Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Why We Have No National Broadband Policy » Ummn.. right.
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
"Because we can't even agree there's a problem" »
« Priorities people  

Fox McCloud
Crazy like a fox.

join:2006-07-23
·Embarq
·Sprint Mobile Broa..

Re: Ummn.. right.

said by Drakemoore See Profile :

Deployment and adoption of high-speed Internet service in the U.S. is a success story that shouldn’t be portrayed as a failure because of misleading statistics -- Cable’s broadband service is available to at least 94 percent of all U.S. homes, McSlarrow pointed out. At the same time that broadband availability has increased, McSlarrow said, the speed of the service also has jumped while prices have declined."

94 Percent, Yeah right >.>

All raise their hand who thinks that's a load of crap

* Raises Hand*
so you're saying that only 18,000,000 don't have access to cable? I find that number exceedingly too long; I'd venture to guess that 70%-80% of the nation has access to cable broadband, but, certainly not 94%
Thaler
Premium
join:2004-02-02
Encino, CA

Re: Ummn.. right.

*shrugs* If I had to do a rough guess, I'd say 50-60% myself. Whenever I have a relative move, usually they have broadband avaliable. However, there is also a good possiblity that they might find themselves in a tech void.

I'd say that 94% is accruate...if we count overpriced satellite ISP systems as true broadband. However, if we're judging on affordable consumer systems (ie. $25-40 per month) then it's around 50-60.

Fox McCloud
Crazy like a fox.

join:2006-07-23
·Embarq
·Sprint Mobile Broa..

Re: Ummn.. right.

said by Thaler See Profile :

*shrugs* If I had to do a rough guess, I'd say 50-60% myself. Whenever I have a relative move, usually they have broadband avaliable. However, there is also a good possiblity that they might find themselves in a tech void.

I'd say that 94% is accruate...if we count overpriced satellite ISP systems as true broadband. However, if we're judging on affordable consumer systems (ie. $25-40 per month) then it's around 50-60.
Yeah, but he stated that CABLE had 94% coverage in the USA; if that were the case, I'd think that I'd probably have cable by now, along with a lot of other people that I know...

But yeah, 94% broadband coverage, period? Yeah, I'd say that's accurate, but that's only because of satellite.
burger2000

join:2001-06-25
Madison, WI

Re: Ummn.. right.

I think whoever from the NCTA that made that comment meant that 94% of U.S. homes that are passed by cable plant have broadband internet service available.

So whoever stated this either misspoke, implied a very important fact, or is just plain misinformed/lying. I lean towards the first.

Fox McCloud
Crazy like a fox.

join:2006-07-23
·Embarq
·Sprint Mobile Broa..

Re: Ummn.. right.

said by burger2000 See Profile :

I think whoever from the NCTA that made that comment meant that 94% of U.S. homes that are passed by cable plant have broadband internet service available.

So whoever stated this either misspoke, implied a very important fact, or is just plain misinformed/lying. I lean towards the first.
ok, that would make a lot more sense.

Seriously though, would there be any reason that if you got cable TV service that you couldn't get cable internet service?
Thaler
Premium
join:2004-02-02
Encino, CA

Re: Ummn.. right.

said by Fox McCloud See Profile :

Seriously though, would there be any reason that if you got cable TV service that you couldn't get cable internet service?
Well, I think there are actually services and stations a cable provider needs to put out in order to provide internet on a cable run. Simply having a copper wire doesn't automatically allow it to act as an ISP...until the cable provider has made the investment.

By similar logic, I could also wonder why everyone doesn't have access to DSL...seeing as how nearly every home is phone-wired anyways.
Forums » Why We Have No National Broadband Policy"Because we can't even agree there's a problem" »
« Priorities people  


Wednesday, 09-Dec 14:21:57 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [197] Sprint Sued For Distracted Driving Death
· [87] AT&T Launching New 24 Mbps U-Verse Tier
· [81] 3G Network Test Says AT&T Is Tops
· [72] Mediacom Unveils 105 Mbps Pricing
· [65] Sprint Poised For A Turnaround?
· [58] WPA Cracker: Test WPA-PSK Networks In 20 Minutes
· [50] The Future Of Wi-Fi Is Bright
· [47] Site Leaks Yahoo, Verizon Fed Data Share Pricing
· [44] Microwaving Your Innards Is Not 'Extreme'
· [39] Verizon LTE: 5-12 Mbps Downstream
Most people now reading
· Comcast refused to install 400' feet. [Comcast HSI]
· Is sleeping similar to being dead? [General Questions]
· Cross Server Dungeon Experience [World of Warcraft]
· HoR, PoS and FoS [World of Warcraft]
· [ Classes] ATTN Death Knights - Post your spec for critique! [World of Warcraft]
· Buzzing whatchamacallit in ceiling...?? Help identify. [Home Repair & Improvement]
· The aftermath [World of Warcraft]
· MicroSoft Discontinues Sale of Windows 7 Family Pack in US [Microsoft Help]
· New PvE Content [World of Warcraft]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]