republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » AT&T's First-Quarter Profit Doubles » i want the bellsouth name back
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« U-verse is crappy  
AuthorAll Replies


morbo
Complete Your Transaction

join:2002-01-22
00000
clubs:
·Charter Pipeline
·AT&T Southwest

reply to DslTrblShoot
Re: i want the bellsouth name back

said by DslTrblShoot See Profile :

You might had a point if the two companies were allowed to collaborate their network systems and the like during the merger approval process. However according to FCC regulations they were not allowed to collaborate, but actually act as competitors. Just like when SBC was buying ATT, they could not collaborate either.
if planning (not implementing) for the transition is "collaboration" then it follows that the commercials for the merger also couldn't have been produced as it would be seen as "collaboration" also. bellsouth PR or marketing must have given their logos to AT&T/SBC in order to make those commercials. or is a double standard (planning ahead in this situation) somehow allowable?


verolom

join:2002-03-23
Eagleville, PA
·Comcast

There is a difference between playing with a company logo, throwing darts at it, or setting it on fire, and doing so in public. Think of it this way, t-shirts with a championship winner are always printed ahead of time for both teams, so they are available immediately after one is announced, but only the t-shirts with the winning team make it to the public. AT&T could be making (having some graphics design company make) commercials about a merger with say Qwest right now even if that is extremely unlikely to happen (as far as you know).

Merging networks and improving service is a whole different proposition both in cost and complexity.


morbo
Complete Your Transaction

join:2002-01-22
00000
clubs:
·Charter Pipeline
·AT&T Southwest

said by verolom See Profile :

Merging networks and improving service is a whole different proposition both in cost and complexity.
point taken. however, AT&T could immediately change the price of BellSouth area dsl offerings to be in line with what MaBell is offering. they don't because?


verolom

join:2002-03-23
Eagleville, PA
I can think of multiple reasons but likely we will agree on one, to make more money.
Forums » AT&T's First-Quarter Profit Doubles« U-verse is crappy  


Sunday, 06-Dec 12:01:46 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [163] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [147] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [134] The Bandwidth Hog Does Not Exist
· [128] Comcast Makes NBC Universal Acquisition Official
· [105] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [101] Google Invades ISP, OpenDNS Turf With Google Public DNS
· [85] FCC Ponders Moving From PSTN To IP Voice
· [82] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [81] New Bill Aims To Limit ETFs
· [75] Sprint Defuses GPS Privacy Media Bomb
Most people now reading
· Wife might have to work in.... Iowa for a few months!!! [General Questions]
· Bulb for garage door opener [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Is there any true cure for, or way to prevent, a hangover? [General Questions]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Problems with rlslog.net? [TekSavvy]
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· IMG 1.7 (IMG Updates and Discussion) [Verizon FIOS TV]
· UPS - What do you people think happened? [General Questions]
· [DNS] Google's public DNS... performance increases? [Comcast HSI]