<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>This was never the intended use. in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r18149493</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 17:28:12 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 17:28:12 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: This was never the intended use.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18150105</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/611909"><b>patcat88</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  mrbueno <A HREF="/useremail/u/668130"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>It's that simple.  <br><br>WiFi outdoors can work, but you have to know what you are doing and you have to have some clue to do an install.  Most of these installs try to ignore the fact that 2.4Ghz doesn't like wood, water, concrete, or metal.  2.4Ghz wants it's space.<br><br>Those of you wanting a working WiFi experience in one of these cities should buy an outdoor unit and get it above the trees.  That will help alot.  Then all you have to worry about is the interference created by hundreds of APs seeing each other on the same channel, the fact that 802.11b/g isn't meant for outdoor use, and the nearest AP having too many associations. <br> </DIV>There is nothing like being in a NYC park in a hip upscale urban area in Manhatten with very tall buildings on all sides. And when I try to get the park's wifi, I get over 400 SSID. Plenty of open APs. :D<br><br>You need to attenuate or use a directional antenna to have ANY hope of loging onto a AP. Wifi was designed so its signal dies by the time it gets just outside your house, so your neighbors can reuse the channels. Its not a cellular protocol. Its very difficult and expensive to make a good throughput cellular/mesh wifi network. You need low enough transmit power so APs dont hear each other, but then shitty wifi laptops/clients cant hear, so you need more APs. Plus frequency reuse is hard when you only have 3 channels effectivly.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18150105</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 20:46:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: This was never the intended use.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18149844</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/161103"><b>SandShark</b></A> : We don't have city-wide wi-fi, but there are a few free hot spots provided by the local visitor and convention bureau.  It's always there, but I don't find myself taking advantage of it that much.  <br><br>Here I am in the white van on a slow work day. :-)<br><br>[att=1]   <div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/18149844?c=1150323&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IxODE0OTQ5My54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="184224 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=420 SRC="/r0/download/1150323.thumb600~89a39693ce9397077e117b956666a0f4/Me on Seawall 3 JPEG.jpg/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A><br>Smile.  I'm on Candid Camera!</TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18149844</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 19:54:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>This was never the intended use.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18149493</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/668130"><b>mrbueno</b></A> : It's that simple.  <br><br>WiFi outdoors can work, but you have to know what you are doing and you have to have some clue to do an install.  Most of these installs try to ignore the fact that 2.4Ghz doesn't like wood, water, concrete, or metal.  2.4Ghz wants it's space.<br><br>Those of you wanting a working WiFi experience in one of these cities should buy an outdoor unit and get it above the trees.  That will help alot.  Then all you have to worry about is the interference created by hundreds of APs seeing each other on the same channel, the fact that 802.11b/g isn't meant for outdoor use, and the nearest AP having too many associations. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18149493</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 18:49:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
