Re: Can't you see?

Author	All Replies
manfmmd Premium join:2003-01-14 Earth, TX Reviews: ·AT&T Southwest 1 edit	reply to Karl Bode Re: Can't you see? said by Karl Bode: quote: I don't understand why so many are against protecting children from the negative consequences and addictiveness of pornography, speaking as if though porn has fantastic and positive repercussions on our generation! If you've got children, that's your job. It came with the decision of having sex and creating life. That's part of the problem, with more and more mothers working and not staying home with the kid(s) (with the father working too), there is not the level of supervision that was available 20-50 years ago. The availability of porn is much higher now as well. I think any tool that can be made readily available, should be utilized as we (parents) cannot be there 100% of the time. Public places like Internet Cafe's and Library's should be able to easily filter their traffic... -- huh? \| AIM \| The beauty of ignorance is indescribable.
	to forum · permalink · 2007-04-20 11:57:22 ·

sporkme drop the crantini and move it, sister Premium,MVM join:2000-07-01 Morristown, NJ	said by manfmmd: [That's part of the problem, with more and more mothers working and not staying home with the kid(s) (with the father working too), there is not the level of supervision that was available 20-50 years ago. The availability of porn is much higher now as well. I think any tool that can be made readily available, should be utilized as we (parents) cannot be there 100% of the time. Public places like Internet Cafe's and Library's should be able to easily filter their traffic... If you don't have the time or money for kids, don't have them. It's really that simple. I don't want/need a nanny state because people can't figure out birth control. Tax dollars for people that didn't realize kids need supervision? No thanks.
	to forum · permalink · 2007-04-20 14:48:11 ·
manfmmd Premium join:2003-01-14 Earth, TX Reviews: ·AT&T Southwest	I absolutely agree. Nothing burns my ass more that seeing a family of 10 in Wal-Mart using their "LoneStar Card" (The Texas version of food stamps) to buy Prime Rib, T-Bones, Seafood, etc. The only other thing that burns my ass is.....a flame about 3 feet high. -- huh? \| AIM \| The beauty of ignorance is indescribable.
	to forum · permalink · 2007-04-20 14:57:54 ·
nixen Rockin' the Boxen Premium join:2002-10-04 Alexandria, VA	reply to manfmmd Just because you couldn't control the fire in your loins enough to keep from squeezing out rugrats doesn't mean the rest of us should be held accountable for your absentee parenting. -- Everyday, thousands of new cars are delivered to their new owners with poorly-selected radio station presets.
	to forum · permalink · 2007-04-20 20:16:40 ·
manfmmd Premium join:2003-01-14 Earth, TX Reviews: ·AT&T Southwest	said by nixen: Just because you couldn't control the fire in your loins enough to keep from squeezing out rugrats doesn't mean the rest of us should be held accountable for your absentee parenting. I hope you aren't referring to me... I take care of my kids and monitor their online activity, everything leaving my internet connection is logged and filtered. -- huh? \| AIM \| The beauty of ignorance is indescribable.
	to forum · permalink · 2007-04-20 20:19:20 ·
nixen Rockin' the Boxen Premium join:2002-10-04 Alexandria, VA	said by manfmmd: said by nixen: Just because you couldn't control the fire in your loins enough to keep from squeezing out rugrats doesn't mean the rest of us should be held accountable for your absentee parenting. I hope you aren't referring to me... I take care of my kids and monitor their online activity, everything leaving my internet connection is logged and filtered. Yeah, once I posted that, I thought, "maybe I should have put 'the collective you' in parentheses". /me shrugs -- Everyday, thousands of new cars are delivered to their new owners with poorly-selected radio station presets.
	to forum · permalink · 2007-04-20 20:21:44 ·
patcat88 join:2002-04-05 Jamaica, NY kudos:1	reply to manfmmd Everything is big in Texas.
	to forum · permalink · 2007-04-20 20:31:58 ·
Thaler Premium join:2004-02-02 Los Angeles, CA kudos:2 Reviews: ·DSL EXTREME	reply to manfmmd said by manfmmd: That's part of the problem, with more and more mothers working and not staying home with the kid(s) (with the father working too), there is not the level of supervision that was available 20-50 years ago. So, now it's the government's job to babysit children which parents planned to have without supervision? I mean...I thought being with the child was part of good parent planning, or did I miss something? I can understand state-provided access spots like Librarys using filters, but what's wrong with an internet cafe offering unfiltered broadband? Most consumers there aren't looking for kiddy-blocks.
	to forum · permalink · 2007-04-20 21:02:56 ·
manfmmd Premium join:2003-01-14 Earth, TX Reviews: ·AT&T Southwest	said by Thaler: said by manfmmd: That's part of the problem, with more and more mothers working and not staying home with the kid(s) (with the father working too), there is not the level of supervision that was available 20-50 years ago. So, now it's the government's job to babysit children which parents planned to have without supervision? I mean...I thought being with the child was part of good parent planning, or did I miss something? I can understand state-provided access spots like Librarys using filters, but what's wrong with an internet cafe offering unfiltered broadband? Most consumers there aren't looking for kiddy-blocks. When "kids" can go in and plop down cash to get internet access, it needs to be filtered. We don't allow them into theatres without ID on R-Rated movies...why should unfiltered internet be different? Show ID and you get unfiltered access, no ID, you get filtered. -- huh? \| AIM \| The beauty of ignorance is indescribable.
	to forum · permalink · 2007-04-20 21:05:59 ·
Desdinova Premium join:2003-01-26 Gaithersburg, MD	"We don't allow them into theatres without ID on R-Rated movies" We can if we want to. The ratings code is a guideline and carries no legal weight. The MPAA is a private organization and has no legal authority at all. A theatre can let a six year-old into an NC-17 movie if they wished. Sure, they'd be open to a lawsuit, but in our current litigious culture, they could also get sued by NOT letting the kid in (though I seriously doubt the latter suit would be won...).
	to forum · permalink · 2007-04-21 02:10:29 ·
Thaler Premium join:2004-02-02 Los Angeles, CA kudos:2 Reviews: ·DSL EXTREME	reply to manfmmd said by manfmmd: When "kids" can go in and plop down cash to get internet access, it needs to be filtered. We don't allow them into theatres without ID on R-Rated movies...why should unfiltered internet be different? Show ID and you get unfiltered access, no ID, you get filtered. Most unfiltered internet cafes I've seen won't allow single children to use their stations, or require some kind of parental consent sign-off. Of course, that was a while back, and I haven't stepped into an internet cafe in a long while. Put it this way, if I was paying a fee to access the internet, as an adult, I should be able to view it in all its glorious splendor. I probably won't, but I'm not paying money for a filter to tell me what I can and can't see.
	to forum · permalink · 2007-04-21 10:51:14 ·
manfmmd Premium join:2003-01-14 Earth, TX Reviews: ·AT&T Southwest	I'm not saying that adults shouldn't be able to view whatever they want to view. I'm saying that we should be able to have tools available to us to allow for easy filtering of content that is or can be considered not appropriate for kids and that the parent be able to USE these tools. Not the ISP, not the Government. Me, the PARENT. As technology grows and becomes more complicated we need to tools to be able to properly police our children's activities. -- huh? \| AIM \| The beauty of ignorance is indescribable.
	to forum · permalink · 2007-04-21 11:12:45 ·

SCO Chairman's War On Porn > Can't you see?