 CabalPremium
join:2007-01-21
Austin, TX
 ·Suddenlink
| "Because we can't even agree there's a problem" Well, at least I agree with something in these multiple articles. Can someone tell me again why we're expecting companies to roll out services and infrastructure to areas that will never even pay off the cost of that infrastructure in our lifetimes?
--
Interested in open source engine management for your Subaru? |
|
| said by Cabal:Well, at least I agree with something in these multiple articles. Can someone tell me again why we're expecting companies to roll out services and infrastructure to areas that will never even pay off the cost of that infrastructure in our lifetimes? Those who want this BB policy expect the taxpayers to pay for broadband to every little rural whistle stop and farmhouse, and damn the cost. In other words, become more of a socialist country than we already are.
--
--
Internet News
My BLOG
My Web Page |
|
Reviews:
·Comcast
| said by fAcEtIOUs:said by Cabal:Well, at least I agree with something in these multiple articles. Can someone tell me again why we're expecting companies to roll out services and infrastructure to areas that will never even pay off the cost of that infrastructure in our lifetimes? Those who want this BB policy expect the taxpayers to pay for broadband to every little rural whistle stop and farmhouse, and damn the cost. In other words, become more of a socialist country than we already are. Mine as well be more socialist.
I mean really we have so many problems not addressed at this point whats one more in the pot.
Why can't we take the usf slush fund and actually use it for something other then letting the companies dip in to make their bottom line look better.
--
"It's always funny until someone gets hurt......and then it's absolutely friggin' hysterical!" |
|
jytr
join:2005-02-03
Cliffwood, NJ | reply to fAcEtIOUs
Socialism for the wealthy and capitalism for the rest of us.
Peace
"America. Home of the free and enslaved" (C) 2007 James T. Romano |
|
RadioDoc58ef2c0Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11 | reply to Cabal
Bah. We don't need to do anything. Just ask the NCTA. They say only 6% of the country is not wired for cable broadband right now!
--
Toolmaster of La Grange. |
|
 marigoldsGainfully employed, finallyPremium,MVM
join:2002-05-13
Saint Louis, MO
kudos:1 | reply to fAcEtIOUs
said by fAcEtIOUs:Those who want this BB policy expect the taxpayers to pay for broadband to every little rural whistle stop and farmhouse, and damn the cost. In other words, become more of a socialist country than we already are. Leaving out Alaska, which is like addressing another country all by itself, what is the farthest distance in the continental United States from a metropolitan statistical area (including all MSAs, CMSAs, and PMSAs)?
In other words, how much of a "whistle stop and farmhouse" are we talking about?
--
ISCABBS - the oldest and largest BBS on the Internet
telnet://bbs.iscabbs.com
Professional Geographer
Geographic Information Science researcher |
|
Sammer
join:2005-12-22
Canonsburg, PA
1 edit | reply to BosstonesOwn
Re: "Why can't we take the usf slush fund and ..." said by BosstonesOwn:Why can't we take the usf slush fund and actually use it for something other then letting the companies dip in to make their bottom line look better. Yes, why are we still spending zillions to make universal landline voice service available to anyone who can afford to pay the monthly bill? |
|
1 edit | reply to fAcEtIOUs
Re: "Because we can't even agree there's a problem" said by fAcEtIOUs:said by Cabal:Well, at least I agree with something in these multiple articles. Can someone tell me again why we're expecting companies to roll out services and infrastructure to areas that will never even pay off the cost of that infrastructure in our lifetimes? Those who want this BB policy expect the taxpayers to pay for broadband to every little rural whistle stop and farmhouse, and damn the cost. In other words, become more of a socialist country than we already are. You forgot one import item the broadband socialist want with a national broadband policy: price controls. They want their cake but do not even want to pay wholesale. |
|
| reply to marigolds
What socialist country are u talking about? I know you don't mean the "big govt is better" usa. Or instead of big govt maybe we are run by the corp's, which would make us an oligarchy. But maybe I am wrong and we are socialist country where 3 or 5% of population controls 90+% of wealth. |
|
PDXPLT
join:2003-12-04
Banks, OR | reply to fAcEtIOUs
said by fAcEtIOUs:Those who want this BB policy expect the taxpayers to pay for broadband to every little rural whistle stop and farmhouse, and damn the cost. Who, specifically, says this?
I find it hard to believe anyone would:
-- The chances of implementing such an idea would be very low;
-- It's not at all what other countries with more successful deployments have done;
-- It's not at all what the U.S. did in the past for ubiquitious telephone and electricity deployment.
Methinksts it is far more likely that this characterization is "spin" intended to demonize the policy of ubiquitious BB deployment as much as possible, in order to favor a policy that benefits short-term business interests as much as possible. |
|
Ahrenl
join:2004-10-26
North Andover, MA | reply to marigolds
Quite a bit actually.. there's this big swath of country called the Mid-West.
 |
|
|
|
fiberguyMy views are my own.Premium
join:2005-05-20
kudos:3 | That map, although interesting, doesn't speak much for broadband deployment.
Take two states, called the midwest,...Minnesota and Iowa.. (And some people still call Ohio the "midwest" when they are more eastern than anything) but Minnesota and Iowa... both of those states have broadband in places most people wouldn't think broadband exists. Iowa, for being mostly farm land, actually has some pretty good rural coverage. As for Minneosta, many of the smaller areas have broadband too..
--
"Complaining is the least path of resistance for the self-reitchous and lazy..." |
|
fiberguyMy views are my own.Premium
join:2005-05-20
kudos:3 | reply to RadioDoc
It's all cable's fault.. Good one, telco fanboy.
But, setting the facts straight, cable covers more ground in this nation that telephone's DSL service.
What exactly is telephone doing to deploy HSI services in areas that don't have it?
... I thought so.
--
"Complaining is the least path of resistance for the self-reitchous and lazy..." |
|
Ahrenl
join:2004-10-26
North Andover, MA | reply to fiberguy
Well the question was "what is the farthest distance in the continental United States from a metropolitan statistical area." So I was simply answering that. The map doesn't take into account infrastructure at all. Hell I bet they have GREAT service in Aspen Colorado. |
|
Host:
Road Runner
PC gaming GAMES
PC gaming Tech
| reply to PDXPLT
quote:
Methinksts it is far more likely that this characterization is "spin" intended to demonize the policy of ubiquitious BB deployment as much as possible, in order to favor a policy that benefits short-term business interests as much as possible.
Eloquently put and 100% accurate. |
|
 ThalerPremium
join:2004-02-02
Los Angeles, CA
kudos:3 | reply to fiberguy
YMMV though.
I have relatives in Louisiana that *just* got broadband made avaliable to them. |
|
 pnh102Reptiles Are Cuddly And PrettyPremium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD | said by Thaler:I have relatives in Louisiana that *just* got broadband made avaliable to them. Wow! And this happened without a "national broadband policy" too!
--
Only SHATNER is Kirk. |
|
marigoldsGainfully employed, finallyPremium,MVM
join:2002-05-13
Saint Louis, MO
kudos:1 | reply to Ahrenl
Most of the midwest is near a metro area now... you are thinking of the great plains 
(That map is 10 years old and the metro area coverage increased about 40-60% since then.)
But, it does illustrate nicely that most of the United States is not far from a metro. |
|
Host:
Road Runner
PC gaming GAMES
PC gaming Tech
1 edit | I don't buy this idea that "Metro" = served though. There are portions of Brooklyn that can't get DSL, and many third tier cities that have only the choice of a half-assed cable provider drowning in debt, etc....or a well off cable provider that can sodomize users because their only competitive pressure is a local telco offering late 90's interleaved technology or what have you...
It's a mistake to assume that metro=broadband competitive utopia, because that's just not accurate. And obviously, rural competition is worse.
And as broadband becomes increasingly used for social services via website, I think the issue of broad penetration does require more serious thought than investors and other financially motivated individuals are willing to give from their rather myopic, self-serving positions... |
|
RadioDoc58ef2c0Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11
1 edit | reply to fiberguy
Good one, cable { deleted }. |
|
