I agree

Author	All Replies
ansar Search for HighSpeed join:2004-12-10 Utica, MS	I agree I would support subsidies and tax incentives for the expansion of broadband to rural america. If the government is going to get involved, I agree it should be in catagorized as a utility and provided to everyone.
	to forum · permalink · 2007-04-17 10:54:02 ·
richardpor Fur it up join:2003-04-19 Portland, OR	Re: I agree--NOT! Or should it be crammed down everybody’s throat even if one has no need or desire to use the service and then get sent the bill compliments of Uncle Sam. When I see mega corporate network getting by with a lot less speed 100Mbps broadband is unnecessary toy!
	to forum · permalink · 2007-04-17 12:33:47 ·

RR Conductor Happy 40th Amtrak Premium join:2002-04-02 Redwood Valley, CA kudos:1 2 edits	It's called promoting the general welfare (Preamble, US Constitution), whether you personally need or use it is irrelevant, some do and will. Think outside yourself I agree it should be a utility, if the US Government had not pumped money into things like the electrical grid in programs like the TVA, I bet a lot of those areas would still be without power. If it helps the country prosper and grow, then let's do it...oh wait, we have that mess in Iraq we'll be fighting for the next century, well..suuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck there goes the money.
	to forum · permalink · 2007-04-17 20:52:27 ·

FTTH Council's '100Mbps Nation' > I agree