Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Up and Running » Security » Security » Nicholas Papadopoulos and updated.com
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Now even Avira wants to call out to 224.0.0.22 »
« Battling Security Vendors?  
AuthorAll Replies

m0d

join:2005-03-02
ireland

reply to Blue2
Re: Nicholas Papadopoulos and updated.com

Good job Netfixer for at least giving him a chance to defend himself in public. Everybody deserves that.

"GFY" really is probably the correct answer for such an old post.

I find it sad how people think that litigation threats can prevent the truth/the opinion of a majority.

Remember that the public judges you and litigation threats just make you seem more dubious to us the majority.

Netfixer even apologized *if* you were actually treated unfairly? Would you care to elaborate on your case?


Blue2
Premium
join:2004-04-14
France

reply to Steve
said by Steve See Profile :

Anybody asking somebody to edit a 2-year-old post is just being ridiculous (especially since they can start their own thread), but I suppose I could tone it down and suggest "get lost".

Suggesting that this might lead to litigation is way more than silly.

Steve

He did not ask to have the post "edited". He asked for it to be removed. There's a difference. One could imagine that he thought (rightly or wrongly) that the post could be considered libelous, slanderous, or calumnious.

slander n. oral defamation, in which someone tells one or more persons an untruth about another which untruth will harm the reputation of the person defamed. Slander is a civil wrong (tort) and can be the basis for a lawsuit... (See: defamation, fair comment)
»legal-dictionary.thefreedictiona···/slander

That is why NetFixer's response was a far more intelligent reply that he was merely quoting what he had read and considered "public knowlege".

It doesn't matter two cents what you think, unless you are going to be the judge or pay the legal expenses. I imagine that the statute of limitations for the printed word is longer than two years.

But like I said, don't take my word for this. By all means, if so inclined, go ahead and make a few disparaging comments yourself (Disclaimer: Not to be construed as legal counsel.) and report how it turns out. I for one, would refrain from ever giving legal advice that others might pay dearly for if I were wrong.
Thread is
Forums » Up and Running » Security » SecurityNow even Avira wants to call out to 224.0.0.22 »
« Battling Security Vendors?  


Saturday, 05-Dec 20:21:29 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [163] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [147] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [128] Comcast Makes NBC Universal Acquisition Official
· [110] The Bandwidth Hog Does Not Exist
· [105] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [101] Google Invades ISP, OpenDNS Turf With Google Public DNS
· [85] FCC Ponders Moving From PSTN To IP Voice
· [81] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [80] New Bill Aims To Limit ETFs
· [74] Sprint Defuses GPS Privacy Media Bomb
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· First commercial tool to crack BitLocker arrives (Updated) [Security]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· UPS - What do you people think happened? [General Questions]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Wife might have to work in.... Iowa for a few months!!! [General Questions]
· Many Sites Unreachable [Rogers]
· DNS options, what are YOU using? [TekSavvy]
· [How to] Install Asterisk on an Asus WL-520GU router [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]