<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>confused in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r18227830</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 23:18:29 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 23:18:29 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>confused</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18227830</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/669545"><b>hurfy</b></A> : I thought that is how it is supposed to work.<br><br>They swear it is theirs..take it down.<br><br>You swear no it isn't...put it back.<br><br>If they still disagree all hell breaks loose at that point or some such. But no info on what happened at step 2 here. Did viacom still say it was theirs ? or was all the excitement over step 1? am i missing something?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18227830</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 19:44:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
