dynodbPremium,VIP
join:2004-04-21
Minneapolis, MN | Only on BBR... Only on BBR would commenters suggest that a $400 million dollar upgrade to digital and an expanded HD lineup be somehow considered a bad thing, even when they're not charging extra for it.
Given that most people already rent a cable box, the suggestion that this is done to get a few dollars a month from those relative few who don't is beyond stupid. |
|
| said by dynodb:Only on BBR would commenters suggest that a $400 million dollar upgrade to digital and an expanded HD lineup be somehow considered a bad thing, even when they're not charging extra for it. Given that most people already rent a cable box, the suggestion that this is done to get a few dollars a month from those relative few who don't is beyond stupid. Well said.
--
"Don't steal. The government hates competition." |
|
 CabalPremium
join:2007-01-21
Austin, TX | reply to dynodb
I don't rent a cable box. Neither does anyone I know. |
|
| reply to dynodb
Because people lose out on analog service and have to rent a cable box. It's not favorable to a lot of people. |
|
 reub2000Premium
join:2001-12-28
Evanston, IL | reply to dynodb
said by dynodb:Only on BBR would commenters suggest that a $400 million dollar upgrade to digital and an expanded HD lineup be somehow considered a bad thing, even when they're not charging extra for it. Given that most people already rent a cable box, the suggestion that this is done to get a few dollars a month from those relative few who don't is beyond stupid. Why would I want an ad ridden box when analog cable works fine as it is. In my mind digital cable is defective by design.
--
My pbase gallery |
|
