 pokesphIt Is Almost FastPremium
join:2001-06-25
Sacramento, CA
kudos:1 | 7.5% sounds good to me..
7.5% of nothing is ummm.. lemme check my handy calculator.. umm nothing!
so if you make $0 from your webcasting you pay $0 in fees.. right? |
|
| In a word... yes. |
|
RadioDoc58ef2c0Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11 | reply to pokesph
The pending bill includes a minimum annual fee of $500. The RIAA-backed CRB decision had that at $500 per month.
--
Toolmaster of La Grange. |
|
| reply to SRFireside
Paying nothing sounds great.
But why stop with music?
Maybe we should have the Congress pass a law capping the prices of EVERYTHING at zero.
Who wouldn't want that? |
|
| The trick here is how copyright law works. The whole point of it is to help promote artists by protecting them from exploitation. If you make money off of an artist's work you should pay that artist a piece of your profits. You make nothing from the artist's work then I suppose the artist can't complain, but I'm sure you have to make absolutely nothing in order to satisfy copyright law. That means you made absolutely no revenue. Not that you broke even with expenses and income. |
|
