  jmorlan Hmm... That's funny. Premium join:2001-02-05 Pacifica, CA
·Pacific Bell - SBC
| reply to Lanik Re: [FireFox] Tweaking Firefox for Fun & Speed
Thanks.
I made the mistake of uninstalling FasterFox, thinking it would automatically change setting back to default. It doesn't work that way. You have to manually change setting back to default in FasterFox before uninstalling, otherwise you keep your settings.
Anyway, that bad FasterFox setting is correct in my config. |
|
  Lanik Lab-nik Premium,ExMod 2002-03 join:2001-06-25 Bay Area
| said by jmorlan :You have to manually change setting back to default in FasterFox before uninstalling, otherwise you keep your settings. Good point.
I played around with that setting and you can set the profile to custom and change fastback to 5 but as soon as you save the changes it reverts back, worse yet unless you patch FasterFox it will use the incorrect value. -- "If it ain't broke don't fix it." Computer Consulting for the Next Generation. |
|
  Jesse2
join:2006-07-22 canada | Wooow thanks for this. I noticed a huge boost in speed! |
|
  Grail Knight Who Dares Wins Premium join:2003-05-31 | Firefox is made for tweaking. |
|
  Grail Knight Who Dares Wins Premium join:2003-05-31 | reply to Lanik Manually tweaking Fx is the way to go. |
|
 hfam95
join:2003-06-20 Woodbridge, VA | reply to Grail Knight Actually you can tweak how firefox behaves too.(hidden menus, icon location, icon design, etc.) |
|
  Grail Knight Who Dares Wins Premium join:2003-05-31
·Verizon Online DSL
1 edit | That is true and we had a small thread on that last here Winter but it pales in comparison to the 53 page thread on those types of tweaks at MozillaZine.
Edit* Here is the link for that thread if you are interested. |
|
  Babar Premium join:2001-05-09 Washington | reply to Grail Knight Thank you, GK!  |
|
  Grail Knight Who Dares Wins Premium join:2003-05-31 | Your welcome Babar. |
|
  Weirdal Premium join:2003-06-28 Lincoln, NE | reply to Grail Knight Aren't some of these effectively performing a ddos attack on every site you visit? |
|
  Grail Knight Who Dares Wins Premium join:2003-05-31
·Verizon Online DSL
1 edit | I believe anything over 225 connections would be loosely construed as a ddos. I only read that on one site.
Anything over 225 would be denied by the server and possibly slow the connection down.
The tweaks are not even close and taken from Mozilla Guide to tweaking Fx and within the parameters of what Firefox is capable of.
Did you look at the link I posted to the Firefox Tweak Site?
Edit*
More on ddos here.
»en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denial-of-···e_attack |
|
  Weirdal Premium join:2003-06-28 Lincoln, NE
| said by Grail Knight :I believe anything over 225 connections would be loosely construed as a ddos. I only read that on one site. Anything over 225 would be denied by the server and possibly slow the connection down. The tweaks are not even close and taken from Mozilla Guide to tweaking Fx and within the parameters of what Firefox is capable of. Did you look at the link I posted to the Firefox Tweak Site? Edit* More on ddos here. » en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denial-of-···e_attack Oh, I didn't know anything under 225 connections is considered ok. I just figured that more connections = more server load = slower site for the rest of us. -- Journal | SBKRadio
|
|
  Grail Knight Who Dares Wins Premium join:2003-05-31 | I would imagine if thousands of us visited the same site simultaneously we would create a ruckus. |
|
 PentiumIII
join:2002-06-28 | reply to Grail Knight Thanks for the tweak, I have adjusted it a bit to suit my pc a bit better, it seems a bit more responsive to me with the following changes.
user_pref("network.http.request.max-start-delay", 0; user_pref("nglayout.initialpaint.delay", 0); |
|
  Grail Knight Who Dares Wins Premium join:2003-05-31 | Your welcome.
Tweaks are made to be further tweaked. |
|
  Psicop More human than human Premium join:2005-12-21 | reply to Grail Knight
user_pref("network.http.pipelining.maxrequests", 8); I read in several places this tweak:
network.http.pipelining.maxrequests = 30
What do you think? |
|
  Grail Knight Who Dares Wins Premium join:2003-05-31
·Verizon Online DSL
| Setting it higher then 8 based will do nothing.
»kb.mozillazine.org/Network.http.···requests
This is from the original Fx Tuning Site:
»forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?t=53650
network.http.pipelining.maxrequests
* Description: maximum number of consecutive requests in one pipeline. * Type: integer * Limit: 8 * Default: 4 * Additional Info: nsHTTP.h. Optimal value depends on connection bandwidth/latency. * Recommendation: 8. While it doesn't hurt to set it to 100 like in other tweak examples, it will have no effect whatsoever because of the mentioned limit. -- My browser and email client of choice are Firefox & Thunderbird.
DRM is here to stay thankfully.
|
|
  MysticGogeta The Robot Devil Premium join:2005-03-14 League City, TX clubs: 1 edit | reply to Grail Knight Woha! Defiantly faster thanks a bunch! |
|
  Grail Knight Who Dares Wins Premium join:2003-05-31 | Good deal.
Your welcome. |
|
  GhostReaper Welcome to Hell Premium join:2007-04-18 Englewood, CO
| reply to Grail Knight Pretty cool tweak in that codes perameters man kudos to you... I was workin on a very similiar tweak and had a few characters off on the code and gettin errors still I saw this post and went well duh.. Anyways goodjob and thanks again.. I am fairly new to this site and have a very extensive knowledge myself in almost all fields of computer technology... I sit here and read about problems ppl have and add in a few cents worth of my wisdom.. If thats what its called nowadays....
All in All I am goin to be a member of this community for life now... |
|