<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>MuniX? FAILURE in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r18224756</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 22:19:11 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 22:19:11 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>MuniX? FAILURE</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18224756</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1099325"><b>Ahrenl</b></A> : It's a failure because it can't meet demand! If this were a larger carrier like TWC they'd have no problem! {wait..} <br><br>Later they'll be a failure because they're not growing at breakneck speeds anymore. <br><br>Finally they'll be a failure just because AT&T says so.. <br><br>I'll also add an obligatory, "I can't BELIEVE they're spending the poor taxpayers money on this project!?!?! OMFG!"<br><br>On a serious note, congrats to them. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18224756</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 09:21:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
