<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information in Security</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r18214001</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 19:44:11 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 19:44:11 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18241871</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/855835"><b>CajunTek</b></A> : Hmmm.. I use KAV and have it set up to the max.. and I've <B>tried to get vundo...</B> it kills it every time.. In fact even with BOClean it never gets to the point to run in memory so KAV kills it before BOC realizes it is there..<br><SMALL>--<br>da Cajun  Darn I hate Malware</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18241871</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 07:40:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18241762</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/655093"><b>Name Game</b></A> : What setting/configuration did you have on BOclean ?<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://nsclean.com/supboc.html" >nsclean.com/supboc.html</A><br><br> ;)<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/remark,18220152">Re: Ad-Aware False Positives?</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18241762</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 06:16:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18241748</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : If you didn't notice VM has NO AV on it and disabled security software.. better say that to be clear.<br><br>The vundo was just a plain old something KEYGEN.exe 31kb which drops the usual 27k Vundo into Winlogon<br><br>BOC detected the EXE and sure enough it deleted it but the DLL was already entered into the Winlogon registry and showing in Hijackthis, and couldnt be deleted by hand so it was running. BOClean soon gave an error and died.. mouse over tray icon it disappeared. So they crashed its kill and or delete routines ? perhaps.. might try that one again with AppDefend enabled<br><br>What I don't favour or understand is why KAV detect "virtumonde packed" and don't alarm.. OK it might be detected the next day.. still odd !]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18241748</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 05:59:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18241738</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Latest update was installed, I rebooted<br><br> <A HREF="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQa6EtkK-MY">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQa6EtkK-MY</A> <br><br>This video is the downloader, name is included and it turns out Kaspersky engine detects that downloader since Valentines day.. google the trojan name and look at F-Secure writeup. Sorry, next time I use VMware HIGH QUALITY I didnt realise would be only 2-3 MB. Still have the vid in quality though, just youtube blurred it :(<br><br>The BZUB is downloaded as well as something infecting the system files, and Windows CD warning comes up.. still no peep from BOC]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18241738</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 05:53:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18241702</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/655093"><b>Name Game</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by testings_r_good :</SMALL><br><br>I'm giving it a go, so far its 1/2 out of 3<br><br>1.. a new spambot was the first thing i tried after reading Kevin specifically say they miss and WE catch.<br><br>BZZT. complete fail detected no dropper and no DLL.<br><br>2.. a VUNDO.. BOClean stopped it ! but as someone has posted correctly it is having a problem removing the file. This is where a scanner can be used even if that has to occur in Safe Mode.. its something the user can do themselves. HALF POINT.<br><br>3.. a downloader.. FAIL.. and here comes lots of malware it downloaded.. a BZUB .. FAIL AGAIN.. this same BZUB is detected by AntiVir, AVG, BitDefender, KAV, Ewido, TrojanHunter and more and is days old<br><br>So far not impressed enough to bother going further..<br> </DIV> :D :D Another amateur VM tester..so what update did you use<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.nsclean.com/trolist.html" >www.nsclean.com/trolist.html</A><br><br>better go back to that thread now and read it again on what was found left and where it was found.  ;)<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/remark,18199654">HJT-   BYXYAAX.DLL & MORE</A><br>and when you tested that BOClean..turn off the rest of those AVs..and then have a set up in a lab actually trying to infect a machine..and if you don't know how to set that up try for some hint from this lab. It is a good one hour interview..but it will give you some hints.<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/remark,18239914">Mikko Hypponen on Emergent Virus Threats</A><br><SMALL>--<br>Gladiator Security Forum  &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.gladiator-antivirus.com/" >www.gladiator-antivirus.com/</A> <br>Missing Kids<br> &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.missingkids.com/" >www.missingkids.com/</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18241702</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 05:04:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18240742</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : I'm giving it a go, so far its 1/2 out of 3<br><br>1.. a new spambot was the first thing i tried after reading Kevin specifically say they miss and WE catch.<br><br>BZZT. complete fail detected no dropper and no DLL.<br><br>2.. a VUNDO.. BOClean stopped it ! but as someone has posted correctly it is having a problem removing the file. This is where a scanner can be used even if that has to occur in Safe Mode.. its something the user can do themselves. HALF POINT.<br><br>3.. a downloader.. FAIL.. and here comes lots of malware it downloaded.. a BZUB .. FAIL AGAIN.. this same BZUB is detected by AntiVir, AVG, BitDefender, KAV, Ewido, TrojanHunter and more and is days old<br><br>So far not impressed enough to bother going further..]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18240742</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:40:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18233016</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1249072"><b>buttoni</b></A> : Will do.  Thanks again.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18233016</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:31:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18232951</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1139743"><b>Rocky67</b></A> : You're gonna get multiple pop-ups from Comodo firewall asking if BOC and the BOC updater can connect out using several different TCP and UDP ports. Just give it permission and you're good to go. <br><SMALL>--<br>"The Internet? Is that thing still around?" - Homer</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18232951</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:18:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18232879</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1249072"><b>buttoni</b></A> : Thanks Grimy.  Good to hear they work together OK.  Sounds like I'm good to go.  Actually, I just checked and Im running CS 2.1.946 (I forgot the last update).  Think I'll give BOC a try!  <br><br>Comodo will hopefully alert me if I need to change anything in my FW settings.  Going to check over on the Comodo BOC forum to see if any settings recommendations are being recommended before installing.  I pretty much have Comodo's default settings right now.  <br><SMALL>--<br>-------<br>WinXP Home SP2; Firefox 1.5.10; IE6; Comodo 2.4; Avast4; CounterSpy 2.0; SBC/ATT DSL 2Wire modem</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18232879</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:03:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18231338</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/461572"><b>MarkAW</b></A> : I broke down yesterday and downloaded the CBO_4.23 and installed it with out un-installing BOC 4.22 and i haven't had any problems with either one as of yet.<br><br>I only did this to see what all the fuss was about un-installing 4.22 before installing 4.23.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18231338</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:04:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18231260</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1139743"><b>Rocky67</b></A> : I'm trying BOC 4.23 on an XP Pro SP2 system that also has CS 2.1.917 installed and haven't had any problems. Installation was smooth - CS asked me to OK new startup program and I had to make some changes to firewall rules to accomodate BOC and that was it.<br><SMALL>--<br>"The Internet? Is that thing still around?" - Homer</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18231260</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:52:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18231118</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1249072"><b>buttoni</b></A> : I'm contemplating installing BOClean 4.23 and am in the process of reading what on-line info is available at nsclean.com.  I'm running a 512K ram, WinXP machine with only what appears in my signature realtime.  <br><br>My question: Are there any members here running BOClean & CounterSpy 2.0 concurrently? Would like some feedback on BOClean compatibility with CS 2.0's heavy-duty realtime agents? The latest CS release moved a lot of it's listed 30+ realtime agents to the kernel level (greatly improving performance).  As the kernel level of the OS is waaaaay out of my league of computer knowledge, thought I'd ask members who may have had problems running the two programs. I would like to add the layer of protection BOC can  provide, but as I've never experienced a BSOD, I don't want to find out what that's like!  LOL<br><SMALL>--<br>-------<br>WinXP Home SP2; Firefox 1.5.10; IE6; Comodo 2.4; Avast4; CounterSpy 2.0; SBC/ATT DSL 2Wire modem</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18231118</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:26:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18229966</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/655093"><b>Name Game</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  munckman <A HREF="/useremail/u/837742"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>I have limited computer skills and for some unknown reason to me, I do get calls to fix them for free. More times than not, the first time I am asked to lend a hand, they have an expired AntiVirus that is still active. This is usually the only protection that is present and they brag about the fact they have an AV and ran a scan, as they should.<br><br>Thanks<br> </DIV>You will not necessarily get less calls since BOClean also has to be kept updated and there are many thing these days that can cause "slow down"<br><br>If those Free AV you have installed have real time protection and you have locked down the browsers and updated the OS and other applications that are Microsoft products.. including all the hotfixes..then who ever uses the PC has a better chance of survival since most now are running WinXP SP2 that now by default have a firewall installed and running as well as limited user when they hit the internet.<br><br>I mention all those things..since I know how long it really takes to do all those things and even update the java.<br><br>Even  paid tech do not do all of that..since time is money..but once you do Patch vulnerabilities..then would not even matter if the AV missed it.  :D<br><br>The name of the game out there today for the badboys is to EXPLOIT exiting vulnerabilities in the OS or other applications your friends are running...so no amount of AV's ..free or paid is really the answer if you have not plugged the holes in the first place..since tomorrow there will be a new vector trying to exploit that same vulnerability..just in a different way the AV can not stop.<br><br>Take all that into consideration and you will get less repeat phone calls.<br><SMALL>--<br>Gladiator Security Forum  &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.gladiator-antivirus.com/" >www.gladiator-antivirus.com/</A> Missing Kids &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.missingkids.com/" >www.missingkids.com/</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18229966</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 06:07:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18229692</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/837742"><b>munckman</b></A> : I have limited computer skills and for some unknown reason to me, I do get calls to fix them for free. More times than not, the first time I am asked to lend a hand, they have an expired AntiVirus that is still active. This is usually the only protection that is present and they brag about the fact they have an AV and ran a scan, as they should.<br><br>I set them up with one of the top 2 AV's (usually free versions) depending on how I perceive their ability to deal with updating and scanning. To some this may seem silly but to me it is an important consideration.<br><br>To ask them to run a AntiMalware Scanner is easy. I just wonder why I get calls asking "what should be done." I installed the scanner that I thought is best for them. I tell them to just follow the prompts for anything that is detected.<br><br>Many also get the usual passive protections but some object because they are informed of everything that I do and possible ramifications. If they express that they don't need anything else, they are of course right.<br><br>Firewalls are kinda tough to explain but if they don't install things often, I just install my favorite free one and run through their installed programs (usually not many) and have them watch the process. Just in case you wondered; yes I read the prompts out loud to them. Firewalls are a no win situation for me. Some do understand though!<br><br>So, if I installed BoClean on "these" systems, set with no prompts to delete and save deletes and with the owners' permission to do so will I get less repeat phone calls stating that "my computer is really slow?" <br><br>Thanks]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18229692</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 02:15:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18229083</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/817075"><b>Kiwi</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Name Game <A HREF="/useremail/u/655093"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>LOL Mele20 you put more spin on stuff than the Hollywood gossip column..when you're not sure.. just make things up. :D :D<br>Please keep us informed.<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://gladiator-antivirus.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=43823&hl=" >gladiator-antivirus.com/forum/in&middot;&middot;&middot;3823&hl=</A><br> </DIV>I don't care much for any other thread reality, It's better to divulge the number of incidents and results; from a product. It's not hard to strip down. The politics, I don't care for.<br><br>On the whole over time I have felt comfortable with BoClean, but I see several areas that the product is weak in. Does it matter, not to most people, I guess.<br><br>If anything I'm kinda miffed that BC has not answered to some serious issues related to Trojan_LIKE activity. But that's just me!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18229083</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 23:19:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18228079</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/655093"><b>Name Game</b></A> : LOL Mele20 you put more spin on stuff than the Hollywood gossip column..when you're not sure.. just make things up. :D :D<br>Please keep us informed.<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://gladiator-antivirus.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=43823&hl=" >gladiator-antivirus.com/forum/in&middot;&middot;&middot;3823&hl=</A><br><SMALL>--<br>Gladiator Security Forum  &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.gladiator-antivirus.com/" >www.gladiator-antivirus.com/</A> Missing Kids &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.missingkids.com/" >www.missingkids.com/</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18228079</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 20:32:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18227846</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/403861"><b>Mele20</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  tempnexus <A HREF="/useremail/u/103090"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br><div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Mele20 <A HREF="/useremail/u/403861"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</SMALL><br><br>It's not up to Kevin...it's Melih and look what he has already gone and done and then tried to save face in the Comodo forum with a lame excuse. I give Kevin six months tops at Comodo. <br> </DIV>Sorry, I am not really following the COMODO forum since I have no real interest in COMODO besides Boclean (although I did post a question there regarding the ability to update BOC 4.22).  What has happened besides the cosmetic changes?<br> </DIV>There is a BoClean forum at Comodo...you might want to keep up there if you are interested in BoClean.<br><br>Melih went and released BoClean without bothering to even tell Kevin he was doing so much less get Kevin's permission. Because it was premature and Kevin had no idea what Melih was doing there was no read me, etc and a bunch of complaints. Those who had purchased BoClean when Kevin and Nancy owned it were left out in the cold without their special version that Kevin promised. They were hurt. <br><br>Melih then tried to save face by concocting the notion that he had not released Comodo BoClean but that he had...yeah...without Kevin's knowledge or permission ....(but's what the big deal  there...I'm the boss...I can do as I please and treat my employees like shit if I want) had released "only" a Release Candidate.  Yeah, really....<br><br>I haven't read the Comodo forum today so I don't know the latest, but these kinds of shenanigans on the part of Melih I believe are likely partly why he he has difficulty attracting or keeping excellent employees.  Maybe everything will still end up working out great...but I sure have my doubts. <br><SMALL>--<br>"If you want to do DRM on a PC then you need to treat the user as the enemy." Ross Anderson in "`Trusted Computing' Frequently Asked Questions"<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.msfirefox.com/" >www.msfirefox.com/</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18227846</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 19:47:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18227682</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/601391"><b>Mats</b></A> : Good response..<br><br>And he didnt want to hear those answers??  Why, did they prove him wrong??  No, not at all..<br><br>By Dadkins response, his question wasnt answered.. It's so nice that you think they were though..]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18227682</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 19:13:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18227620</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/655093"><b>Name Game</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Mats <A HREF="/useremail/u/601391"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br><div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  mers2 <A HREF="/useremail/u/974615"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</SMALL><br><br>I've got to say,  dadkins <A HREF="/useremail/u/879997"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>, you've gotten a lot of answers that you just didn't want to hear.   </DIV>What answers did he get that he didnt want to hear?? Show just one of them.. <br><br>Nobody could answer his question is more like it. He is right about everything he said about BOC.<br> </DIV>He found out BOClean works with Vista but not Dadkins.<br><SMALL>--<br>Gladiator Security Forum  &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.gladiator-antivirus.com/" >www.gladiator-antivirus.com/</A> Missing Kids &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.missingkids.com/" >www.missingkids.com/</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18227620</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 19:01:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18227617</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/974615"><b>mers2</b></A> : Read any of Kevin's responses, or  Name Game <A HREF="/useremail/u/655093"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>'s, or a number of other users.  The answers were there.  I'm not going to take the time to go through and point them out to you.  Specific questions were asked and answered.  <br><SMALL>--<br><B><A HREF="/forum/disco">Team Discovery</A></B><br></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18227617</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 19:00:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18227447</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/601391"><b>Mats</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  mers2 <A HREF="/useremail/u/974615"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>I've got to say,  dadkins <A HREF="/useremail/u/879997"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>, you've gotten a lot of answers that you just didn't want to hear.   </DIV>What answers did he get that he didnt want to hear?? Show just one of them.. <br><br>Nobody could answer his question is more like it. He is right about everything he said about BOC.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18227447</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:27:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18224858</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/610684"><b>tmaertin</b></A> : found this in the BOClean forum on the Comodo website on page 13 - posted by Melih of Comodo fame...a link to download 4.23 directly from comodo (3rd post from the bottom). sorry i could not link the .exe directly but i found that is against forum rules<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://forums.comodo.com/index.php/topic,7641.150.html" >forums.comodo.com/index.php/topi&middot;&middot;&middot;150.html</A><br><br>i checked the link to the author site on majorgeeks.com (posted above) and it links to the same download site. i also registered and received my confirmation # from Comodo.<br><br>i downloaded and am testing 4.23 now and yes, it was free. regarding all the above posts - since its free - just try it and see! i have never used it but have heard many great things. maybe it will work for me - maybe it will not. <br><SMALL>--<br>Hike up your skirt a little more - and show your world to me...</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18224858</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 09:44:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18224789</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/103090"><b>tempnexus</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Mele20 <A HREF="/useremail/u/403861"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>It's not up to Kevin...it's Melih and look what he has already gone and done and then tried to save face in the Comodo forum with a lame excuse. I give Kevin six months tops at Comodo. <br> </DIV>Sorry, I am not really following the COMODO forum since I have no real interest in COMODO besides Boclean (although I did post a question there regarding the ability to update BOC 4.22).  What has happened besides the cosmetic changes?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18224789</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 09:28:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18224522</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/403861"><b>Mele20</b></A> : It's not up to Kevin...it's Melih and look what he has already gone and done and then tried to save face in the Comodo forum with a lame excuse. I give Kevin six months tops at Comodo. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18224522</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 08:07:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18224442</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/855835"><b>CajunTek</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  mers2 <A HREF="/useremail/u/974615"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>I've got to say,  dadkins <A HREF="/useremail/u/879997"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>, you've gotten a lot of answers that you just didn't want to hear.  You have had your mind made up for along time and there is no changing it - no matter what is said or done.  It's one of your good points and one of your bad points all at the same time.  :)  I do love ya though. <br> </DIV>Exactly... dadkins is wrong here (because I'm right ;) ) and we disagree... but he has every right to continue being wrong... Unless of course he's right.. then we are all going to be really embarassed...  :o<br><SMALL>--<br>da Cajun  Darn I hate Malware</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18224442</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 07:13:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18224245</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/974615"><b>mers2</b></A> : I've got to say,  dadkins <A HREF="/useremail/u/879997"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>, you've gotten a lot of answers that you just didn't want to hear.  You have had your mind made up for along time and there is no changing it - no matter what is said or done.  It's one of your good points and one of your bad points all at the same time.  :)  I do love ya though. <br><SMALL>--<br><B><A HREF="/forum/disco">Team Discovery</A></B><br></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18224245</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 04:26:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18224218</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/752438"><b>bellgamin</b></A> : Kevin is a security protection genius -- one of the original gurus. Problem is, he has been buried by the need to work solo in dealing with developing sigs for all the new malware that comes out daily. Kasperski, Symantec, et al, all have multiple analysts to handle the load. For whatever reason, Kevin has been on his own.<br><br>BOClean was a work of genius in its day. PERHAPS that day is nearly at sunset, but the brilliant mind behind its creation is still there.<br><br>Now that Kevin is free-at-last from the drudgery of doing sig development, he will finally have the time to put his immense talents to work on innovating new & better ways to deal with the fact that the out-moded "blacklist-approach" is being buried by the burgeoning amount & sophistication of new malware, the morphing, & the resultant bloating of security programs that are sig-based.<br><br>Nowadays I mainly rely on HIPS & ShadowSurfer, but I still use BOC as a highly valued extra-security-layer. I fully expect BOC 5 (or whatever they decide to name it) to totally blow everybody's mind when it comes out.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18224218</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 03:42:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18219542</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/957998"><b>NICK ADSL UK</b></A> : It's now available through major geeks via there software section <br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.majorgeeks.com/Comodo_BOClean_Anti-Malware_d5616.html" >www.majorgeeks.com/Comodo_BOClea&middot;&middot;&middot;616.html</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18219542</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 11:47:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18218652</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/761551"><b>sharpy merc</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Buddel <A HREF="/useremail/u/966177"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>YAWN! Where is the padlock?<br> </DIV>As a BOC fanboi. even I agree with the above, this thread gone boring.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18218652</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 07:41:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18218581</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/966177"><b>Buddel</b></A> : YAWN! Where is the padlock?<div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap WIDTH=33%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/18218581?c=1155574&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IxODIxNDAwMS54bWw%3D"><IMG TITLE="233 bytes" BORDER=0 WIDTH=14 HEIGHT=15 SRC="/r0/download/1155574~142019d1fa3d86654fbc161b44739c9c/yellockfolder.gif"></A></TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18218581</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 06:59:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18218568</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/655093"><b>Name Game</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Stem Bolt <A HREF="/useremail/u/717751"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br><div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  dadkins <A HREF="/useremail/u/879997"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>Yes! Exactly!<br><br>Well, it aint my fault!<br>Trying to milk a program when it's better days are behind it... <br><br> </DIV>How about saving all that venom you have for the new Spiderman movie? It's only a week or so away. :)<br> </DIV>He needs all his energy to keep his pirated copy of BOClean updated along with the rest fo the free programs he has download to test and trial..don't confuse the boy.<br><SMALL>--<br>Gladiator Security Forum  &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.gladiator-antivirus.com/" >www.gladiator-antivirus.com/</A> <br>Missing Kids<br> &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.missingkids.com/" >www.missingkids.com/</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18218568</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 06:53:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18218547</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/717751"><b>Stem Bolt</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  dadkins <A HREF="/useremail/u/879997"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>Yes! Exactly!<br><br>Well, it aint my fault!<br>Trying to milk a program when it's better days are behind it... <br><br> </DIV>How about saving all that venom you have for the new Spiderman movie? It's only a week or so away. :)<br><SMALL>--<br><B><A HREF="http://www.drweb.com">Dr. Web</A></B>, <B><A HREF="http://www.nsclean.com">BOCLEAN</A></B>, Router/Firewall, Firefox, Acronis True Image</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18218547</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 06:37:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18218545</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/658312"><b>danny9</b></A> : I have to wonder if it is BOClean causing the problem. In the years I've used it, never have I had a problem installing anything.<br>I have used Prevx with BOClean and they have run very well together.<br>Is BOClean throwing up pop ups?<br>If so you might want to post this question at the Comodo forums if you need further assistance. :)<br><SMALL>--<br>I'm an Einstoner and crunch for BBR Team Starfire Einstein @ Home! Join Us! VoicePulse 07/29/04</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18218545</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 06:35:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18218412</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1304319"><b>Psicop</b></A> : Hi guys,<br><br>I am also an Avast user, and using now BoClean. I still keep SpywareBlaster as the only other antispyware program.<br><br>My question is:<br><br>I tried to install Prevx1 for an additional layer (as I only use Windows XP firewall) but BoClean didn't like it (it didn'tlet me finish the install process) and had to get rid of it.<br><br>Is BoClean enough protection?<br>If not what other progie can I use that doesn't conflict with BC?<br><br>I always access the Internet under limited.<br><br>Thx.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18218412</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 04:02:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18218347</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/327578"><b>hayc59</b></A> : Dave...Keep it real[for sho] and livin the dream<br>you da man!!  ;) ;)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18218347</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 02:47:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18218187</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/817075"><b>Kiwi</b></A> : David, I'm smiling.<br><br>BoClean does have a rather interesting array of protection, left out by AV's. I have owned BC for a rather long time and only noted one hit, though I'm not into deliberate infections on this drive.<br><br>Just for *Grins* I don't personally run any AV, I did BC because I got tired of having to deal with too many animals.<br><br>I'll say this though <br>1. I felt a wee bit more comfortable running BoClean. <br>2. BC does not take care of the on line gaming hacks, that occur with Punkbuster or any other ASPI hook program that the user loads on their system. Meaning the deficiency I see is that provided the user does not install a progo root kit, BC  will see it. Otherwise, you are pretty much on your own.<br><br>Remember though not even an AV will catch these.<br><br>The really sad epitaph to this is those game root kits aimed at protecting the user don't work at all. I was on COD2 a couple of days ago and while *Punkbuster* was enabled (Screen stated) There were two players 'Talking' about how to cheat, while one was doing so! I can't stand cheats anymore than I can these damn fools wasting every ones time with trojans, worms, or a virus. These folks need a life.<br><br>The price for a game ASPI root kit is a slower system, until cleaned; until the next time.<br><br>So, does BoClean catch everything, no not at all. <br>[Edit] To be fair though, perhaps the EULA of these progo's prevent a BoClean intervention. If anybody really reads the install EULA, most would take the progo back -Of course the assurance is that one can't, because it was an opened software product. Damn if you do, damn if you don't.<br><br>Aside, the net qualms.<br><br>Cheers]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18218187</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 01:22:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18216829</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1273149"><b>Alphalutra1</b></A> : Dadkins, it is no wonder that avast is catching everything in your escapades on the internet.  Avast has a built-in webscanner, that direclty scans all of the traffic before it gets to your computer: an excellent security feature, but it is bound to beat boclean to every thing since it scans first  ;)<br><br>As to the Comodo Boclean thing, let's see how it pans out.  I may even install it on another pc since I would like to see how it runs and such.  The really interesting thing is what will happen once development starts up since Kevin won't have to worry so much about signatures since he will have a team.  Then, it will be a very interesting product.<br><br>Cheers,<br><br>Alphalutra1<br><SMALL>--<br>OpenBSD for all your needs...</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18216829</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 19:48:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18216684</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1159554"><b>norwegian</b></A> : I am going to go completely off topic here. Hopefully WCB will allow it.<br><br>Dadkins, you rely on Avast right. See this link on detection<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.virus.gr/english/fullxml/default.asp?id=82&mnu=82" >www.virus.gr/english/fullxml/def&middot;&middot;&middot;2&mnu=82</A> <br><br>Here's another<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.av-comparatives.org/" >www.av-comparatives.org/</A><br><br>At the end of the day, IF you don't run limited user accounts, which no doubt will be most out there, you need protection. Nothing is 100%. Relying on Avast alone will not keep you all warm and fuzzy. Neither will Kaspersky, nor Nod, nor Norton as the A/V companies out there don't run the same engines, and share all the malware found.<br><br>Boclean is just an extra layer some choose to run. It is small in footprint, and rarely causes any conflicts, and of course you have the service of Kevin and Nancy up until Comodo bought it. Hopefully now Kevin can, and will concentrate on the next version.<br><br>No need to be putting people down for wanting the extra layer is there. Personally, we should be pushing LUA in the O/S, but even it has its draw-backs, and it is an extra layer too, but even it gets criticism, hopefully the end-user will make the right choice for them, regardless of all the antics.  <br><SMALL>--<br>The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing - Edmund Burke</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18216684</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 19:07:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18216500</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1350120"><b>Graycode</b></A> : It seems some have a vendetta against the product and its authors.  Yet the original topic, Comodo making BoClean available for free, seems like a good thing that should be applauded instead of maligned by repeating rhetoric.<br><br>After trying several others I bought a few copies and have been very happy with it.  It's done a very good job of protecting my parents and other relatives' machines, having stopped potential problems on several occasions.  BoClean has never done any harm to our PC's, only good.  That's more than I can say for some other products that we've used.<br><br>We're keeping BoClean because my own family has personally benefited from it.  I hope more of my friends & co-workers will also get some benefit from this new Comodo version.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18216500</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 18:20:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18216378</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : This is what I understand boclean does<br><BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>quote:</SMALL><HR>"...BOClean will run in the background automatically, monitoring your system for anything which attempts to startup and run which manages to slip past your various "file scanners." The reason why BOClean does not do "file scans" is that most backdoor trojan horses elude file scanning entirely..." <br><br>"...If a program or the desktop itself has been infected by a memory "injection" into another program, BOClean may shut down a legitimate program which is infected, or may reset your desktop, causing it to go blank and then reappear..."<br><br>"...If a "trojan horse" or other malware is present on your machine, BOClean will shut it down FIRST, then you'll receive a warning box and you will be prompted by BOClean asking if you want to remove the offending file and clean up its remains. If you are running BOClean in regular standalone mode, you will be able to hit YES to perform a safe cleanup, or you can hit the NO button to delay cleanup if there is some valid reason. If you hit the YES button, the trojan horse will be removed from your hard disk and the windows registry. There is NO NEED to disconnect from the internet or your network and a reboot is not necessary either. In the RARE situation where you are using a remote control trojan horse or other known malware and INTEND to be using it, you can use the BOClean EXCLUDE screen as described later to tell BOClean to IGNORE any nasties you INTEND to use for whatever purposes. You can ALSO use the Excluder to tell BOClean to be gentle on any poorly behaved programs from other vendors that make the machine crash. See below..."<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.nsclean.com/supboc.html" >www.nsclean.com/supboc.html</A><HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br>I thought boclean was not able to scan files, yet dadkins manage to get boclean to scan leaktest.exe. I'm confused :D<br><BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>quote:</SMALL><HR>"...The reason why BOClean does not do "file scans" is that most backdoor trojan horses elude file scanning entirely..." &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.nsclean.com/supboc.html" >www.nsclean.com/supboc.html</A><HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br>I fail to see the purpose of boclean blocking leaktest? It only sends an outbound connection to grc server and has no malware signatures, that I know of.<br><br>What makes it think it's "trojan horse" thats trying to make an outbound connection?<br><br>Plus, it fails at stopping it from making an outbound connection because it's a tad slow to take action in my computer. I uploaded an .avi video showing how it's slow to respond in my comp.<br><br>Sorry i'm just curious by nature any clarification will be much appreciated :D<div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap WIDTH=33%><A HREF="/r0/download/1155336~d6eea8fc1ae9588c2c5ad495382859ff/bocleanvideo.zip"><IMG  align=absmiddle TITLE="download" SRC="http://i.dslr.net/silk/compress.png" border=0 width=16 height=16><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/1ptrans.gif" WIDTH=10 HEIGHT=1 border=0><big>bocleanvideo.zip</big></A> <small>836,034 bytes</small></TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18216378</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 17:52:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18216352</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/655093"><b>Name Game</b></A> : uloggvorbissys.dll <br><br>don't delete that .dll even if that gal whispers in yer ear.<br><br>Have a great evening buddy.. ;)<br><SMALL>--<br>Gladiator Security Forum  &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.gladiator-antivirus.com/" >www.gladiator-antivirus.com/</A> Missing Kids &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.missingkids.com/" >www.missingkids.com/</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18216352</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 17:44:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18216332</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/879997"><b>dadkins</b></A> : Yes! Exactly!<br><br>It's a whole new game, and some things are just tired.<br><br>Well, it aint my fault!<br>Trying to milk a program when it's better days are behind it... <br><br>Y'all need to figure that one out for yourselves.<br><br>I'm out!  :)<br><SMALL>--<br>Think outside the Fox... <A HREF="http://www.opera.com/">Opera</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18216332</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 17:38:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18216324</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/655093"><b>Name Game</b></A> : Think you better do some more reading on those products you run..and also go back and read the links in the above post..you just ramble.. :D :D<br><br>AVAST<br>III. Performing the Scan:<br><br>Right click on the blue circle with the white "a" inside (Fig 1). <br>Left click on "Start avast! Antivirus" (Fig 2). <br>Allow the test of Memory and Startup to run;<br>a blue rectangular screen will appear as shown in Figure 6.<br>On the right side of the blue rectangle in Figure 6 are three icons.<br>The top icon looks like a blue box or hard drive.<br>Left click on this icon and a box will pop up (Fig 8). <br> <br><br>Figure 8<br> <br>Slide the bar to the right until it says "Thorough Scan".<br><B>Also put a check mark in the box beside "Scan archive files".</B><br>Left click on the triangle icon on the left (looks like a 'play' button).<br>The scan will begin and run to completion. <br>If a virus is detected, a siren will be heard and a woman's voice will announce "A virus has been detected".<br>Left click on the "Delete" option.<br>In the next Window, Left click on "Delete permanently".  <br><B>here are some pretty picture and hint for you</B><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.cpals.com/avast_01.html" >www.cpals.com/avast_01.html</A><br><SMALL>--<br>Gladiator Security Forum  &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.gladiator-antivirus.com/" >www.gladiator-antivirus.com/</A> <br>Missing Kids<br> &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.missingkids.com/" >www.missingkids.com/</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18216324</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 17:36:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18216305</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/879997"><b>dadkins</b></A> : Yep... no .dlls, huh?<br><br>Take care people!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18216305</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 17:31:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18216269</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/655093"><b>Name Game</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  dadkins <A HREF="/useremail/u/879997"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>Yep!<br>Thanks Name Game! :)<br><br>EDIT: Well, it's been fun people!<br>Y'all keep teiing yourselves that BOC is the shiznit!<br><br>Some of us know better.  ;)<br> </DIV> :D<br>uloggvorbissys.dll <br>84.0 KB / 2006-12-22 2 / 0 Indefinido  Process Monitor / Processes<br> <br>%program_files%\archivos comunes\ulead systems\mpeg\<br>7f1d6c01f46ea970312baf1dca08949c ulOggVorbisSys. ulOggVorbisSys.dll <br><br>Ulead Systems, Inc.    <br><SMALL>--<br>Gladiator Security Forum  &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.gladiator-antivirus.com/" >www.gladiator-antivirus.com/</A> Missing Kids &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.missingkids.com/" >www.missingkids.com/</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18216269</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 17:21:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18216234</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/655093"><b>Name Game</b></A> : I understand dadkins apprehension. In the days when only TDS or TH was out there to address trojans and worms since AV's were looking the other way..BOClean was there for many users and did a very good job at stopping the madness. It also was then very good at tackling Malware when even the TDS, TH and those slow to wake up AV vendors were still saying "if it is not a virus " don't call us.<br>During the Interim Adaware was there for spyware and adware..and then came along Spybot S&D. But still all through that period of time..BOClean was still there..and since it uses a very unconventional method..it was stopping virus..trojans..worms..spyware..adware..and it survived.<br><br>I would have never..during all that time..tell anyone to dump all the rest of the stuff..free or paid..but BOClean was still in the background doing it's job and well worth the money then..saved many peoples butts.<br><br>Today it is a whole new ballgame..you need something to do it all. The Security Companies are coming out with Suites.<br>They will struggle..some will go belly up..some AV's and even Antispyware proggies will drop out of sight..just like TDS did one day.<br><br>I always suggested most everyone who posted their long list of Security proggies some (active some passive)..all ran TOO many ..especially those who were loading and running multiple real time protection.<br><br>This week superantispyware is a good choice if you get whacked by some of the most serious "in tne wild" crap you "have to clean off" and still have some operation left on your PC..tomorrow ??? who knows.<br><br>So I suggest you go lean and mean..just watch where you surf.<br><SMALL>--<br>Gladiator Security Forum  &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.gladiator-antivirus.com/" >www.gladiator-antivirus.com/</A> <br>Missing Kids<br> &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.missingkids.com/" >www.missingkids.com/</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18216234</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 17:11:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18216157</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/879997"><b>dadkins</b></A> : Yep!<br>Thanks Name Game! :)<br><br>EDIT: Well, it's been fun people!<br>Y'all keep teiing yourselves that BOC is the shiznit!<br><br>Some of us know better.  ;)<div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/18216157?c=1155320&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IxODIxNDAwMS54bWw%3D"><IMG TITLE="50520 bytes" BORDER=0 WIDTH=521 HEIGHT=272 SRC="/r0/download/1155320~5a33039e70899f3b2e8f9e2e6fd01a51/ScreenShot039.jpg"></A><br>What is being scanned? Where?</TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18216157</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 16:50:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18216144</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/655093"><b>Name Game</b></A> : For a refresher course  :) These links will tell you when and what your memory is used for and why.<br><br>When you download a file from the internet it does not load into memory.<br><br>.dll do not load into memory. you need an .exe to do it.<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.easydesksoftware.com/dll.htm" >www.easydesksoftware.com/dll.htm</A><br><br>Running a Program<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.myshoggoth.com/Articles/WhyDoesSetupMakeWindowsRe.html" >www.myshoggoth.com/Articles/WhyD&middot;&middot;&middot;sRe.html</A><br><SMALL>--<br>Gladiator Security Forum  &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.gladiator-antivirus.com/" >www.gladiator-antivirus.com/</A> Missing Kids &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.missingkids.com/" >www.missingkids.com/</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18216144</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 16:47:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18216106</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/879997"><b>dadkins</b></A> : Thank You Don!<br><br>A voice of reason... refreshing!<br><br>Yeah, I have licenses for ALL kinds of applications as well.<br><br>Most are collecting dust now though.<br>I scan with a "few" weekly - for the hell of it.<br>None of them ever find anything other than cookies... <br>Since I seem to never get "nasties" stored on the machines, something other than my AV running as resident looking for something to ru is... a waste of time and resources.<br><br>I have several I *could* run, but why?<br>No one has ever given me a clear reason as to why BOC is the best.<br>All I ever get is BS and double talk. <br>Well, you know what they say about BS. <br><br>Well, cookies are harmless. If "x" wishes to remove a few(dozen) cookies cool! I'l get more! LOL!<br><br>Currently, 890 cookies on this new laptop... no telling how many on my A Series laptop!  :o<br><br>*I* am not worried about cookies, Ya know?  ;)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18216106</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 16:34:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18216101</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1122322"><b>Don Pelotas</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  dadkins <A HREF="/useremail/u/879997"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>Thanks Don, I know this.<br><br>But if you have ever read some of the posts here from certain BOC users, seeing that I have it on my A Series laptop, my lawn should be greener and weed free!<br><br>Well, it just aint so!<br><br>*IF* I were to use a Resident anti-malware, BOC would not be it! <br><br>I call 'em as I see 'em...<br><br>BOC aint all that!  :huh:<br><br>Layers, ok, when do the layers become silly?<br>Av, AT, BOC, AVG/Ewido, Hosts, ProcessGuard, Proxomitron, WinPatrol, SpywareBlaster, SpyBot S&D TeaTimer, AdAware AdWatch... say when!<br><br>Where do *WE* draw the line?<br> </DIV>I don't know where you draw the line, David, i only use a few tools at any given time, but have licenses for many simply because i have an interest in this. If it's any consolation for you BOClean would not be it either anymore for me, but i hope improvements is in the pipeline for those many that will now install it because it's free.<br><br>For most surfers an AV is enough still despite the doomsday tone sometimes, for others the apps you mention might not be enough!  :D<br><br>I say it's up to the individual user what combination he/she prefers.  :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18216101</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 16:33:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18216099</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/879997"><b>dadkins</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by nomoclean :</SMALL><br><br> <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>quote:</SMALL><HR>Where do *WE* draw the line?<HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br>Don't know about "WE". Do suggest <B>you</B> draw the line here and now. Yawn...your amateurish postings are so <B>boring</B>. So you don't fancy software X, right? Pick a different one and move on. It's as simple as that.<br> </DIV>Anon?<br>LOL!<br>Speaking of move on...<br><SMALL>--<br>Think outside the Fox... <A HREF="http://www.opera.com/">Opera</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18216099</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 16:32:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18216068</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>quote:</SMALL><HR>Where do *WE* draw the line?<HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br>Don't know about "WE". Do suggest <B>you</B> draw the line here and now. Yawn...your amateurish postings are so <B>boring</B>. So you don't fancy software X, right? Pick a different one and move on. It's as simple as that.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18216068</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 16:23:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18215975</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/879997"><b>dadkins</b></A> : Thanks Don, I know this.<br><br>But if you have ever read some of the posts here from certain BOC users, seeing that I have it on my A Series laptop, my lawn should be greener and weed free!<br><br>Well, it just aint so!<br><br>*IF* I were to use a Resident anti-malware, BOC would not be it! <br><br>I call 'em as I see 'em...<br><br>BOC aint all that!  :huh:<br><br>Layers, ok, when do the layers become silly?<br>Av, AT, BOC, AVG/Ewido, Hosts, ProcessGuard, Proxomitron, WinPatrol, SpywareBlaster, SpyBot S&D TeaTimer, AdAware AdWatch... say when!<br><br>Where do *WE* draw the line?<br><SMALL>--<br>Think outside the Fox... <A HREF="http://www.opera.com/">Opera</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18215975</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 15:56:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18215923</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/879997"><b>dadkins</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  richter35 <A HREF="/useremail/u/925035"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>*Yawn*<br><br>This little gem is so overrated, IMO. It does nothing special and yet it lacks a lot of things competition has been offering for quite some time.<br><br>It took them a month to insert a logo (which I personally don't like and would be better off without it)? Yes, they are updating infrastructure and it could be updating from new servers and all that. I get it. I just don't see what possibly would have to be changed for software which had no serial protection of whatever kind...so inserting logo almost doubles installation file? <br><br>Earlier I read that a guy got infected because he disabled BOC, then it was KAV's fault because it did not remove infection properly...Isn't BOC's MAIN marketing hype compatibility with 3rd party software and the fact that it acts BEFORE your antivirus? If KAV detected infection after guy got infected, then it would most likely kill it before it happened (as it had signatures), and how could KAV mess things up if everyone here said millions of times that it catches stuff before antivirus?<br><br>I can understand how this can be extra protection for those who are careless, but I just don't dig that &#132;private club&#147; thing, that it's better than others and all that. We've no evidence and it's certainly nothing special. Detection rate, performance, features...it is behind competition (at this moment). See no advantage of using it at all as most decent antivirus got you covered well that it will get rid of things before BOC has a chance to remove infection in memory. Besides, noone can really tell how good it performs against others. The only thing now that will be said is: it's free. If you don't like it, don't use it. Which means that you can't say anything negative because you didn't pay for it. <br> </DIV>Well put!<br>Thanks richter35!<br><SMALL>--<br>Think outside the Fox... <A HREF="http://www.opera.com/">Opera</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18215923</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 15:44:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18215905</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/655093"><b>Name Game</b></A> : <B>Isn't BOC's MAIN marketing hype compatibility with 3rd party software and the fact that it acts BEFORE your antivirus?</B> <br><br>Just the opposite.. :D :D it acts when stuff tries to load in the memory..but the 'hype' you are talking about comes from people who have no idea even how their own AV works or when it loads or even what kind of engines their particular AV is ruinning in its real time detection mode.<br><br>To get an idea on what does happen..you can read this 3 year old write up<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.anti-trojan-software-reviews.com/review-boclean.htm" >www.anti-trojan-software-reviews&middot;&middot;&middot;lean.htm</A><br><br><SMALL>--<br>Gladiator Security Forum  &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.gladiator-antivirus.com/" >www.gladiator-antivirus.com/</A> <br>Missing Kids<br> &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.missingkids.com/" >www.missingkids.com/</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18215905</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 15:41:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18215882</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1122322"><b>Don Pelotas</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  dadkins <A HREF="/useremail/u/879997"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>Yes friend!<br>I know how BOC (is supposed to) work.<br><br>NO ONE, for any reason gets me to kill my AV. LOL!<br><br><B><br>My point is, having BOC sitting there doing - nothing, is a waste!<br>It is!<br></B><br><br>I have read MANY posts here at DSLR about BOC pouncing on whatever and saving someone from certain disaster.<br><br>Ok, cool!<br>Well, something must be wrong from the start if BOC ever gets to *SEE* the malware.<br>That means, something FAILED in preventing the malware form getting on the machine.<br>BOC only sees something if it is running in memory, right?<br><br>Who dropped the ball and allowed ??? on the machine?<br><br>No amount of me clicking on every freakin link I see has made BOC do - anything! <br><br>No!<br>My machine(s) are NOT locked down!<br>I do NOT have stuff disabled - ANY of it!<br>I run as Administrator at all times.<br>I have ALWAYS ran as Administrator.<br><br>Can anyone here explain how I(and many others) have ran this way for years without BOC and no infections?<br><br>Naw, didn't think ya could...  :uhh:<br> </DIV>Actually it's the point of layered defense, David, your AV should do the majority of the work and only when this fails should whatever extra you use step in.  :)<br><br>Don't get me wrong, i do not have the high opinion of BOClean that some have because i have seen it been shutdown by malware after telling me the malware is killed too many times.... so i do not trust it longer than i can throw it, but the point of layered defense is that it should step in after the AV fails and if AV handles everything...................then great IMHO, but you can't fault an AT/AS etc for not detecting what your AV has already nailed.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18215882</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 15:37:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18215846</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/925035"><b>richter35</b></A> : *Yawn*<br><br>This little gem is so overrated, IMO. It does nothing special and yet it lacks a lot of things competition has been offering for quite some time.<br><br>It took them a month to insert a logo (which I personally don't like and would be better off without it)? Yes, they are updating infrastructure and it could be updating from new servers and all that. I get it. I just don't see what possibly would have to be changed for software which had no serial protection of whatever kind...so inserting logo almost doubles installation file? <br><br>Earlier I read that a guy got infected because he disabled BOC, then it was KAV's fault because it did not remove infection properly...Isn't BOC's MAIN marketing hype compatibility with 3rd party software and the fact that it acts BEFORE your antivirus? If KAV detected infection after guy got infected, then it would most likely kill it before it happened (as it had signatures), and how could KAV mess things up if everyone here said millions of times that it catches stuff before antivirus?<br><br>I can understand how this can be extra protection for those who are careless, but I just don't dig that &#132;private club&#147; thing, that it's better than others and all that. We've no evidence and it's certainly nothing special. Detection rate, performance, features...it is behind competition (at this moment). See no advantage of using it at all as most decent antivirus got you covered well that it will get rid of things before BOC has a chance to remove infection in memory. Besides, noone can really tell how good it performs against others. The only thing now that will be said is: it's free. If you don't like it, don't use it. Which means that you can't say anything negative because you didn't pay for it. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18215846</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 15:28:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18215540</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/655093"><b>Name Game</b></A> : I'am gonna tell  :p<br><br>BTW- don't ever take a txt file..put bubble gum in it..then rename it netbus.exe and mail it to yourself..AVAST will start chewing on it and bust the bubble. ;) then you will have to start using patch.exe.<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://forums.techguy.org/security/523030-avast-alleges-trojan-netbus-n.html" >forums.techguy.org/security/5230&middot;&middot;&middot;s-n.html</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18215540</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 14:25:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18215534</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/879997"><b>dadkins</b></A> : Well, y'all have fun with this!<br><br>I have to go to BestBuy and get something(BD time!).<br><br>I'll keep waiting for BOC to do... something. LOL!<br><br>Ya know, back when I had Giant... at least it did something!<br><br>Now, could it be that the AV companies have stepped it up and residents just don't get a chance anymore, or are the residents(including BOC) just not all that people claim any longer?<br><br>Hmmm...<br><br>AL well!<br>Thanks people! <br>Happy Downloading!  :)<br><SMALL>--<br>Think outside the Fox... <A HREF="http://www.opera.com/">Opera</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18215534</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 14:24:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18215506</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/879997"><b>dadkins</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Name Game <A HREF="/useremail/u/655093"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br><div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  dadkins <A HREF="/useremail/u/879997"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>Thanks Again Name Game!<br><br>You see, all the BS about BOC and NetBus... well, I DID have a hell of a time with NetBus making it here for me to test.<br>That Damned AV I have running, huh?<br><br>;)<br> </DIV>No wonder Comcast is having so much trouble..you are stacking up all those NetBus electrons on the big pipe and slowing the whole shebang for the rest of the customers..don't deny it now..you cant convince me otherwise. :o<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.boston.com/business/personaltech/articles/2007/03/12/not_so_fast_broadband_providers_tell_big_users/" >www.boston.com/business/personal&middot;&middot;&middot;g_users/</A><br> </DIV>LMAO! Now THAT is funny!  :D<br><SMALL>--<br>Think outside the Fox... <A HREF="http://www.opera.com/">Opera</A></SMALL><div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/18215506?c=1155235&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IxODIxNDAwMS54bWw%3D"><IMG TITLE="88503 bytes" BORDER=0 WIDTH=568 HEIGHT=438 SRC="/r0/download/1155235~88dea6ec378c642e034c17c96a0d0084/ScreenShot038.jpg"></A><br>DAMN! I'm just KILLING the network, huh? :-D</TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18215506</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 14:17:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18215503</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/879997"><b>dadkins</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Ryan <A HREF="/useremail/u/332558"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>Dadkins it completely depends on your browsing habits. Many users tend to get infected from social networking sites and p2p software which have constantly updated threats which can sometimes slip by your av. The whole point is that you have that extra layer of protection for when it does slip by it. No AV is 100% especially with detecting trojans. I agree with you that you dont need boclean or any AT, and I dont personally need it either, but peoples whose browsing habits are not up to par do need it especially with all the variants and packers/creators. Also how do you expect to test boclean without disabling your av maybe on a test machine or at least without getting the latest trojans of warez or p2p or social networking sites.  <br> </DIV>Look friend, the WHOLE point about all the people here turfing BOC is that even with an AV, shit gets by, right?<br><br>Ok, well, crunch these numbers if you would.<br><br>I *DO* use P2P!<br>I download from... where ever! Whomever!<br>I surf to "Less Than Friendly" sites daily... for kicks!<br>I surf all kinds of pr0n sites. Sue me!<br><br>So, I am supposed to kill my AV and allow BOC to protect me?<br>BS!<br><br>Y'all are missing a very important point here, AVs are now detecting trojans, keyloggers, worms... all kinds of "bad stuff".<br><br>So, what is BOC?<br>It started as an AT, right?<br>Is that all it is now? No!<br>Why?<br><br>Ok, fine!<br><br>Lets look at KAV.<br>With Extended Bases.<br>Is it merely looking for - viruses? No.<br>It's looking for all kinds of nasties, huh?<br>Why?<br><br>Ok, fine!<br><br>Let's look at sheer "numbers" of detected *bad guys*.<br>What is the current count for BOC?<br>278,xxx?<br>Cool!<br><br>Ok, let's look at... AVG/Ewido.<br>745,xxx.<br>Hmmm...<br><br>What sets BOC apart from *ANY* other resident?<br>All y'alls claims? That's not enough for some of us!<br><br>Is it better than... TH Guard?<br>The Cleaner?<br>a-squared?<br>AVG/Ewido?<br>{Insert Resident Here}________________?<br><br>If yes, how?<br>What makes BOC so superior?<br><br>REAL explanation please, no BS spin job.<br><SMALL>--<br>Think outside the Fox... <A HREF="http://www.opera.com/">Opera</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18215503</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 14:16:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18215447</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/655093"><b>Name Game</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  dadkins <A HREF="/useremail/u/879997"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>Thanks Again Name Game!<br><br>You see, all the BS about BOC and NetBus... well, I DID have a hell of a time with NetBus making it here for me to test.<br>That Damned AV I have running, huh?<br><br>;)<br> </DIV>No wonder Comcast is having so much trouble..you are stacking up all those NetBus electrons on the big pipe and slowing the whole shebang for the rest of the customers..don't deny it now..you cant convince me otherwise. :o<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.boston.com/business/personaltech/articles/2007/03/12/not_so_fast_broadband_providers_tell_big_users/" >www.boston.com/business/personal&middot;&middot;&middot;g_users/</A><br><SMALL>--<br>Gladiator Security Forum  &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.gladiator-antivirus.com/" >www.gladiator-antivirus.com/</A> Missing Kids &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.missingkids.com/" >www.missingkids.com/</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18215447</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 14:05:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18215419</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/879997"><b>dadkins</b></A> : Thanks Again Name Game!<br><br>You see, all the BS about BOC and NetBus... well, I DID have a hell of a time with NetBus making it here for me to test.<br>That Damned AV I have running, huh?<br><br>;)<br><SMALL>--<br>Think outside the Fox... <A HREF="http://www.opera.com/">Opera</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18215419</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 13:58:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18215403</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/332558"><b>Ryan</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  dadkins <A HREF="/useremail/u/879997"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>Yes friend!<br>I know how BOC (is supposed to) work.<br><br>NO ONE, for any reason gets me to kill my AV. LOL!<br><br>My point is, having BOC sitting there doing - nothing, is a waste!<br>It is!<br><br>I have read MANY posts here at DSLR about BOC pouncing on whatever and saving someone from certain disaster.<br><br>Ok, cool!<br>Well, something must be wrong from the start if BOC ever gets to *SEE* the malware.<br>That means, something FAILED in preventing the malware form getting on the machine.<br>BOC only sees something if it is running in memory, right?<br><br>Who dropped the ball and allowed ??? on the machine?<br><br>No amount of me clicking on every freakin link I see has made BOC do - anything! <br><br>No!<br>My machine(s) are NOT locked down!<br>I do NOT have stuff disabled - ANY of it!<br>I run as Administrator at all times.<br>I have ALWAYS ran as Administrator.<br><br>Can anyone here explain how I(and many others) have ran this way for years without BOC and no infections?<br><br>Naw, didn't think ya could...  :uhh:<br> </DIV>Dadkins it completely depends on your browsing habits. Many users tend to get infected from social networking sites and p2p software which have constantly updated threats which can sometimes slip by your av. The whole point is that you have that extra layer of protection for when it does slip by it. No AV is 100% especially with detecting trojans. I agree with you that you dont need boclean or any AT, and I dont personally need it either, but peoples whose browsing habits are not up to par do need it especially with all the variants and packers/creators. Also how do you expect to test boclean without disabling your av maybe on a test machine or at least without getting the latest trojans of warez or p2p or social networking sites.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18215403</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 13:56:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18215392</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/655093"><b>Name Game</b></A> : How on earth did you even get a file like leaktest or Netbus even downloaded to yer PC...why your Suite or AVAST must have stopped it dead in it tracks before the first 2 bits hit your sandboxie.. :D :D and then swept it out the door of your router. Keep that up and your IPS will come after you for backing up the big pipes and charge you for a plumber. ;)<br><SMALL>--<br>Gladiator Security Forum  &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.gladiator-antivirus.com/" >www.gladiator-antivirus.com/</A> <br>Missing Kids<br> &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.missingkids.com/" >www.missingkids.com/</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18215392</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 13:53:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18215346</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/879997"><b>dadkins</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Name Game <A HREF="/useremail/u/655093"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br> :D :D :D you sure do have fun <br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.outpostfirewall.com/forum/showthread.php?s=99f10cd4104c9f8d28eff4a5957e01af&t=20173" >www.outpostfirewall.com/forum/sh&middot;&middot;&middot;&t=20173</A><br> </DIV>Right! <br>Thank you Name Game!<br><br>I like my Agnitum Outpost Firewall PRO!<br>I tried Agnitum's new baby, Outpost Security Suite PRO...<br><br>It Sucked Ass!<br>I had NO PROBLEM telling them that it sucked!<br>REMEMBER, this is a company that I like!<br><br>Something about "Keepin it Real" comes to mind, huh?<br><br>Y'all should try things from other points of view from time to time... it's really enlightening!  ;)<br><br>YMMV.<br><SMALL>--<br>Think outside the Fox... <A HREF="http://www.opera.com/">Opera</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18215346</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 13:41:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18215316</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/655093"><b>Name Game</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  dadkins <A HREF="/useremail/u/879997"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>Yes friend!<br>I know how BOC (is supposed to) work.<br><br>NO ONE, for any reason gets me to kill my AV. LOL!<br><br>My point is, having BOC sitting there doing - nothing, is a waste!<br>It is!<br><br>I have read MANY posts here at DSLR about BOC pouncing on whatever and saving someone from certain disaster.<br><br>Ok, cool!<br>Well, something must be wrong from the start if BOC ever gets to *SEE* the malware.<br>That means, something FAILED in preventing the malware form getting on the machine.<br>BOC only sees something if it is running in memory, right?<br><br>Who dropped the ball and allowed ??? on the machine?<br><br>No amount of me clicking on every freakin link I see has made BOC do - anything! <br><br>No!<br>My machine(s) are NOT locked down!<br>I do NOT have stuff disabled - ANY of it!<br>I run as Administrator at all times.<br>I have ALWAYS ran as Administrator.<br><br>Can anyone here explain how I(and many others) have ran this way for years without BOC and no infections?<br><br>Naw, didn't think ya could...  :uhh:<br> </DIV> :D :D :D you sure do have fun <br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.outpostfirewall.com/forum/showthread.php?s=99f10cd4104c9f8d28eff4a5957e01af&t=20173" >www.outpostfirewall.com/forum/sh&middot;&middot;&middot;&t=20173</A><br><SMALL>--<br>Gladiator Security Forum  &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.gladiator-antivirus.com/" >www.gladiator-antivirus.com/</A> Missing Kids &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.missingkids.com/" >www.missingkids.com/</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18215316</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 13:35:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18215297</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/879997"><b>dadkins</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by Iwannabeanerd :</SMALL><br><br>Thanx i'll check it out later. I need to go do some house chores  :( mow the lawn, fix a bathroom leak, clean the a/c evaporator and condenser, etc. :(<br> </DIV>This what *I* see whan I drag Leak Test to "it".<br>NOTE: This BOC did not detect Leak Test when it was ran.<br><br>Yeah! I have it! I get off on trying & testing software!<br>All kinds of software.<br>From any producer.<br><br>BTW, this one uses 13+MB now.  :hmm:<br>4.22 used 10MB. <br>New and Improved?<br><SMALL>--<br>Think outside the Fox... <A HREF="http://www.opera.com/">Opera</A></SMALL><div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/18215297?c=1155214&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IxODIxNDAwMS54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="1036589 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=375 SRC="/r0/download/1155214.thumb600~54db869dfa5ae3addaf7afe7eb0e7fa0/LT.jpg/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A></TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18215297</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 13:32:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18215267</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/879997"><b>dadkins</b></A> : Yes friend!<br>I know how BOC (is supposed to) work.<br><br>NO ONE, for any reason gets me to kill my AV. LOL!<br><br>My point is, having BOC sitting there doing - nothing, is a waste!<br>It is!<br><br>I have read MANY posts here at DSLR about BOC pouncing on whatever and saving someone from certain disaster.<br><br>Ok, cool!<br>Well, something must be wrong from the start if BOC ever gets to *SEE* the malware.<br>That means, something FAILED in preventing the malware form getting on the machine.<br>BOC only sees something if it is running in memory, right?<br><br>Who dropped the ball and allowed ??? on the machine?<br><br>No amount of me clicking on every freakin link I see has made BOC do - anything! <br><br>No!<br>My machine(s) are NOT locked down!<br>I do NOT have stuff disabled - ANY of it!<br>I run as Administrator at all times.<br>I have ALWAYS ran as Administrator.<br><br>Can anyone here explain how I(and many others) have ran this way for years without BOC and no infections?<br><br>Naw, didn't think ya could...  :uhh:<br><SMALL>--<br>Think outside the Fox... <A HREF="http://www.opera.com/">Opera</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18215267</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 13:24:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18215237</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Dadkins has no idea how Boc works. What did you say. You went surfing to bad places with others security in place including Boc. You said boc didn't do shit. Well boc detects when the malware is in memory. Your AV would see the malware first cos it file scans and detects the malware BEFORE it gets to memory. You would have needed to switch off all your other security apps to see what boc can do. But then again you don't know how it works, so how you profess to know HOW to test it is beyond. Oh and i used to be a regular poster here and you were a cool guy. Times change...<br><br>M.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18215237</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 13:12:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18215226</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Thanx i'll check it out later. I need to go do some house chores  :( mow the lawn, fix a bathroom leak, clean the a/c evaporator and condenser, etc. :(]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18215226</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 13:09:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18215163</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/879997"><b>dadkins</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Name Game <A HREF="/useremail/u/655093"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>Dadkins is the expert  <br> </DIV>NO! I have never professed to be an expert!<br><br>I am a realist!<br>Gold is Gold, Crap is Crap.<br><br>Don't care who made what, it is what it is! No amount of spin will change this! LOL!<br><br>See, THAT'S what I am talking about!<br>If ya can't dazzle 'em with brilliance...  :huh:<br><SMALL>--<br>Think outside the Fox... <A HREF="http://www.opera.com/">Opera</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18215163</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 12:54:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18215144</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/655093"><b>Name Game</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by Iwannabeanerd :</SMALL><br><br>Ye, I closed boclean via the menu and didn't want to uninstall from add/and remove programs. I removed it from the programs menu...<br><br>start=>programs=>comodo=>comodo boclean=>uninstall comodo boclean.<br><br>After uninstalling from the programs menu boclean stays in the add/remove programs list, it goes away after a reboot. This doesn't bother me i'm just putting it here for reference to others or if someone would like to pass the word to comodo, whatever.<br><br>What I'm really interested in is how to test boclean. I'm use to programs give me pop ups, movement, anything that tells me it's working. It just sitting there :D<br> </DIV>Dadkins is the expert  ;) I would not test it unless a setup is available for one station to infect another.<br><br>I would imagine some labs will now take a crack at it.<br><SMALL>--<br>Gladiator Security Forum  &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.gladiator-antivirus.com/" >www.gladiator-antivirus.com/</A> Missing Kids &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.missingkids.com/" >www.missingkids.com/</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18215144</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 12:49:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18215132</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/879997"><b>dadkins</b></A> : Try this... QUITE safe!<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.grc.com/lt/leaktest.htm" >www.grc.com/lt/leaktest.htm</A><br><br>EDIT: It's a firewall Leak Test. Harmless!<br><br>EDIT2: It appears that COMODO/Kevin removed the FP of detecting that leaktest when ran.<br><br>If you drag that leaktest to the "New" BOC, it gets flagged as bad.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18215132</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 12:47:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18215130</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/332558"><b>Ryan</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by Iwannabeanerd :</SMALL><BR><BR>What I'm really interested in is how to test boclean. I'm use to programs give me pop ups, movement, anything that tells me it's working. It just sitting there :D<br> </DIV>Yes thats its job. Its silent until an infection tries to load in memory. I dont suggest trying to test it unless you have knowledge of malware or at least a complete image of your computer that you can go back to. A great way to test is p2p  ;) They seem to have the latest trojan variants.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18215130</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 12:47:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18215108</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Ye, I closed boclean via the menu and didn't want to uninstall from add/and remove programs. I removed it from the programs menu...<br><br>start=>programs=>comodo=>comodo boclean=>uninstall comodo boclean.<br><br>After uninstalling from the programs menu boclean stays in the add/remove programs list, it goes away after a reboot. This doesn't bother me i'm just putting it here for reference to others or if someone would like to pass the word to comodo, whatever.<br><br>What I'm really interested in is how to test boclean. I'm use to programs give me pop ups, movement, anything that tells me it's working. It just sitting there :D]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18215108</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 12:41:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18215040</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/879997"><b>dadkins</b></A> : I have asked Kevin and all the BOC evangelists questions about BOC and all I have ever gotten is BS.<br><br>All I want is some answers.<br><br>Everyone skates the issues I raise. Is that MY fault?<br><br>"signature-based mentality" - ok, someone tell me, what is included with BOC updates?<br>Why do the numbers of detected things go up?<br>Aren't those - signatures?<br><br>Uh huh...<br><br>BS!<br><br>No trial... WHY?<br>Now it's free, but why wasn't there EVER a trial? Right!<br><br>NO ONE has ever given me a straight answer.<br>Well, now look!<br>BOC was doing SO well, Kevin had to "sell out" to COMODO. Gee, wonder why?<br><br>No one drinking the KoolAid fast enough to keep food on the table?  :o<br><br>No, I have the "Guy In Charge" try to insult me... LMAO!<br>Kinda failed, didn't it!  ;)<br><br>Yeah, y'all can keep on slinging it, *I HAVE THE MF!*<br>NO ONE here can BS me any longer!<br>I can see WTF it does or does NOT do myself!<br>Never could before... scared much?<br><br>Sorr if YOU don't like Outpost. <br>As a Firewall, Outpost is about as good as you are going to get!<br><br>Agnitum's OSSP, well, it SUCKED!<br>I had NO PROBLEM telling them it sucked!<br><br>Ok, now back to BOC... guess what!<br>I have it, I ran it, it sucked!<br><br>Y'all can stop now! LOL!<br>Perhaps YOU(whomever) needs it to protect you from ??? - sorry!<br><br>*IF* I wanted a resident AT, I have a couple. <br>Bigger teeth & lighter on resources - no matter what any of you wish to try and feed *US*.<br><br>@ NG,<br> I thought BOC was supposed to COMPLIMENT an AV...<br>BOC aint what you think(or have been brainwashed into thinking) it is! LOL!<br><br>Y'all are funny!<br>I'm here because I speak my mind!<br>I am also here to give a second look at this subject.<br>...from a realistic viewpoint.<br><br>Back when BOC was dropped, it was the shit!<br><br>Today, not so much. No matter what any of you have to say about it! Sorry! <br><br>EDIT:<br>Hey! Where the hell is Nancy? <br>Something happen that I didn't hear about? <br><SMALL>--<br>Think outside the Fox... <A HREF="http://www.opera.com/">Opera</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18215040</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 12:26:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18215019</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/655093"><b>Name Game</b></A> : You can't uninstall from add/remove if it is still running.<br><br>Also this link will still help users to set it up and understand it's features.<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.nsclean.com/supboc.html" >www.nsclean.com/supboc.html</A><br><br>1f you're REPLACING an existing version of BOClean, then you'll want to first doubleclick the traybar icon and click "Shutdown BOClean" on the button menu which appears. Then UNINSTALL the earlier BOClean from the BOClean program group on the start menu, or from the Windows control panel's "add/remove programs." BOClean should appear on the list. If your previous BOClean cannot be uninstalled, then go ahead and install the 4.22 version, then UNINSTALL it, and then finally install it again. This will remove all prior traces of your old BOClean and install the new one "squeaky clean." ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18215019</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 12:21:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18215005</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Hi boclean users i'm trying boclean for the first time since I heard it's good. I experienced this problem when uninstalling from add/remove programs on a win2k box([an error occured while trying to remove boclean. it may have already been uninstalled. would you like to remove boclean from the add/remove program list?] look at screenshot). Uninstalling from the programs menu works so i'm just putting it out there, its no biggie, it doesn't bother me since i don't remove programs from there anyway.<br><br>Aside from that, how can i test boclean if it's working? I tried leaktest from grc and it blocked it, but this a firewall leak test tool. I tried to start other programs that required internet access and I didn't get no pop up from boclean. <br><br>regards<div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/18215005?c=1155192&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IxODIxNDAwMS54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="53021 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=449 SRC="/r0/download/1155192.thumb600~9c4da3a734dec00ca5c981153aef067d/boclean.JPG/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A></TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18215005</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 12:17:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18214975</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/655093"><b>Name Game</b></A> : BOclean failed to remove it because KAV tried to jump on it it first.. did a bad job of stopping it and two of the vectors of the package sent..and when the user tried to do that <B>system restore</B>..and brought back into play two files BOClean still disabled..but I would not expect it to clean that PC at that point..it's too late.<br><br>I have run that badboy "package" against a system with NO AV..and BOClean would not even let it load and there was no infected winlogon or other files of the OS.<br><br>When you see KAV popup on one of those and tell you you are still infected.. or even attempt to disable it..let me know<br><SMALL>--<br>Gladiator Security Forum  &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.gladiator-antivirus.com/" >www.gladiator-antivirus.com/</A> Missing Kids &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.missingkids.com/" >www.missingkids.com/</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18214975</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 12:11:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18214953</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/332558"><b>Ryan</b></A> : Dadkins i dont understand why you have such a grudge to boclean. I completely understand why you dont need it, but for me its going to make my life easier.. Why you ask, well dont you have family or friends who always seem to get trojans no matter what antivirus they use. I know I do.. Every other week im having to clean their computers from some trojan off of myspace or some email attachment they opened even though I told them not to. This just offers one more layer of protection. It doesnt touch resources and now that its free there is no reason not to install it. <br><br>I understand why you wouldnt need it. Personally I could probably even go without virus protection, but there are people out there who are not computer SAVY such as yourself.<br><br>You seem to have an unreasonable hatred towards boclean and I cant understand why. Its software each person has their own opinion towards things. You said you use Outpost I <B>hate</B> outpost, but I don't go to every outpost topic and talk about how I think it sucks. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18214953</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 12:04:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18214925</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/429050"><b>La Luna</b></A> : Here's some tips for installing from Kevin, via the Comodo forum:<br><br><I>For anyone replacing their earlier BOClean, some RULES which need to be followed as far as installing the new version, however since I have no idea of when the support center or the documentation pages are going to be there ... this is all I can offer ...<br><br>#1. If you already have a copy of any earlier BOClean on your machine, UNINSTALL it first! If you have BOClean running on the traybar, right click it, select "shut down BOClean" and that will make it go away. Should you forget to do this, the remover will complain and tell you to do so. There is no harm done if the old BOClean were to be left running, however you'll have two BOCleans running and that will waste resources. The two will not interfere with one another, but you only require one. <br><br>#2. In order to properly install the COMODO BOClean 4.23 onto a Vista machine, you *MUST* right click on the downloaded setup programme and select "Run as administrator" to install it properly. For XP and earlier, being administrator/owner is sufficient. A reminder screen will appear when started to warn that it must be installed under the administrator/owner account but people don't read what's right in front of their face. It's NECESSARY to ensure that the kernel driver is properly loaded that the installation be done by administrator and under VISTA, it must be done under "Run AS" ...<br><br>#3. Once installed, BOClean will NOT reboot the machine - this is done in order to protect any "works in progress" on the user's machine from accidental loss. However, the kernel driver once installed MUST start at bootup and without a bootup to kick it off, it will not be present until the machine has been rebooted "at your earliest convenience." BOClean will also start automatically after a reboot, it is NOT started by the installer based upon the need for its kernel driver to be present. This is the reason for the reboot requirement rather than just starting BOClean straight away.<br><br>Finally, I'm not sure if there's updates for 4.23 being put on the COMODO server - the NSClean site is NOT updating BOClean 4.23 at all ... just 4.22. So please bear with us, I've suddenly become overloaded myself.</I><br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://forums.comodo.com/index.php?PHPSESSID=3f93fceccc3aee5a06d13d7adf4b99dc&topic=7641.165" >forums.comodo.com/index.php?PHPS&middot;&middot;&middot;7641.165</A><br><SMALL>--<br>~~"As long as America is an infidel enemy, terrorizing it is a duty." Sayed Imam Abdul-Aziz el-Sheriff~~<br><br></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18214925</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 11:57:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18214902</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/879997"><b>dadkins</b></A> : If he shut BOC down, how was BOC reporting BYXYAAX.DLL?<br><br>It WAS running, and BOC failed to remove it!<br><br>Read this one more time NG:<br><br>"BOClean keeps reporting BYXYAAX.DLL . it disables it but if i try to remove it BOC shuts down."<br><br>Uhm, yeah!<br>Reread that whole thread!<br>CJ got him cleaned up. NOT BOC!<br><br>NetBus, reread that whole fiasco, please?<br>The whole thing about NetBus was Kevin professing some BS about leagalese keeping NetBus detection enabled was to keep BOC as a "club".<br>Well, that didn't fly!<br>EVERYONE detects NetBus, and they aren't a "club".<br><br>Do you agree with this line:<br><br>"No offense intended here, but it's always been amazing how low the bar has been for so-called "security experts" in forums."<br><br>Or, do you realize this response is true:<br><br>Yep! Sure is! <br><br>Good thing I have *NEVER* even eluded to be an expert on security!<br><br>Now, answer me friend...<br><br><B>Why have I, and many other people, done fine without the Almighty BOC?</B><br><br><SMALL>--<br>Think outside the Fox... <A HREF="http://www.opera.com/">Opera</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18214902</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 11:49:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18214876</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/655093"><b>Name Game</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  dadkins <A HREF="/useremail/u/879997"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>Uhm NG... read the first line in that thread:<br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/remark,18199654">HJT-   BYXYAAX.DLL & MORE</A><br><br>"BOClean keeps reporting BYXYAAX.DLL . it disables it but if i try to remove it BOC shuts down."<br><br>BOC FAILED! More than once!<br>BOC was actually killed!<br><br>BOC aint all that!<br><br>There is no Silver Bullet. Not even BOC!<br> </DIV>Actually he shut it {BOClean) down long ago..and that is why it got through to the system even with KAV which was running and missed it..you just got in on the tail end of how it all came down in the cleanup thread.<br><br>but you can always just try to keep on figuring out with netbus..what is the infecter or the infectee  :D<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/remark,18111936">Re: Comodo acquires BOClean</A><br><br>and when you are all done talking keep.. on telling people your solutions.<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/remark,18167905">Re: Once a Rootkit infects your pc. What's the security risk ?</A><br><SMALL>--<br>Gladiator Security Forum  &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.gladiator-antivirus.com/" >www.gladiator-antivirus.com/</A> Missing Kids &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.missingkids.com/" >www.missingkids.com/</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18214876</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 11:43:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18214869</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/879997"><b>dadkins</b></A> : No, actually!<br>You?<br><br>Like I have posted... I LIKE OUTPOST PRO!!!<br><br>Agnitum let me try OSSP. It sucked!<br>I told them it sucked!<br>Because... it DID suck!<br>Read it for yourself - EVERYONE!<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.outpostfirewall.com/forum/showthread.php?t=20173" >www.outpostfirewall.com/forum/sh&middot;&middot;&middot;?t=20173</A><br><br>I hate to tell you this friend, BOC sucks!<br>I know!<br>I have a copy!<br>A copy of the one y'all paid for!<br><br>Y'all got burned!<br>Ya got burned and most of ya facilitated others to get burned.<br><br>Well, not anymore! IT'S FREE!<br>People can NOW try it and see for themselves if it lives up to all the hype!<br><br>The BSing can now stop!<br><SMALL>--<br>Think outside the Fox... <A HREF="http://www.opera.com/">Opera</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18214869</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 11:41:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18214835</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/879997"><b>dadkins</b></A> : Uhm NG... read the first line in that thread:<br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/remark,18199654">HJT-   BYXYAAX.DLL & MORE</A><br><br>"BOClean keeps reporting BYXYAAX.DLL . it disables it but if i try to remove it BOC shuts down."<br><br>BOC FAILED! More than once!<br>BOC was actually killed!<br><br>BOC aint all that!<br><br>There is no Silver Bullet. Not even BOC!<br><SMALL>--<br>Think outside the Fox... <A HREF="http://www.opera.com/">Opera</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18214835</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 11:31:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18214826</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/761551"><b>sharpy merc</b></A> : Hey dadkins here's a what if question for ya.<br><br>What if SONY had brought BOClean?<br><br>Would your head explode?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18214826</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 11:28:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18214815</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/879997"><b>dadkins</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  CajunTek <A HREF="/useremail/u/855835"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>Here we are disagreeing.... ;)  <br><br>But I think you need it.. and more.. (a lot of common sense too)<br><br>For example this guy had KAV and BOClean (now I don't know what his KAV settings were but..) <br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/remark,18199654">HJT-   BYXYAAX.DLL & MORE</A><br> </DIV>He had KAV *AND* BOC?<br>...and still got owned?<br><br>But, but, but... didn't BOC save his bacon?<br>If one were to believe HALF of the postings here, BOC should have flown to the rescue!  :huh: <br><SMALL>--<br>Think outside the Fox... <A HREF="http://www.opera.com/">Opera</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18214815</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 11:25:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18214756</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/655093"><b>Name Game</b></A> : And here is another user..who was running Norton and got whacked..and could not be helped..but someone told her KAV would do the trick if she installed it..<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://gladiator-antivirus.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=53418&hl=" >gladiator-antivirus.com/forum/in&middot;&middot;&middot;3418&hl=</A><br>as you see she is now doing the reformat reinstall.<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://gladiator-antivirus.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=53628" >gladiator-antivirus.com/forum/in&middot;&middot;&middot;ic=53628</A><br><br>My point to everyone is this...their are so many nasty versions of Vundo and a few other badboys out there..<br><br><B>just look at this line up of people</B><br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/cleanup">Security Cleanup</A><br><br>The AV Suites can not keep up with all of them..and BOClean is going to give you one more chance to save your data and protect it.<br><SMALL>--<br>Gladiator Security Forum  &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.gladiator-antivirus.com/" >www.gladiator-antivirus.com/</A> Missing Kids &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.missingkids.com/" >www.missingkids.com/</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18214756</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 11:08:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18214753</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/879997"><b>dadkins</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  CajunTek <A HREF="/useremail/u/855835"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>Here we are disagreeing.... ;)  <br><br>But I think you need it.. and more.. (a lot of common sense too)<br><br>For example this guy had KAV and BOClean (now I don't know what his KAV settings were but..) <br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/remark,18199654">HJT-   BYXYAAX.DLL & MORE</A><br> </DIV>...and here I sit, for YEARS, never having BOC - and not one problem.<br><br>How many HJT logs have I posted? 0.<br>How many "I'm hosed" threads have I started? 0.<br><br>I go anywhere and click anything.<br>I DO NOT use BOC!<br>No infections... *ANYONE* care to try and explain how?<br><br>I didn't have BOC...<br>At various times, I have had Trend Micro, KAV, and avast.<br><br><B>NO BOClean</B> - and nothing ever happened. <br><br>Recently, someone(a friend) sent me a copy of the original 4.22 BOC.<br>I installed it.<br>It sat there. <br>It consumed 10MB(not worried about RAM, but WTF?)<br><br>It detected Gibson's Leak Test... OOOoooo!!!!<br>Considering that Gibson's Leak Test is harmless, Wow! I'm impressed!  :hmm:<br><br>I took it for a spin in the Adult Arena of the web... seen my AV have a hissyfit a bunch of times!<br>Trojans, codecs, javascripts, IST... a few items.<br><br>BOC didn't do shit!<br><br>Scanned that test laptop with a SHITLOAD of scanners afterwards.<br>AVs, ATs, ASs, Rootkit scanners(All of them)... <br><br>Guess what!!!<br><br>Not a damn thing was found besides - cookies! BFD! LMAO!<br><br>Now, I ask this ONE MORE TIME: <br><br>What do I need BOClean for?<br><br>Even though it is Free - NOW, *I* still don't see a pressing need for it.<br><br>As always, YMMV.<br><br>I suggest to everyone, get it(IT'S FREE)!<br>Use it on your machines!<br><br>If it is useful, Great!<br>If it is not, also Great!<br><br>All the turfing that has been done about the Almighty BOC, sure was a BIG letdown when I actually got a copy! <br><SMALL>--<br>Think outside the Fox... <A HREF="http://www.opera.com/">Opera</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18214753</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 11:07:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18214751</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/879997"><b>dadkins</b></A> : Board hiccup. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18214751</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 11:06:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18214695</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/332558"><b>Ryan</b></A> : IMHO boclean offers a great <B>second</B> defense. If all else fails its good to have an extra layer of detection. IMHO if your using kaspersky its probably overkill due to there great trojan detection, however me a nod32 fan they have been known to sometimes miss a few trojans which is where boclean comes in. Trojan is ran nod32 misses it, loads into memory boclean picks up the new variant and stops it before it can do harm. Its not like the program is a killer on resources and now that its free there is no reason not to use it. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18214695</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 10:51:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18214689</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/655093"><b>Name Game</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  jmorlan <A HREF="/useremail/u/305506"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>Okay.  I downloaded and installed it.  It appears to offer real-time protection against Trojan infections, but without file scanning ability.  Is that right, or am I missing something?<br><br>Do I need this when I already have Active Virus Shield (Kaspersky free) running in real time?  <br> </DIV>You sure do need it..and do not turn BOClean off then like this user did..who also has KAV running and in real time..<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/remark,18197951">BOClean vs. PMNOLJH</A><br><br>or you will end up here asking for help  :(<br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/remark,18199654">HJT-   BYXYAAX.DLL & MORE</A><br><br>and if you still think KAV is going to do it all..<br><br>just ask the experts..fcukdat for one<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/remark,18194731~days=9999">Murlo trojan</A><br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/remark,18209944">Re: Murlo trojan</A><br><br>where some of those rootkits are still making the rounds and KAV can not even do the full repair to this date.<br><br><SMALL>--<br>Gladiator Security Forum  &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.gladiator-antivirus.com/" >www.gladiator-antivirus.com/</A> <br>Missing Kids<br> &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.missingkids.com/" >www.missingkids.com/</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18214689</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 10:49:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18214674</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/855835"><b>CajunTek</b></A> : Here we are disagreeing.... ;)  <br><br>But I think you need it.. and more.. (a lot of common sense too)<br><br>For example this guy had KAV and BOClean (now I don't know what his KAV settings were but..) <br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/remark,18199654">HJT-   BYXYAAX.DLL & MORE</A><br><SMALL>--<br>da Cajun  Darn I hate Malware</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18214674</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 10:45:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18214649</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/879997"><b>dadkins</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  jmorlan <A HREF="/useremail/u/305506"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>Okay.  I downloaded and installed it.  It appears to offer real-time protection against Trojan infections, but without file scanning ability.  Is that right, or am I missing something?<br><br>Do I need this when I already have Active Virus Shield (Kaspersky free) running in real time?  <br> </DIV>Actually, no.<br><br>Way back when AVs only looked for viruses, yeah!<br>A resident AT would have been a good idea.<br><br>Now that nearly any "scanner"(Real Time and On Demand both) scans for all kinds of malware, trojans included, ya really don't need a secondary AT resident - from ANYONE!<br><br>Since BOC is free now, go ahead and get it and YOU decide whether or not it is needed.<br><br>Don't listen to the hype - FROM ANYONE!  :huh:<br><br><B>You Make The Call!</B><br><SMALL>--<br>Think outside the Fox... <A HREF="http://www.opera.com/">Opera</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18214649</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 10:37:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18214629</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/855835"><b>CajunTek</b></A> : yes....]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18214629</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 10:30:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18214577</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/305506"><b>jmorlan</b></A> : Okay.  I downloaded and installed it.  It appears to offer real-time protection against Trojan infections, but without file scanning ability.  Is that right, or am I missing something?<br><br>Do I need this when I already have Active Virus Shield (Kaspersky free) running in real time?  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18214577</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 10:15:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18214534</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/959828"><b>gugarci</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Cudni <A HREF="/useremail/u/917630"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>it is out ;)<br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/remark,18213594">Shh, Don't tell Anybody...</A><br><br>Cudni<br> </DIV>Thanks, got it. Will install later. :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18214534</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 09:57:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18214082</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1247859"><b>greenhatch</b></A> : I was flabbergasted to see the Comodo chief post a link to the new Comodo BOClean before the official launch (and essential release notes!). If on XP, 4.22 owners do not need to upgrade to 4.23 just yet. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18214082</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 04:20:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18214066</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1382122"><b>balloonshark</b></A> : Since it's out, please read Kevins posts on pages 12 and 13 about previous installations and Windows Vista.<br><SMALL>--<br>If we quit voting, will they all just go away?</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18214066</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 04:03:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18214063</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/917630"><b>Cudni</b></A> : it is out ;)<br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/remark,18213594">Shh, Don't tell Anybody...</A><br><br>Cudni]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18214063</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 03:59:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18214001</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1159554"><b>norwegian</b></A> : LOL.<br><br>Don't get Dadkins started eh.  ;)<br><br>As for BOClean, what the "fabled version 5" is about, I no doubt it will be a lot better a product, and look forward to seeing research, rather than detection and repair, which already has been noted in that last thread. There Dadkins, we do listen. <br><br>I wonder what it will be capable of, coupled with Comodo firewall. Will look forward to that for a test. <br><br>Edit: spelling<br><SMALL>--<br>The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing - Edmund Burke</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18214001</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 03:12:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18213979</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/855835"><b>CajunTek</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  dadkins <A HREF="/useremail/u/879997"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>Nevermind<br> </DIV>Come on dakins, tell us what you really think.. ;)  :D :p<br><br>At least here.. we can disagree civilly (unlike some places...)<br><SMALL>--<br>da Cajun  Darn I hate Malware</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18213979</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 02:55:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18213920</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/879997"><b>dadkins</b></A> : Nevermind]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18213920</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 02:24:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18213778</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/855835"><b>CajunTek</b></A> : Visit the comodo forums for late breaking news.. (especially the <B>available soon...</B> thread..  :D<br><SMALL>--<br>da Cajun <br><br> Darn I hate Malware</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18213778</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 01:39:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18179985</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/959828"><b>gugarci</b></A> : I can't wait. I didn't know that Comodo BoClean was going to be free.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18179985</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 12:32:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Latest Comodo BoClean Information</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18179500</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1209480"><b>MADx</b></A> : This is taken from the Comodo BoClean forum it is the latest information on what to expect in the days to come. Also here is a link with information concerning existing customer and Comodo BoClean 4.23. &raquo;<A HREF="http://forums.comodo.com/index.php/topic,7806.msg56714.html#msg56714" >forums.comodo.com/index.php/topi&middot;&middot;&middot;msg56714</A>  <br><br>Kevin McAleavey -<br><br>COMODO BOClean 4.23 (note the extremely minor version number change) will be the SAME as BOClean 4.22 for now ... the only major changes are some nice graphics on it that say COMODO of course, and the solution for VISTA compatibility that worked just fine in 4.22 until Vista was actually released. Microsoft made some changes in how kernel drivers are handled and even though ours wasn't a HARDWARE driver in the traditional sense, they required not only "signed code" but also a special "CROSS-certificate" from Microsoft in addition to the "signed code." While I was still with Privacy Software Corp, we requested this from them back in December of last year and never got it. Now that we're in COMODO's hands, the logjam was broken and the certificates JUST arrived this past week. THAT was the major part of the delay. Once the code has been signed, then we have to go back and retest all of the 4.23 release to ensure that everything works properly as there have been quite a few reports of strange things happening with signed kernel code. Since it's always been our tradition to avoid tossing coded corpses out of speeding cars in the dead of night, need a few more days to beat up things in our own labs to ensure it will work as reliably as its predecessor yet be happy under Vista.<br><br> And no, not handing out "release candidates" at this point either ... but the 4.23 release, aside from the above, will be the SAME as 4.22 was. Once that's out the door, next step is to take the existing code which is written in Borland C and then port it to Microsoft C (Microsoft's C isn't completely ANSI compatible whereas Borland was) so that my teammates at COMODO can get under the hood along with me and start making some SERIOUS improvements to it which will hopefully lead us to either a 4.30 or better yet that fabled 5.0 release as soon as is practical. Over the past two years, I've started to do a number of amazing things that I never had the time to FINISH. I think those unfinished things excited Melih even more than BOClean or any of our other existing stuff. Hopefully now that I have analysts and no longer have to do the malware, this will all come together sooner rather than later. There's a lot of work ahead to be done and it's great to finally have the opportunity to DO some of it again! ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18179500</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 10:55:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
