<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Private networks&#x27; in forum &#x27;IPv6&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Private-networks-18115600</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:23:09 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:23:09 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Private networks</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Private-networks-18117587</link>
<description><![CDATA[visitor posted : Yah sort of...  They have something they call link-local addressing which routers are not suppose to pass.  The addresses start with fe80.  Do a google for IPv6 Link-Local addressing and you get plenty to read.<br><SMALL>--<br>One minute... and Clarkson still sux!</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Private-networks-18117587</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 18:44:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Private networks</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Private-networks-18115600</link>
<description><![CDATA[klam posted : Under IPV4 there are reserved/non-routable address ranges eg 192.168.n.n, Is there such a thing in IPV6. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Private-networks-18115600</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 12:38:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

