Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Cities Realize Wi-Fi Isn't Magic Pixie Dust » who designs these networks?
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
186
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
LOL »
« Taipei  
AuthorAll Replies


rawgerz
In Debt we trust
Premium
join:2004-10-03
Grove City, PA
·Verizon Online DSL
·Sprint Mobile Broa..

who designs these networks?

If these networks are using low to the ground structures like light poles, it's NO wonder why coverage is so bad!

Theres a reason why they make 300 foot cell towers, and why they're used!

And since any off the shelf hardware can be used, the problems just keep growing.
--

You can't make all the people happy all of the time. But it should be common sense to shoot for the majority.

patcat88

join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY

said by rawgerz See Profile :

If these networks are using low to the ground structures like light poles, it's NO wonder why coverage is so bad!

Theres a reason why they make 300 foot cell towers, and why they're used!

And since any off the shelf hardware can be used, the problems just keep growing.
Raising the height wont work. Then it will be further from the laptops, and the AP wont hear laptops. Plus then the signal will go further and interfere with another AP on the network.

RadioDoc
58ef2c0
Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11
reply to rawgerz
Unless you're in the sticks, you won't see any 300 foot cell towers...
--
Toolmaster of La Grange.


rawgerz
In Debt we trust
Premium
join:2004-10-03
Grove City, PA
·Verizon Online DSL
·Sprint Mobile Broa..

reply to patcat88
with a sector antenna and enough downtilt, sure it's going to be better than omni antennas.

But still, wifi is not well suited, or practical for a network this size.

How anyone in NYC can use wifi is beyond me, with that many APs that you stated above, the interference has to make it completely worthless.
--

You can't make all the people happy all of the time. But it should be common sense to shoot for the majority.

patcat88

join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY

I will say, apt buildings and such, decrease outside signals, and in most apartments, its near-LOS to the AP. Concrete floors decrease signal enough to make some room for a AP in a apt on floor below/above. Also most apts have have heavy thick walls, so that also blocks signal (making it easier for AP to transmit). I would bet on the near-LOS factor.
Forums » Cities Realize Wi-Fi Isn't Magic Pixie DustLOL »
« Taipei  


Sunday, 22-Nov 23:08:51 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [215] Weekend Open Thread
· [117] Verizon Again Hints At Metered Billing
· [97] There's Still No Evidence That Metered Billing Is Necessary
· [94] Will AOL's Implosion Ever End?
· [85] Spain Declares Broadband A Legal Right
· [75] Deploying FTTH Without Digging Things Up
· [74] Verizon To Be Tested By Unofficial Droid Tethering
· [73] Femtocells Are A No Show
· [67] Verizon To AT&T: The Truth Hurts
· [60] Chicago Tribune Visits 'Comcast University'
Most people now reading
· [NFL] Week 11 Games Thread [Sports Chat]
· Best Bluray player [General Questions]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· what cellphone/company to get? [TekSavvy]
· persistent connection to qw-in-f113.1e100.net on boot [Security]
· Smoker's Applecare warranties may not be worth anything [All Things Macintosh]
· Slow speeds in the evenings [TekSavvy]
· Sealing air ducts [Home Repair & Improvement]
· TekSavvy Price Increase? [TekSavvy]