 JehuPremium
join:2002-09-13
MA
kudos:2 | reply to Goober
Re: RIAA House of Cards Hi, the RIAA works for EMI (as well as others) so EMI releasing some DRM-free music has absolutely nothing to do with the RIAA or if they have a house made of cards.
As has always been, the RIAA is an agent of Recording Industry copyright holders who want to seek legal action against innfringement.
--
The worm he licks my bones |
|
 GlobalMindDomino Dude, POWER Systems GuyPremium
join:2001-10-29
Hollywood, FL | said by Jehu:Hi, the RIAA works for EMI (as well as others) so EMI releasing some DRM-free music has absolutely nothing to do with the RIAA or if they have a house made of cards. As has always been, the RIAA is an agent of Recording Industry copyright holders who want to seek legal action against innfringement. The trouble is they're acting on their own without any oversight. Take the simple case of a C&D letter being sent here recently to websites supporting the new NIN album, which were published with the full knowledge and consent of the band and the label.
These "agents" seem to think that the default position is guilty without any investigation. This isn't about infringement it is about control of distribution channels.
K.
--
TheGlobalMind.com | Speed costs money. How fast do you want to go? | Angus the IT Chap |
|
KearnstdElf WizardPremium
join:2002-01-22
Mullica Hill, NJ | said by GlobalMind:said by Jehu:Hi, the RIAA works for EMI (as well as others) so EMI releasing some DRM-free music has absolutely nothing to do with the RIAA or if they have a house made of cards. As has always been, the RIAA is an agent of Recording Industry copyright holders who want to seek legal action against innfringement. The trouble is they're acting on their own without any oversight. Take the simple case of a C&D letter being sent here recently to websites supporting the new NIN album, which were published with the full knowledge and consent of the band and the label. These "agents" seem to think that the default position is guilty without any investigation. This isn't about infringement it is about control of distribution channels. K. so basicly you mean like how Columbian drug lords want total control of their product from plants to the streets of Brooklyn. or how the Mafia wanted control of the booze from entry to the US to sale at the speakeasy during Prohibition. the difference is the RIAA is legalized gangsters because their product is legal.
--
[65 Arcanist]Filan(High Elf) Zone: Broadband Reports |
|
 GooberPremium
join:2000-12-17
Naperville, IL
kudos:4 | reply to Jehu
I disagree. EMI's actions neuter the RIAA's initiatives to a degree. Think about it, if all the labels were to go DRM fee, a large part of the RIAA's job would evaporate. |
|
|
|
JehuPremium
join:2002-09-13
MA
kudos:2 | reply to Kearnstd
you watch too much tv 
--
The worm he licks my bones |
|
JehuPremium
join:2002-09-13
MA
kudos:2 | reply to Goober
Hi, the RIAA existed long before DRM. DRM-crippled mp3s are but a small part of what they do.
--
The worm he licks my bones |
|
JehuPremium
join:2002-09-13
MA
kudos:2 | reply to GlobalMind
Too much tv for you too. |
|
GooberPremium
join:2000-12-17
Naperville, IL
kudos:4 | reply to Jehu
I realize that. My first dealing with the RIAA was back in 2001 relating to internet music streaming.
But, my point is that the RIAA has become part of the collective conscious because of the DRM issues. When/if the DRM issue is negated by the record companies, a lot of the RIAA's present "business" goes away. |
|
JehuPremium
join:2002-09-13
MA
kudos:2 | I see what you are saying, but I think you need to better parse out what you mean by DRM.
DRM, as a whole, ain't going anywhere. Neverevernever.
Methods of enforcing (read: being a pain in the ass to consumers) DRM will fluctuate and perhaps become quite transparent over time.
EMI's PR brainchild is to sell *some MP3s online with no DRM-crippling stuff built in. yay.
It is a useful PR move, and it's even more useful when, after selling DRM-free MP3s, they can say "see looky we're still getting pirated as much (if not more)."
win-win as they say.
--
The worm he licks my bones |
|
GooberPremium
join:2000-12-17
Naperville, IL
kudos:4 | I can't refute anything you're saying. It will be interesting to see how this plays out. |
|
 FiLPremium
join:2005-08-16
Silver Spring, MD | reply to Jehu
Not really. Take into consideration this:
"This isn't about infringement it is about control of distribution channels."
IMO, this is totally the case. Kind of like how nowadays, people are asking less and less for a Record deal but more and more for a Distribution deal.
Lots of people got in-house studios, they just want the label to flood the market with their music. The RIAA's is definitely not here to "apply the laws of copyright" as can clearer be seen by the CnD letters sent to people recording music off the radio or how they don't want anyone to make any kind of backup they don't see fit. How's that for watching too much tv?  |
|
FiLPremium
join:2005-08-16
Silver Spring, MD | reply to Jehu
Actually, I'd say he's pretty much on the money on that too. lol. Theres no such thing as a black and white issue when dealing with the **AA's. |
|
 nixenRockin' the BoxenPremium
join:2002-10-04
Alexandria, VA | reply to Kearnstd
said by Kearnstd:so basicly you mean like how Columbian drug lords want total control of their product from plants to the streets of Brooklyn. or how the Mafia wanted control of the booze from entry to the US to sale at the speakeasy during Prohibition. the difference is the RIAA is legalized gangsters because their product is legal. Racketeering is racketeering...
--
Everyday, thousands of new cars are delivered to their new owners with poorly-selected radio station presets. |
|
