republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Up and Running » Security » Security » Nicholas Papadopoulos and updated.com
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Now even Avira wants to call out to 224.0.0.22 »
« Battling Security Vendors?  

Blue2
Premium
join:2004-04-14
France

Re: Nicholas Papadopoulos and updated.com

said by Steve See Profile :

Anybody asking somebody to edit a 2-year-old post is just being ridiculous (especially since they can start their own thread), but I suppose I could tone it down and suggest "get lost".

Suggesting that this might lead to litigation is way more than silly.

Steve

He did not ask to have the post "edited". He asked for it to be removed. There's a difference. One could imagine that he thought (rightly or wrongly) that the post could be considered libelous, slanderous, or calumnious.

slander n. oral defamation, in which someone tells one or more persons an untruth about another which untruth will harm the reputation of the person defamed. Slander is a civil wrong (tort) and can be the basis for a lawsuit... (See: defamation, fair comment)
»legal-dictionary.thefreedictiona···/slander

That is why NetFixer's response was a far more intelligent reply that he was merely quoting what he had read and considered "public knowlege".

It doesn't matter two cents what you think, unless you are going to be the judge or pay the legal expenses. I imagine that the statute of limitations for the printed word is longer than two years.

But like I said, don't take my word for this. By all means, if so inclined, go ahead and make a few disparaging comments yourself (Disclaimer: Not to be construed as legal counsel.) and report how it turns out. I for one, would refrain from ever giving legal advice that others might pay dearly for if I were wrong.
m0d

join:2005-03-02
ireland

Re: Nicholas Papadopoulos and updated.com

Good job Netfixer for at least giving him a chance to defend himself in public. Everybody deserves that.

"GFY" really is probably the correct answer for such an old post.

I find it sad how people think that litigation threats can prevent the truth/the opinion of a majority.

Remember that the public judges you and litigation threats just make you seem more dubious to us the majority.

Netfixer even apologized *if* you were actually treated unfairly? Would you care to elaborate on your case?
(topic locked)
Forums » Up and Running » Security » SecurityNow even Avira wants to call out to 224.0.0.22 »
« Battling Security Vendors?  


Tuesday, 01-Dec 00:58:06 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [56] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [47] Broadband Killed The Game Console
· [33] Rural Carriers Quickly Embracing Fiber
· [28] AT&T Top Lobbyist Cicconi Has His Feelings Hurt
· [24] Charter Exits Chapter 11
· [21] Midcontinent Socked With Easement Lawsuit
· [3] Monday Morning Links
· [2] Monday Evening Links
Most people now reading
· Is Microsoft Technet ok to use for my family PC's? [Microsoft Help]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· buying a one way ticket [General Questions]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· [Internet] Gaming problem for "Heroes of Newerth" ( New bell Upd [Bell Canada]
· Considering Leaving Vonage, who should I Consider? [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Are GPS's better today? [General Questions]
· [Rant] called out sick! [Rants, Raves, and Praise]
· Fun screwing with PuG raids. [World of Warcraft]
· Opening a file download dialog from a JavaScript function. [Webmasters and Developers]