<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Liability for Fake/Incorrect DMCA Notices in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r18224825</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 12:00:28 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 12:00:28 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Liability for Fake/Incorrect DMCA Notices</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18226167</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/753545"><b>manfmmd</b></A> : Fraud.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18226167</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:03:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Liability for Fake/Incorrect DMCA Notices</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18225109</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/625141"><b>pnh102</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Mac Bridger <A HREF="/useremail/u/284213"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>For what?<br><br>I'm not against the idea, but I can't think of a single criminal charge that would stick.  Google could of course sue them. </DIV>I would think in the case of a fake DMCA notice, that is, someone claiming to be a copyright owner but really isn't, who types up a notice and emails it to Google, would probably be liable for forgery and fraud charges at the very least.  If the person is outside of CA (where Google is based), then Federal charges could also apply.<br><SMALL>--<br>Only SHATNER is Kirk.</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18225109</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:31:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Liability for Fake/Incorrect DMCA Notices</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18225092</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/284213"><b>Mac Bridger</b></A> : For what?<br><br>I'm not against the idea, but I can't think of a single criminal charge that would stick.  Google could of course sue them.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18225092</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:28:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Liability for Fake/Incorrect DMCA Notices</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18224825</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/625141"><b>pnh102</b></A> : Shouldn't those who submit fake or invalid DMCA takedown demand notices be prosecuted?<br><SMALL>--<br>Only SHATNER is Kirk.</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18224825</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 09:35:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
