<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: Added cost for better quality?&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Added-cost-for-better-quality-18137177</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 04:51:20 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 04:51:20 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Added cost for better quality?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Added-cost-for-better-quality-18140758</link>
<description><![CDATA[BuriedCaesar posted : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by <a href="/profile/1024779" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1024779');">DarkSorcerer</a>:</SMALL><br><br>Don't forget Kaspersky AV Probly one of the best AVs out there is russian, Yes, those damn commies are at it again!<br> </DIV>And this is the "best" Kaspersky can do?<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://news.com.com/2061-10789_3-6173682.html" >news.com.com/2061-10789_3-6173682.html</A><br><br>Right...<br><SMALL>--<br>That was preposterous! Utter Nonsense! Totally unsupportable drivel! You can't be serious!....Um, what did you say?</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Added-cost-for-better-quality-18140758</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 10:04:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Added cost for better quality?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Added-cost-for-better-quality-18140305</link>
<description><![CDATA[DarkSorcerer posted : Your ignorance is awesome, Don't forget Kaspersky AV Probly one of the best AVs out there is russian, Yes, those damn commies are at it again!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Added-cost-for-better-quality-18140305</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 07:45:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Added cost for better quality?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Added-cost-for-better-quality-18140274</link>
<description><![CDATA[markopoleo posted : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by <a href="/profile/1048555" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1048555');">BF69</a>:</SMALL><BR><BR><div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by <a href="/profile/794284" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=794284');">markopoleo</a>:</SMALL><BR><BR>allofmp3.com you can.<br> </DIV>Sorry rather deal with LEGAL and REPUTABLE non Russian companies. Anyone that would type in their CC info on a russian website is an idiot.<br> </DIV>I would say that you are an idiot for that statement.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Added-cost-for-better-quality-18140274</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 07:27:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Added cost for better quality?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Added-cost-for-better-quality-18139467</link>
<description><![CDATA[djdanska posted : Been using them for years here too. Never had any type of bad experience with them. I use a prepaid netspend card to buy music. Can't take what isn't there!<br><SMALL>--<br>When you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all.<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://djdanska.com" >djdanska.com</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Added-cost-for-better-quality-18139467</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 23:52:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Added cost for better quality?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Added-cost-for-better-quality-18138646</link>
<description><![CDATA[pb5k posted : The legality is certainly questionable but as I've noted before, the payments (via visa/mastercard) to allofmp3 <I>were</I> formerly processed by ChronoPay, a genuine and well established Dutch company.  They have ceased their agreement with allofmp3, likely because of legal harrassment from media companies, but not because of fraud.<br><br>As for the reputability, allofmp3 has been used for several years by many users.  I've not once heard of a fraudulent credit card charge stemming from them (correct me if I am wrong).<br><SMALL>--<br>"When they call the roll in the Senate, the Senators do not know whether to answer 'Present' or 'Not guilty.'" --<br>Theodore Roosevelt</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Added-cost-for-better-quality-18138646</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 20:54:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Added cost for better quality?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Added-cost-for-better-quality-18138376</link>
<description><![CDATA[BF69 posted : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by <a href="/profile/794284" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=794284');">markopoleo</a>:</SMALL><BR><BR>allofmp3.com you can.<br> </DIV>Sorry rather deal with LEGAL and REPUTABLE non Russian companies. Anyone that would type in their CC info on a russian website is an idiot.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Added-cost-for-better-quality-18138376</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 20:13:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Added cost for better quality?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Added-cost-for-better-quality-18138364</link>
<description><![CDATA[BF69 posted : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by <a href="/profile/1008293" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1008293');">thender2</a>:</SMALL><BR><BR>This should be good. I can't wait to see the result - pay more than the CD for 192k instead of 128k? I'm not optimistic. <br> </DIV>If it's the same deal with Apple the CD price is exactly the same. Only if you buy individual songs is there an increase in price.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Added-cost-for-better-quality-18138364</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 20:12:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Added cost for better quality?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Added-cost-for-better-quality-18138131</link>
<description><![CDATA[markopoleo posted : allofmp3.com you can.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Added-cost-for-better-quality-18138131</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 19:32:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Added cost for better quality?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Added-cost-for-better-quality-18137434</link>
<description><![CDATA[Speedy8 posted : Yeah, most of the bands I listen to have enough good songs per CD to make the whole thing worth getting. I'll never buy digital music online until I can get a whole album for $10 in lossless format and no DRM, which will probably never happen.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Added-cost-for-better-quality-18137434</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 16:29:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Added cost for better quality?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Added-cost-for-better-quality-18137285</link>
<description><![CDATA[WareWolF2k posted : Most people who buy from these services generally only buy the songs they like, not whole CD's.  Usually only 1 or 2 songs max per cd for current pop artists.  Collectors generally buy real CD's or get HQ rips from newsgroups.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Added-cost-for-better-quality-18137285</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 15:45:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Added cost for better quality?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Added-cost-for-better-quality-18137177</link>
<description><![CDATA[thender2 posted : This should be good. I can't wait to see the result - pay more than the CD for 192k instead of 128k? I'm not optimistic. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Added-cost-for-better-quality-18137177</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 15:14:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

