 calvoiper
join:2003-03-31
Belvedere Tiburon, CA | Maybe it's "pro-consumer" like a logo.... Maybe the RIAA is thinking songs are like Chanel bags--as in the bulk of the value to the consumer is to be able to wave it around and essentially shout, "I've got one and you don't!"
With that approach, the RIAA has missed my reason for acquiring music, but then I don't have white ear-buds, either.
calvoiper
--
VoIP--the death knell of remaining voice monopolies! |
|
| trying to play Devil's Advocate, I can't even think of one reason why DRM is good or beneficial
I mean, it's not like they let you take your old Records/cassettes in to exchange straight up for CD's or DVD's, or whatever new media format comes out |
|
| I think he means Pro Corporate not pro-consumer. |
|
 vpokoPremium
join:2003-07-03
Boston, MA | reply to Tikker_LoS
said by Tikker_LoS:trying to play Devil's Advocate, I can't even think of one reason why DRM is good or beneficial I mean, it's not like they let you take your old Records/cassettes in to exchange straight up for CD's or DVD's, or whatever new media format comes out If pressed they'd weakly argue that DRM helps keep music prices low, because without it there would be rampant piracy which would force them to charge more. Nevermind that it's a vicous cycle, the more they charge the more people will pirate, leading to a lower average price per song as more and more are obtained for free. |
|
 dvd536as Mr. Pink as they comePremium
join:2001-04-27
Phoenix, AZ
kudos:4 | reply to iEvolution
said by iEvolution:I think he means Pro Corporate not pro-consumer. BINGO!
i dont know of any consumer that wants DRM.
--
You can never be too rich, too thin or have too much Bandwidth |
|
| Remember, his customer are the record companies. Not the actual consumer's of music. |
|
