Fight AT&T Over Eminent Domain« NIMBY  
page: 1 · 2


Friday, 04-Dec 23:29:22 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [163] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [145] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [126] Comcast Makes NBC Universal Acquisition Official
· [104] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [101] Google Invades ISP, OpenDNS Turf With Google Public DNS
· [83] FCC Ponders Moving From PSTN To IP Voice
· [81] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [74] Sprint Defuses GPS Privacy Media Bomb
· [74] The Bandwidth Hog Does Not Exist
· [70] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Google takes aim at browser redirection [Security]
· IMG 1.7 (IMG Updates and Discussion) [Verizon FIOS TV]
· Using AirMax to provide triple play services? [Wireless Service Providers]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Why do you switch distros? [All Things Unix]
· IPComms Free DIDs now with sip registration maybe?? [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Farewell [Bell Canada]