<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Bill Would Overturn Increase In Internet Radio Royalities in Technology Law &#x26; Politics</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r18244171</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:12:05 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:12:05 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Bill Would Overturn Increase In Internet Radio Royalities</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18244171</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1274664"><b>robertfl</b></A> : Bill Would Overturn Increase In Internet Radio Royalities<br><br>The bill would overturn a decision that would require Internet <br>broadcasters to pay three times as much as their over-the-airwaves <br>counterparts for the right to play music.<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=199202191" >www.informationweek.com/story/sh&middot;&middot;&middot;99202191</A><br><br>By K.C. Jones<br>InformationWeek<br>April 27, 2007 12:21 PM<br><br>Internet radio broadcasters could get a break from a bill introduced <br>this week that would lower the rates they pay for playing music.<br><br>U.S. Reps. Don Manzullo, an Illinois Republican, and Jay Inslee, a <br>Washington Democrat, introduced a bill to overturn a Copyright Royalty <br>Board (CRB) decision that would require Internet broadcasters to pay <br>three times as much as their over-the-airwaves counterparts for the <br>right to play music.<br><br>The Internet Radio Equality Act, introduced Thursday, could ultimately <br>impact up to 70 million Americans who, according to Nielson Media <br>Research, listen to online music stations each month. The bill would <br>mandate royalty parity for Internet, satellite, and cable radio, as well <br>as jukeboxes and traditional radio.<br><br>The CRB increased royalty rates(PDF) for Webcast music, setting a <br>retroactive rate of $0.0008 per song for 2006. The rate in 2005 was <br>$.0007 per song. Under the ruling, announced March 2, the amount is set <br>to rise to $0.0019 per song by 2010. That -- plus a $500 per station fee <br>and the elimination of fee schedules that based fees on a percentage of <br>revenue -- could amount to a 300% for large operations and up to 1,200% <br>for smaller operations, according to digital media representatives.<br><br>"In last few days, we have received hundreds of e-mails from <br>constituents of ours, who are online music listeners," said Rich Carter, <br>a spokesman for Rep. Manzullo, in an interview. "I think we're going to <br>see a massive grassroots interest in this. Hopefully things can come <br>together quickly on this and we can get it changed."<br><br>The CRB's rules are scheduled to take effect May 15, and Internet <br>broadcasters will be hit not only with an increase in current rates but <br>a bill for the retroactive fees.<br><br>Jack Ward, of SaveNetRadio, the group lobbying against the Recording <br>Industry Association of America and the CRB ruling, said in an interview <br>Friday that the increases are "astronomical." He said the bill for the <br>difference in the old rates and the retroactive hike is one "no small <br>Webcaster can pay."<br><br>The RIAA referred questions about the bill to SoundExchange, which <br>represents record labels and artists. That orginization said the <br>proposed legislation would "gut the fair market rates.<br><br>"If passed, the bill would also result in a windfall of more than $50 <br>million to mega-corporate webcasters like Clear Channel and Microsoft at <br>the expense of recording artists across the country," the group said in <br>a prepared statement. "Because the bill is retroactive, artists would <br>have to write checks to cover refunds to corporations whose CEOs and top <br>executives are paid millions of dollars per year."<br><br>John Simson, executive director of SoundExchange, said: "The idea that <br>this bill would help small Webcasters or artists is ludicrous since less <br>than 2% of all royalty payments in 2006 came from small Webcasters. The <br>true beneficiaries are the mega-multiplex services like AOL, Yahoo, <br>Microsoft, and Clear Channel, which will benefit from rates <br>substantially lower than those set by the Librarian of Congress in 2002."<br><br>Reps. Manzullo and Inslee echoed the concerns of Internet music <br>providers and supporters who have said the increases will bankrupt some <br>companies and force others to stop streaming on-air programs over the <br>Internet.<br><br>"This Titanic rate increase is simply untenable for many Internet radio <br>broadcasters," Inslee, a member of the House Energy and Commerce <br>Subcommittee on Telecommunications and the Internet, said in a prepared <br>statement. "You can't put an economic chokehold on this emerging force <br>of democracy. There has to be a business model that allows creative <br>Webcasters to thrive and the existing rule removes all the oxygen from <br>this space."]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18244171</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 16:09:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
