<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Fiber To The Premise is the only way to go. in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r18243519</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:02:46 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:02:46 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Fiber To The Premise is the only way to go.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18248278</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/766258"><b>batterup</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  telcolackey <A HREF="/useremail/u/1451268"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>  Why are most office drops still twisted pair?<br><br> <br> </DIV>Because they are in Death Vally?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18248278</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 13:18:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Fiber To The Premise is the only way to go.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18247559</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1250575"><b>MadMANN</b></A> : *SIGH*<br><br>Are you really going to make me pull the other dozens of bad review links?  I really don't feel like it, which is why I just pulled the first one I saw yesterday.<br><br>The point was that not EVERYONE is "delighted" as the above apparent ad exec from Verizon would have you believe.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18247559</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 10:07:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Fiber To The Premise is the only way to go.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18247383</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><b>JeepMatt</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  MadMANN <A HREF="/useremail/u/1250575"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>Not all are delighted<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="/comment/2568/60620">Review of Verizon FIOS by Gspro2000</A><br> </DIV>So 1 customer has an isolated issue at his CO? Lol..c'mon now MadMANN.  :p<br><SMALL>--<br>"ONE team - ONE city - ONE dream!!"</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18247383</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 09:01:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Fiber To The Premise is the only way to go.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18244011</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1451268"><b>telcolackey</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  FIOS <A HREF="/useremail/u/1445055"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>The only way to delight the subscriber is to bring fiber into his building.<br> </DIV>Sounds like messaging straight from Verizon marketing<br><br>FTTP stands for Fiber To The Press release.  This is mostly hype and the smart techies know it.  If fiber to the home is needed today, why aren't homes wired with fiber?  Why are most office drops still twisted pair?<br><br>Copper and COAX have a long way and many technology advancements to go before home capacity <B>requires</B> a new media.  Then, and only when it is needed, the fiber becomes deeper in HFC.  Anything other than that is wasted capital for anyone other than telco's with 50 year old infrastructure.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18244011</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 15:36:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Fiber To The Premise is the only way to go.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18243989</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1250575"><b>MadMANN</b></A> : Not all are delighted<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="/comment/2568/60620">Review of Verizon FIOS by Gspro2000</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18243989</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 15:32:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Fiber To The Premise is the only way to go.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18243561</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1310911"><b>HyPeRbAnD</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  FIOS <A HREF="/useremail/u/1445055"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</SMALL><BR><BR>The only way to delight the subscriber is to bring fiber into his building.<br> </DIV>I agree, but cable co's are not at that point yet. Coax still has many years ahead of it. There are so many things cable co's can do to free up bandwidth before running FTTH. I think you will see FTTC (Node to passive coax network) before you see FTTH.. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18243561</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:13:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Fiber To The Premise is the only way to go.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18243519</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1445055"><b>FIOS</b></A> : The only way to delight the subscriber is to bring fiber into his building.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18243519</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:05:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
